<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Informative good read
Review: If someone is interested in learning the origins, history, and development of the English language, then he or she will gain a lot from this book. There are many technical aspects included. It's also enjoyable. Many applied linguistic terms and areas are covered. From English's relationship to Sanskrit and other languages, to the great vowel shift explaining why English often doesn't sound the way it's spelled--difficult and illogical for students learning the language. The author went into depth about such topics as the culture of the Germanic tribes and how demographics influenced the development of the English language the way it did. The Scandinavians, French, and many others have loaded the language with with many loans words. It's a good informative read.
Rating:
Summary: Informative good read
Review: If someone is interested in learning the origins, history, and development of the English language, then he or she will gain a lot from this book. There are many technical aspects included. It's also enjoyable. Many applied linguistic terms and areas are covered. From English's relationship to Sanskrit and other languages, to the great vowel shift explaining why English often doesn't sound the way it's spelled--difficult and illogical for students learning the language. The author went into depth about such topics as the culture of the Germanic tribes and how demographics influenced the development of the English language the way it did. The Scandinavians, French, and many others have loaded the language with with many loans words. It's a good informative read.
Rating: 
Summary: the connection between English and Dutch
Review: Just some remarks from a very specific angle.Being Dutch but living in the U.S., I usually tell my American friends that for Anglophones Dutch is the most related language (actually Frisian is even more related but that mini-language is Holland's second language, and I don't want to make things too complicated). The funny thing is that even well-educated Americans normally are not aware of this fact. Some even told me that Celtic, being the second language of the U.K., was probably more related (this book makes clear, by the way, that Celtic is related to the Germanic languages but only remotedly, as another member of the Indo-European family), or French (because of the many loan words). Well, this book confirms what I tell my Anglophone friends. The funny thing is that I am quite convinced that the Old and even Middle English texts, which Barber quotes, are probably more comprehensible to Dutch readers than to Anglophones. Dutch remained a fully West-Germanic language but English, though at its core still very much a West-Germanic language, was heavily influenced by North Germanic (Scandinavian) and especially French, due to the invasions of Vikings and Normands. It's curious how the Old English texts use words that still are current in Dutch but (more or less) lost in modern English: "onfeng" is "ontvangen" in Dutch but became "receive" (i.e. a French loan word) in English. "Niman" is "nemen" in Dutch but "take" (Scandinavian) in modern English. "Witan" is "weten" in Dutch but became "to know" in modern English. I found endless other examples in this book ("Ic dorste" = Ik dorst (in Dutch) = I dared (in English). In fact, I guess that an old question I had can now be answered. I was always curious to know what the Anglosaxon missionaries Willibrord and Bonifatius in the 7th and 8th century spoke when they brought the Gospel to the Lowlands. Well, it seems pretty sure that they just used there own language that was still intelligible to the Low Landers (something like Dutch and Afrikaander these days: it takes a little bit of effort only to understand it). Some of the Old English texts read like a modern Dutch dialect. I have, though, the feeling that Barber does not know much Dutch (nor Frisian). We hear something about Dutch loan words that ended up in English in later centuries. I wonder, however, whether some of the modern English words, that according to Barber have Scandinavian roots, are not just West-Germanic. Why is "give" Scandinavian, if the Dutch cognate is "geven". Same for "loose" ("los" in Dutch), "smile" ("smuilen" in Dutch, with a slightly different meaning), "call" ("kallen" is common in many Dutch dialects, meaning "to talk"), "though" (is "doch" in Dutch), "hoast" (in some English dialects = "cough", = "hoesten" in Dutch: maybe the root is not Scandinavian but just West-Germanic). By the way, it is not mentioned in this book but the sound shift from "kerk" (Dutch) to "church" does English have in common with Frisian. Anyway, I like books of this kind. I can assure my Anglophone friends now with even more conviction that Dutch is for them the most related language though I am afraid that that fact helps Dutch more when they read Old English than Anglophones when they want to learn modern Dutch. The days of Willibrord and Bonifatius are beyond any doubt far behind us...
Rating:
Summary: great introduction to history of english language
Review: My interest in linguistics began when my latin teacher began talk about past forms of english in class. I was looking through the book store to find more about what he was talking about. Many of the titles looked either too thick or too long. then i came across this title. It was thin and supposedly for beginners like me. I thought i would give it a try and purchased it. When i got home i immediatly began to read. It was getting dark by the time i put it down. I am an avid fan of fiction, and only read non fiction for the information. I usually find it boring, yet informative and long to be finished with it. But this book i found was very interesting as well as informative and i could not put it down. It introduces you first to the various symbols used to show different sound and then wastes no time plunging you right into the beginnings of the language through old, middle, and early modern english. It was easy to follow as long as you had the symbols memorized and gave a brief history of the times when the languge was at certain stages. I finished it quickly and understood most of the stuff i read. Now i feel i can step up to the next level and read some of the more complex books. This book was a good foundation for my interest in linguistics and i found no fault in it.
Rating:
Summary: great introduction to history of english language
Review: My interest in linguistics began when my latin teacher began talk about past forms of english in class. I was looking through the book store to find more about what he was talking about. Many of the titles looked either too thick or too long. then i came across this title. It was thin and supposedly for beginners like me. I thought i would give it a try and purchased it. When i got home i immediatly began to read. It was getting dark by the time i put it down. I am an avid fan of fiction, and only read non fiction for the information. I usually find it boring, yet informative and long to be finished with it. But this book i found was very interesting as well as informative and i could not put it down. It introduces you first to the various symbols used to show different sound and then wastes no time plunging you right into the beginnings of the language through old, middle, and early modern english. It was easy to follow as long as you had the symbols memorized and gave a brief history of the times when the languge was at certain stages. I finished it quickly and understood most of the stuff i read. Now i feel i can step up to the next level and read some of the more complex books. This book was a good foundation for my interest in linguistics and i found no fault in it.
Rating:
Summary: An excellent, if heavily technical, layman's guide
Review: This book is an excellent introduction to the history of the English language. As the other reviewers have noted, it's a bit top-heavy on technical linguistics, and therefore may not be suitable to everyone. But if you don't mind reading a book which could also be used as a 400-level college textbook... I think this book would appeal to any who have an interest in linguistics in general and the history on English in particular - especially if you've read other, lighter books on the topic already and you're ready to get seriously into the topic. I fit the above category, and I loved this book. Probably the best I've read on the subject so far.
Rating:
Summary: An excellent, if heavily technical, layman's guide
Review: This book is an excellent introduction to the history of the English language. As the other reviewers have noted, it's a bit top-heavy on technical linguistics, and therefore may not be suitable to everyone. But if you don't mind reading a book which could also be used as a 400-level college textbook... I think this book would appeal to any who have an interest in linguistics in general and the history on English in particular - especially if you've read other, lighter books on the topic already and you're ready to get seriously into the topic. I fit the above category, and I loved this book. Probably the best I've read on the subject so far.
<< 1 >>
|
