Home :: Books :: Reference  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference

Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Books of the Century : A Hundred Years of Authors, Ideas, and Literature

Books of the Century : A Hundred Years of Authors, Ideas, and Literature

List Price: $20.00
Your Price:
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: More than Just Book Reviews...But Why?
Review: As the turn of the century neared, I was looking for some great perspectives on literature in the 20th Century. I'm still looking. Outside of the Modern Library' list of the 100 best English Language books of the 20th Century, I haven't seen much. That's too bad because, for me, the literature of the last century is the best compared to all other centuries. One book that has been a good perspective on 20th Century Literature is "Books of the Century" compiled by the editors of the New York "Times" Book Review. They got a bit of a head start on the turn of the century because they were celebrating their 100 years of reviewing books; 100 years that began in 1896. What the editors put together is a chronological selection of their reviews over the years. Of course, most of the selections are from either titles or authors that are well known to most of us. It is interesting to read contemporary reviews of books many decades old. What bothered me as I read through this books is the repeated appearances of letters, essays, and interviews that seemed to me to take up space best reserved for more book reviews. I admit that I enjoyed some of the letters (especially William Manchester's on H.L. Mecken), interviews (especially with I.B. Singer in 1978), and essays (especially Marquez on Hemingway). However, the title of the book suggested a more focussed work. I found myself skimming more and more as I went on. The final 143 pages is a yearly synopsis of the editors' choice of the best books from 1972-1997.

I am glad That the editors put this book out and I am glad that I read it. However, I would have preferred a summation of the editor's choice of the best books from 1896-1997 rather than the synopsis that they gave of the last 26 years.

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: More than Just Book Reviews...But Why?
Review: As the turn of the century neared, I was looking for some great perspectives on literature in the 20th Century. I'm still looking. Outside of the Modern Library' list of the 100 best English Language books of the 20th Century, I haven't seen much. That's too bad because, for me, the literature of the last century is the best compared to all other centuries. One book that has been a good perspective on 20th Century Literature is "Books of the Century" compiled by the editors of the New York "Times" Book Review. They got a bit of a head start on the turn of the century because they were celebrating their 100 years of reviewing books; 100 years that began in 1896. What the editors put together is a chronological selection of their reviews over the years. Of course, most of the selections are from either titles or authors that are well known to most of us. It is interesting to read contemporary reviews of books many decades old. What bothered me as I read through this books is the repeated appearances of letters, essays, and interviews that seemed to me to take up space best reserved for more book reviews. I admit that I enjoyed some of the letters (especially William Manchester's on H.L. Mecken), interviews (especially with I.B. Singer in 1978), and essays (especially Marquez on Hemingway). However, the title of the book suggested a more focussed work. I found myself skimming more and more as I went on. The final 143 pages is a yearly synopsis of the editors' choice of the best books from 1972-1997.

I am glad That the editors put this book out and I am glad that I read it. However, I would have preferred a summation of the editor's choice of the best books from 1896-1997 rather than the synopsis that they gave of the last 26 years.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: A treasure trove for book lovers
Review: Do you ever wonder how some of the most highly regarded and influential books of the century were reviewed when they were first released, without the benefit of hindsight? This book, a collection from the New York Times Book Review, gives you the answer. It's a tribute to the reviewers that they were often right on the money in their evaluations (like the reviews on "Ulysses", "The Grapes of Wrath", "For Whom the Bell Tolls", etc.). It's also kind of a hoot to read the "Oops!" reviews, where they dowgraded books like "Catch-22" and "Catcher in the Rye" when they first came out. There is a lot of fascinating reading here. I just wish it were more comprehensive, which may not be realistic on my part, since that would mean about a 10,000 page book. But for what this book sets out to do, it succeeds with flying colors.

I would suggest that all who are interested in obtaining this book put it in your "Shopping Cart" IMMEDIATELY, because if you come back later and put "Books of the Century" in the search engine, it will inexplicably bring up a bunch of books about architecture. HUHHH?? C'mon, Amazon, let's tweak that search engine a little here!!

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Much interesting stuff but disappointing
Review: I find I have a special curiosity of seeing the way a book which is regarded as a classic today was initially reviewed. This anthology gives the reader many many opportunities to have that pleasure. Perhaps there is a certain joy in seeing the very great imperfection of reviewers. Perhaps there too is pleasure in knowing the true books can survive the worst reviews.
There is also I might add a great pleasure in seeing a masterpiece recognized and declared for what it is immediately.
Nonetheless despite these pleasures and the additional pleasure of being able to read and learn about all kinds of books manyof which I have not read there was for me disappointment in reading this book. I felt too many reviews were simply not substantial enough. I found too little reading that was truly inspiring .
I read through the book, tried to learn what I could from it but it contains nothing, so far as I can tell, that I really feel I long for or need.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: If you like books and book reviews, you'll love this!
Review: If you like books (which I presume you do if you're hanging out on the Amazon.com website :)), and especially if you like book reviews (ditto!), you're going to LOVE this book. Gleaned from a century of New York Times book reviews (plus interviews and letters to the editor), "Books of the Century" gives us the some of the best in 20th century literature, as seen through the eyes of some great reviewers (e.g., WH Auden on Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings"). I can't decide which is more entertaining and edifying -- reading a well-written review which really "nails" a book, or laughing over a ridiculous "panning" of what would turn out to be a great classic.

My only MAJOR criticism of this book is that it includes almost NO science fiction whatsoever. Besides being one of my personal favorite genres of literature, there are just some great all-around WRITERS missing here: Philip K. Dick, Olaf Stapledon, Alfred Bester, HG Wells, and many more. I mean, I can understand that "Books of the Century" wasn't thousands of pages long, and obviously couldn't include EVERYTHING, but leaving out an entire GENRE of literature? I seriously question the editors' judgment on this omission (and that's why I give "Books of the Century" four stars instead of five)!

Besides that problem, which can be solved by checking out David Pringle's "The Ultimate Guide to Science Fiction," I strongly recommend "Books of the Century." The New York Times Book Review section is a national treasure, and this is a select sampling of that treasure. An excellent book for a lazy summer afternoon...enjoy!

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: If you like books and book reviews, you'll love this!
Review: If you like books (which I presume you do if you're hanging out on the Amazon.com website :)), and especially if you like book reviews (ditto!), you're going to LOVE this book. Gleaned from a century of New York Times book reviews (plus interviews and letters to the editor), "Books of the Century" gives us the some of the best in 20th century literature, as seen through the eyes of some great reviewers (e.g., WH Auden on Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings"). I can't decide which is more entertaining and edifying -- reading a well-written review which really "nails" a book, or laughing over a ridiculous "panning" of what would turn out to be a great classic.

My only MAJOR criticism of this book is that it includes almost NO science fiction whatsoever. Besides being one of my personal favorite genres of literature, there are just some great all-around WRITERS missing here: Philip K. Dick, Olaf Stapledon, Alfred Bester, HG Wells, and many more. I mean, I can understand that "Books of the Century" wasn't thousands of pages long, and obviously couldn't include EVERYTHING, but leaving out an entire GENRE of literature? I seriously question the editors' judgment on this omission (and that's why I give "Books of the Century" four stars instead of five)!

Besides that problem, which can be solved by checking out David Pringle's "The Ultimate Guide to Science Fiction," I strongly recommend "Books of the Century." The New York Times Book Review section is a national treasure, and this is a select sampling of that treasure. An excellent book for a lazy summer afternoon...enjoy!

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Oh, My! A must for book lover!
Review: This book selects hundreds of representative reviews from NYT's "Book Review". This's a great book! It reflects the taste and the trend of American (or put it boldly, contemporary) literature and lit-crit. Numerous witty articles and perspectives prevail here. While in retrospective, we can find how precise the words were to some great literature works when they were just published. Typical examples like reviews of "Ulysess" ,"The grapes of Wrath". Such reviews undoubtly testify the high-standard of NYT's review. This is a must for book lover.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Genres need not apply
Review: This kind of work makes excellent reading. If you like it, I'd recommend a subscription to The Times (of London) Literary Supplment. A great review contain a micro-education about an entire field.

And here's a note for previous reviewer of this book: the terms "genre" and "literature" are considered by many to be mutually exclusive. Very little of science fiction is of literary quality. That's one reason you don't see much of it reviewed in the New York Times, or in this book.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Genres need not apply
Review: This kind of work makes excellent reading. If you like it, I'd recommend a subscription to The Times (of London) Literary Supplment. A great review contain a micro-education about an entire field.

And here's a note for previous reviewer of this book: the terms "genre" and "literature" are considered by many to be mutually exclusive. Very little of science fiction is of literary quality. That's one reason you don't see much of it reviewed in the New York Times, or in this book.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates