Home :: Books :: Reference  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference

Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
The Captive Press: Foreign Policy Crisis and the First Amendment

The Captive Press: Foreign Policy Crisis and the First Amendment

List Price: $14.95
Your Price: $14.95
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Excellent
Review: A good book, meticulously researched and lucidly written, on the erosion of press freedoms in America. It reviews briefly the freedom of the press (or lack thereof) in wartime from the early years of the Republic through the two world wars, then covers the Korean War and other foreign conflicts, including (especially) Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, the Persian Gulf War, Yugoslavia, Somalia, Haiti and others. Analyzed is the government's ever-expanding, Cold War-rationalized power to censor media coverage of foreign interventions to the extent that the government may today censor as it wills and prosecute unauthorized leakages of classified information with a power, affirmed by judicial precedent, almost functionally equivalent to that authorized the government of Great Britain by the infamous Official Secrets Act. It is shown that the government frequently invokes national security to censor journalists for political or other non-military reasons. The nuances of the media-government relationship are explored. Tremendously valuable points are journalists' complicity in their own censorship and their readiness to swallow government propaganda without question. Many of today's journalists, this book shows, view themselves as mere tools in American foreign policy and have forgotten their original role in the defense of freedom from government encroachment.

My only major criticism of the book is that it ascribes, in part, government officials' and journalists' disregard of the 1st Amendment to institutional influences in a way that seems to absolve them of guilt, as if, Marxian-style, their jobs determine their ideology. This position is dangerous. It excuses the guilty parties and ignores other possible causal factors. I, for one, can say with absolute certainty that because of my philosophical beliefs I would never--ever--censor journalists for any other reason than to save the lives of the men under my command (if I were in such a position).


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates