Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, An

Rating:
Summary: book unbelievable
Review: Archer attempts to defend the inerrancy of the Bible by making arbitrary assumptions and by suggesting unreasonable solutions to "Bible difficutlies." These "difficulties" are in fact at times falsehoods, but Archer's presupositions prevent him from admitting the truth. The only reason his book does not deserve only one star, is that Archer is well-educated. His attempts to defend the Bible at least reflect his education. One of the worst "solutions" proposed by Archer is his explanation of II Chr. 16:1. This solution of his creates four more problems, two of which involve contradicting other scripture. For reasons completely unexplained, Archer seems oblivious to the new contradictions he has created by his solution. It should be noted also that the "encyclopedia" leaves many difficulties unmentioned. For example, in comparing I Kings 15 with II Chr. 14-16, there are four obvious discrepancies between the two accounts of the life of Asa: 1) whether Asa had peace or war during the first ten years of his reign; 2) whether Asa took down the high places; 3) how Asa's heart was perfect with the Lord all his days, while he imprisoned the Lord's prophet; 4) the dating given in II Chr. 16:1.

Archer completely neglects the first three contradictions and offers an explanation for only the last one.

Those who wish to read a more detailed critique of the book and the problem of Asa are welcome to email me for the website address of this critique.

David Zaitzeff may be reached at [e-mail]

Rating:
Summary: Could Be Much Better
Review: Dr. Archer is a scholar and a thoughtful teacher. He reads over 20 different languages and has spent a lifetime studying the Biblical text. This is an excellent book for those who believe that the Bible is a divine book written by human beings. It will not (and is not meant to) convince the skeptic. This is a book for the already convinced.

In most places Dr. Archer gives thoughtful explanations to difficult Bible passages. It will stimilate your thinking.

Rating:
Summary: Deals with some tricky theological issues
Review: I bought this book blindly - I reckoned I might need such a book at some time in the future. Whilst I have never taken it up to deal with a 'Bible difficulty' I have found it to be an excellent book in that it deals with some very tricky theological issues. Hidden in there among the explanations of bible difficulties I found the best EVER (and I have looked around a lot for years) dealing of [1] what happens to babies/children who die before they can sin (or understand their need for Christ) and [2] what happens to people who never hear of Christ. Both of these are dealt with in the Romans sections.
I have heard explanations of these issues before by many others including John Piper and John Stott but having read this book, I feel at last I have got the right explanation and it is based upon and backed up by the scriptures in question. Buy it.

Rating:
Summary: Disappointing Resource
Review: I've heard a lot of critics. We must keep in mind that critics, just like believers, are biased. They need the Bible to be untrue. They need it, because they need to live in rank sin. (Please reference RC Sproul's "If There's a God, Why are There Atheists?") I've never seen an alleged contradiction that hasn't been either resolved or enough reasonable explanations given that it remains a problem for me.

This book helps aide those who want to examine these difficulties. I do not agree with the author all of the time. I've seen others give better answers to the same questions. But I must say, when he is on, the author is spot on. And he's on a lot. The book is also not as exhaustive as I would like. My only other problem with the book is that it would have benefited from more people writing in it (to give it more of an encyclopedia feel). However, it is a wonderful resource I highly recommend. I also like how the book deals with some passages that are difficult to understand, not just alleged contradictions.

I highly suggest reading his passage on the critics of Daniel, and how these critics completely ignore the evidence to give it a late date. Why did they give the book a late dating? Because if they didn't, they would be admitting to fulfilled prophecy. That is the bias believers are up against. And that is why I feel justified in saying what I said in the first paragraph of this review.

Rating:
Summary: solid reference work
Review: I've heard a lot of critics. We must keep in mind that critics, just like believers, are biased. They need the Bible to be untrue. They need it, because they need to live in rank sin. (Please reference RC Sproul's "If There's a God, Why are There Atheists?") I've never seen an alleged contradiction that hasn't been either resolved or enough reasonable explanations given that it remains a problem for me.

This book helps aide those who want to examine these difficulties. I do not agree with the author all of the time. I've seen others give better answers to the same questions. But I must say, when he is on, the author is spot on. And he's on a lot. The book is also not as exhaustive as I would like. My only other problem with the book is that it would have benefited from more people writing in it (to give it more of an encyclopedia feel). However, it is a wonderful resource I highly recommend. I also like how the book deals with some passages that are difficult to understand, not just alleged contradictions.

I highly suggest reading his passage on the critics of Daniel, and how these critics completely ignore the evidence to give it a late date. Why did they give the book a late dating? Because if they didn't, they would be admitting to fulfilled prophecy. That is the bias believers are up against. And that is why I feel justified in saying what I said in the first paragraph of this review.

Rating:
Summary: The old-time standard for Bible difficulties
Review: I've used this book for almost 2 decades now, and it remains one of my favorites in the field of Bible difficulties. Archer did a super job giving explanations for difficult passages found in the Bible. Although I have never read the book cover from cover, I've probably read enough of it to count for 3-4 readings! I consider Archer's use of the context of the passage, the Biblical languages, and other pertinent information exemplary. Rarely do I find that I disagree with his assessment, so I give this book my highest endorsement. Another good book of this genre is When Critics Ask by Geisler and Howe. It has been fun for me to compare Archer and Geisler/Howe when they discuss the same passages (which happens more often than not). Again, I highly recommend this book for a research tool in the serious Christian's library.

Rating:
Summary: Well done, but not satisfactory.
Review: The Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties answers many allegeddiscrepancies in the Bible with amazing insight and backgroundresearch. Yet many serious problems exist with the work, most importantly in its attempts answer some critical discrepancies through very inadequate reasoning and scholarship. Furthermore, the theory of biblical inerrancy is intimately presupposed throughout the book, especially in the opening sentences of the Introduction, which will serve to explain why these problems exist.

In explaining the story of the Centurion and Jesus, the author takes two paragraphs to try to establish and reconcile the discrepancy. Who came to see Jesus, the centurion or his slave? This conflict is then easily reconciled. However, this is not at all the nature of the discrepancy. A careful reading of Matthew 8 and Luke 7 reveals that the true discrepancy regards whether it was the centurion who visited Jesus, or whether it was Jewish elders and friends--not the slave--whom the Centurion sent on his behalf. The third and final paragraph vaguely begins to address the true discrepancy, but hardly adequately. One may wonder if the author was paying attention to the gospel texts. Worse than that, this reader suspects that the author decided to make an intellectual pretense of an explanation for the sake of concerned readers having crises of faith. Problems like this occur throughout the book, and even one such problem immediately threatens to refute the entire thesis.

These problems seem traceable to the beliefs and scholastic methods of the author, as seen in the section called Recommended Procedures in Dealing with Bible Difficulties, which is located before the Introduction. Readers are first and foremost admonished to be fully convinced that there exists some explanation for every discrepancy, even if no explanation is readily available, because the Bible is written by God. With this conviction held--with inerrancy devoutly believed--readers will have no reason to question his proposed reconciliations of discrepancies. Which is more in keeping with conscience: to remain fully committed to the theory of inerrancy, or to grant the Bible complete freedom of expression?

Skeptics and Liberal Christians should read this book for two reasons. They can see the limits of Conservative scholarship manifest in it, as well as be confronted and challenged by some startlingly good defenses for inerrancy that are often prematurely dismissed or rejected by average non-Conservative scholars and readers. This reader does feel that the book is superior to common Liberal works, yet lacks the overall credibility of the more balanced, Liberal-Evangelical Christian Faith and apologetics of C. S. Lewis, which this reader shares.

Rating:
Summary: Pathetic
Review: This book is fine if you're preaching to the choir. Any intelligent person can see through it in a minute. Read a little Dennis McKinsey. Much of his stuff is free on the net, but he has two books out. He blows Archer's arguments away like lint.

Rating:
Summary: A disappointment
Review: This has got to be the best apologetic I've read to date. The author tries to address a skeptic's real questions, and displays a great deal of knowledge and scholarship throughout the book. And he does solve some of the Bible's difficulties. Nevertheless, as my 2-star rating indicates, there are problems with the book. Aside from the fact that he has missed some significant problems with the Bible, I have found serious errors in facts and in reasoning throughout the book. The book aims to convince skeptics (as it says on the back), but I'm afraid that it has not succeeded with this skeptic. My advice is: read this only if you are already familiar with the historical and archaeological knowledge of the times in question, and can judge the arguments for yourself.