<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: BlueJay54 on Blaise Pascal ??? Please
Review: Bluejay54 You Had Me interested at the beginning with your comments. You sounded reasonably intelligent until I came to your comment: Mind you, one should not expect to learn this from a Christian writer and a Christian publishing house, but Pascal's natal astrology chart clearly illustrates the problems and paradoxes that he faced in life: Venus in Cancer squaring the Moon's Nodes and opposing Mars in Capricorn, with healing Chiron in Taurus, and a Stellium (Jupiter conjunct Saturn conjunct Uranus) in Leo. No wonder Pascal felt so torn by fame-and-fortune seeking of his keen mind, yet was irresistibly drawn to a fiery fundamentalism and an ascetic life-style! Christianity, Pascal--NO God Himself--can't be Viewed, Explained, argued Logically, or Intelligently from "ASTROLOGICAL" Premises. I did however find your comments, amusing, and commical.
Rating: 
Summary: Excellent for Context and Analysis
Review: I found this biography of Pascal enjoyable and very good for context and analysis. It is difficult to understand Pascal without a good grasp of the religious controversies at this time troubling Paris and the spiritual persons to whom Pascal felt close. For that reason, you may feel a little bogged down at first by explanations of theological and historical matters seemingly unrelated to the man. Bear with the author, because you will need to know these things in order to fully appreciate the passion and bravery (not to mention the substance) of Pascal's latter writings. There is excellent analysis here of Pascal's "Night of Fire" -- the 2nd, dramatic conversion to an intense fervor of Christianity -- as well as of his apologetic _Pensees_. The discussion of the _Pensees_ is just a taste, and after reading this book you will want to obtain a copy. There is so much more to Pascal than this book has room to tell, but it is a good general introduction, serious and somewhat scholarly, but reliable and not recklessly speculative. The picture that emerges is of a first-rate intellect deeply and emotionally touched, changed by an encounter with God.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent for Context and Analysis
Review: I found this biography of Pascal enjoyable and very good for context and analysis. It is difficult to understand Pascal without a good grasp of the religious controversies at this time troubling Paris and the spiritual persons to whom Pascal felt close. For that reason, you may feel a little bogged down at first by explanations of theological and historical matters seemingly unrelated to the man. Bear with the author, because you will need to know these things in order to fully appreciate the passion and bravery (not to mention the substance) of Pascal's latter writings. There is excellent analysis here of Pascal's "Night of Fire" -- the 2nd, dramatic conversion to an intense fervor of Christianity -- as well as of his apologetic _Pensees_. The discussion of the _Pensees_ is just a taste, and after reading this book you will want to obtain a copy. There is so much more to Pascal than this book has room to tell, but it is a good general introduction, serious and somewhat scholarly, but reliable and not recklessly speculative. The picture that emerges is of a first-rate intellect deeply and emotionally touched, changed by an encounter with God.
Rating: 
Summary: Pascal combined intelligence with an acute need for God
Review: In this new volume in the LIBRARY OF RELIGIOUS BIOGRAPHY series, Marvin R. O'Connell illumines Pascal's life and times with a chronological narrative based on the published sources. Meticulously researched yet written in an enjoyable style accessible to all, this biography will aptly acquaint readers with this remarkable human being and luminous Christian thinker.
Rating: 
Summary: What reasons?
Review: Make no mistake: this is *not* a book about Pascal the man, nor even a book about Pascal the (ascetic) Christian, but an excruciatingly painful book about the minutiae of Pasal's historical milieu and a long-winded discussion of the Jesuit/Jansenist dispute. I found the writing awkward in the extreme, with topical areas abstruse and singularly irrelevant to learning anything particularly useful about Pascal's life. (Well, given Pascal's later penchant for asceticism and renunciation of all pleasures--like enjoying steak dinners, the company of friends, or exercising his intellectual curiosity by inventing probability theory--at least that style was rhetorically appropriate!) Most of what *was" useful here can easily be found elsewhere. For example, when the converted Pascal visited his secular friends, he used to wear a belt studded with pins or nails on the inside so they poked him painfully in the waist, lest he enjoy their company too much. This fact I discovered in Guinness' introductory essay to Houston's "Mind on Fire" and *not* in the present book. In fact, I learned more about Pascal there and from on-line biographies that from this piece of work. Mind you, one should not expect to learn this from a Christian writer and a Christian publishing house, but Pascal's natal astrology chart clearly illustrates the problems and paradoxes that he faced in life: Venus in Cancer squaring the Moon's Nodes and opposing Mars in Capricorn, with healing Chiron in Taurus, and a Stellium (Jupiter conjunct Saturn conjunct Uranus) in Leo. No wonder Pascal felt so torn by fame-and-fortune seeking of his keen mind, yet was irresistibly drawn to a fiery fundamentalism and an ascetic life-style! But all Mr. O'Connell can do is muster up a bit of pity for poor Blaise's "restless heart [that] never quite purged itself of a lust for fame and worldly success [6]." Overall, the book did virtually nothing to illuminate the quote that inspired the title: "The heart has its reasons, of which Reason knows nothing," which was my reason for reading the book. Nor does it adequately explain other paradoxes: How could a genius like Pascal, fundamentalist or not, turn in a friend to the religious police for being a heretic? Why he was so bonded to his sister and why, with Cancer so prominent in his chart, did he never marry? Why his extremist embrace of original sin and human depravity? The book may have value or even be a big hit among believing Christians. But for a pagan neo-Vedantist yogi like me, this book shed absolutely no light at all on how a genius like Pascal wrestled with Ego to reconcile himself to Abstinence or (to paraphrase Kant) how he denied Reason in order to affirm Spirit. I'll have to find those reasons elsewhere....
<< 1 >>
| 
