Rating: 
Summary: delightful
Review: ahh... finally a dictonary that clears up easily (and far too often) confused words and showcases delightfully pretentious selections, too!
Rating: 
Summary: Fills Its Purpose Beautifully
Review: I believe that there are two kinds of people in this world. The first type are people that use language merely as a means to communicate. The second type are people that use language as an artform. If you are the first type of person; do not buy this book. It will have no use or meaning for you, and you certainly won't find it entertaining. Unless you just have a quirky need to read dictionaries, you won't dig this volume, AT ALL. If you are the second type of person - the type that enjoys learning new words just for the sake of knowing them; the type that likes being able to say the same thing 15 different ways...then this book is for you. I love to write. I love to read. I enjoy using words for fun and for creative expression. This book gave me words that I had never heard before and that is, indeed, becoming a rare treasure to find. I'm a huge word geek, and so this dictionary was a perfect fit for me. I thoroughly enjoyed the book, and I actually read it from cover to cover like a novel (except that I went through with a highlighter as I read). Words can be used to fill a lot of different purposes, and they can be enjoyed in a much broader way than just coming to understand the definitions. Conveying information is only ONE of language's many functions. Though the words in this book are not likely to find a place in your daily conversational vocabulary set, they will most assuredly become a part of your poems, your stories, and that file-cabinet of knowledge we all keep way back in the recesses of our brains. I highly recommend this book to all of my fellow wordsmiths and nerd/geek/dorks the world over.
Rating: 
Summary: Simple Minds find Simple Definitions
Review: Oh will the ceaseless flow of proscriptive grammars by snobbish, elderly fools never cease? Why must I always be buried in an avalanche of these things? They only serve to arm the ignorant with brutish, foolish assumptions about language, where it came from, and where it's going. Language, despite what this and many authors would like you to believe, is constantly changing. It is a tool used between two people for the purpose of communication. If it accomplishes that task to the satisfaction of both participants, only a fool would complain (and they often do). Trying to find the "right" definition for a word is like trying to find the "right" second on the clock. It marches on, whether you like it or not. The king of England in 1000 AD "aksed" questions. Do YOU "aks" questions? Neither do I (It's something called Metathesis. It attacked that word 800 years ago). But Lederer and Ehrlich still should, since they spend so much time railing against the very natural changes languages take. Worse yet, Old English was itself a permutation of Proto-Germanic, which was the product of Proto-Indo-European. Where that came from, we don't know. So in short, I expect them both to be speaking perfect Proto-Indo-Eurpoean by the end of the afternoon or admit themselves to be the foolish, hypocritical frauds that they are. "Highly Selective". The only high thing about that group is the horse they rode in on.
Rating:
Summary: A Unique and Useful Compilation for College Students
Review: Sometimes it is wise not to judge a book by its title. I suggest that you ignore the elitist title and concentrate on its contents. The Highly Selective Dictionary for the Extraordinary Literate is a useful compilation, a helpful tool for college students. Eugene Ehrlich offers only those words that you are likely to reference in a dictionary. Simple words are not listed. For example, none of the words that I used in this review can be found in his selective dictionary. Likewise, those 500,000 words in the English language that are rarely used are not included in this book. Ehrlich's words inhabit a borderland separating those words we already know and those words that we will never need to know. Did he get it right? Well, it depends on the geographic position of your particular borderland. I offer you some empirical data. I am reading for the first time The Way of the World, an early eighteenth century play by William Congreve. I found only two troublesome words (billingsgate and nonpariel) in the editor's 12-page introduction. Ehrlich provided clear, concise definitions for both words. Previously I reviewed a rather scholarly work, The Odes of John Keats, by Helen Vendler, a respected literature professor at Harvard. I scanned a random chapter (Ode to a Nightingale, 32 pages) and found synecdoche, antiphonal, discarnate, mimetic, solipsistic, and efficacious. Only the words antiphonal and discarnate were not in Ehrlich's dictionary. I looked at random pages in Ehrlich's dictionary, tested myself, and concluded that for about one-fourth of the entries I would have trouble offering an acceptable definition, even with some help from contextual clues. I listed below three typical pages from Ehrlich's dictionary: We find on page 67 the words existentialism, exoteric (do not confuse with esoteric), expatiate, expiate, explicate, and expostulate, and on page 111 is mimesis (and mimetic), minatory, misanthrope, miscegenation, miscreant, misogamy, misogyny, misprision, and mitigate (sometimes confused with militate), and lastly on page 164 there is sophistry, soporific, sororicide, soubrette, soupcon, specious, splenetic, spoonerism, and squash (as contrasted with quash). I originally bought this dictionary to help my daughter prepare for the GRE. Having devoted some time to browsing this fascinating compilation, I now hope that she will not forget to return Ehrlich's dictionary to me.
Rating: 
Summary: A Book Without A Purpose
Review: This "dictionary" is so "highly selective" that it is not all that useful as a reference. If you encounter a word you want to look up, your chance of finding it in this dictionary is near zero. It should be more appropriately named as a collection of certain less frequently used words. If you read this book from cover to cover, you will probably find that you know many of the words already and, of the ones you don't know, you may retain a few of them. Well, I am probably not "extraordinarily literate."
Rating: 
Summary: Fun, but not useful
Review: This book is for word buffs. It does not make a great reference book, since it just lists lots of words that you could find in a real dictionary. And it doesn't work well as a thesaurus, either. (See the author's other works.) However, if you are looking for a word that has a certain sound, or if you are curious about the difference between two similar words (like apprise and appraise), this is handy book. Also, if you want to create an insult for someone, it's a neat resource to have available. For instance, these insults are listed in the introduction: "grandiloquent popinjay, venal pettifogger, nefarious miscreant, flagitious recidivist, sententious blatherskite, mawkish ditherer, arrant peculator, irascible misanthrope, hubiristic narcissist, feckless sycophant, vituperative virago, vapid yahoo," and so on. It gets to be fun. Too bad it could not be more usefully organized.
Rating:
Summary: A very interesting book.
Review: This book is quite interesting. It's a most interesting dictionary, filled with words that you couldn't find in most dictionaries. I don't agree with many of their selections that are for the 'highly literate' (if you don't know 'regretful and regimen' you might want to start with the regular dictionary) but many of the words are good (defenestartion, quidnunc, etc.). This is the best way to insult people that I have ever found. I'm not sure I would buy this for myself, but it makes a good gift. I sure enjoyed getting it as a gift, but I'm sure you would enjoy it just buying it for yourself. Enjoy!
Rating:
Summary: Refine Your Vocabulary
Review: This dictionary is not as elitist or highbrow as the title implies. Although it does contain the occasional arcane or rare word (when was the last time you deracinated a gudgeon?), the vast majority of the words are actually in use. Its two great strengths are that, unlike similar collections, it gives a pronunciation guide and it very usefully instructs the reader in distinguishing between words that are commonly confused, e.g., founder and flounder. Therefore, whether you like to peruse the lexicon to be instructed, amused or amazed or want to improve your reading and writing skills for school or work, this book is a welcome addition to your collection.
Rating:
Summary: Not your typical dictionary
Review: This is a great book but not quite what I expected. It is more like a book you would use to study vocabulary for the SATs than a traditional dictionary. There aren't that many words listed and I don't think you would have much luck looking up words -- you are not likely to find your word unless it is one of the few included. But the book offers some fascinating words and is better suited to learning new vocabulary, probably best done by reading it cover to cover. If you're not the type to read a dictionary, you won't care for this book.
Rating:
Summary: Interesting little book
Review: This is an interesting little book, but not an entirely useful one - unless, that is, you're the type of person who would sit in an armchair on Sunday afternoons reading the dictionary. If you are, this is the perfect book for you. If you're not, then this little book merely contains some words that your abridged Webster's doesn't, but that the Oxford English Dictionary (which is available by subscription online) does.
Some of the words included in the dictionary surprised me, as I thought they were rather commonplace: rationale; Adonis; forthwith; talisman, and many others.
Still, I do enjoy thumbing through the pages from time to time, discovering obscure words with greater ease than I would if I were perusing the twenty-volume Oxford English Dictionary that sits atop the hutch on my desk.
One other thing the book does is take common words that are misused, such as tortuous, and "set us straight" as to its real definition.
I think that this book would have been more useful - as opposed to simply being an interesting little reference book - if it had been divided perhaps into two sections: Words That Are Misused", and "Words For People Who Want To Appear Extraordinarily Literate". Yes, there was a touch of derision in the latter title; it's very difficult to imagine working most of these words into conversation, much less a term paper, essay, short story, novel, or a longer work of non-fiction. Why? Because if you use a word that people don't understand, you lose your reader. And as a writer, that's the very last thing you want to do.
As long as you don't try to use most of these words, it's a terrific little book.
| 
