<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: Truly witty, truly wise, a distinctive, insightful voice. Review: Beloved of all long-time Washington Post readers, Henry Mitchell covered everything from his hound to the Mapplethorpe exhibit with wisdom, humor, and profound insight. This is a selection of some of the best of his Any Day columns. Never preaching, but always with a point, Mitchell's writing is so personal that thousands who never met him felt his death as the loss of a wise and compassionate friend. You will laugh, cry, and rejoice that you have met him here. The Christmas Eve battle between the Altar Guild and the Ushers is by itself worth the price of the book. This, and the two collections of his Earthman (gardening) columns, are books to read and re-read.
Rating: Summary: Great quirky essays Review: I love this book. Mitchell is unfortunately dead, but when alive he could write like an angel. A random example: "No man is a hero while brushing his teeth or clipping hair out of his ears. He needs some kind of warning that this is the moment to act." He shares himself (a locution he might mock)as he observes the passing world. If you enjoy E.B. White or Russell Baker, buy this book.
Rating: Summary: Great quirky essays Review: I love this book. Mitchell is unfortunately dead, but when alive he could write like an angel. A random example: "No man is a hero while brushing his teeth or clipping hair out of his ears. He needs some kind of warning that this is the moment to act." He shares himself (a locution he might mock)as he observes the passing world. If you enjoy E.B. White or Russell Baker, buy this book.
Rating: Summary: Class without pretension Review: It is unfortunate indeed that such a fine volume boasts just two prior reviews. One needs only to read an essay or two of those collected here to see that Mr. Mitchell was a well-educated, fully informed individual. But his ability to write in a voice that transcended his obviously cultured status, to make his points accessible to people of all backgrounds in a thoughtful, mannerly, and humorous -- always humorous -- style, is an ability his modern-day contemporaries would be smart to emulate. (Are you listening, Maureen Dowd?? Oh, forgive me -- why would we expect you to start now?) Still, Mitchell's discretion could give way to much stronger sounding of his opinion, and flat-out satire that was without peer. Even when it did, Mitchell managed to maintain the tone of rationality and etiquette which was the underpinning of all his work, and which is sadly lacking on today's op-ed pages. This indefinable quality -- and the sheer quality of the writing itself -- sets Mitchell's work apart.
<< 1 >>
|