Rating: 
Summary: Intriguing Concept Gets You Thinking
Review: Take the time to throroughly read (then re-read) this conversation.Humanism has a foothold in America today largely due to seemingly logical arguments that truly don't hold up when put through the tests of human experience, historical record and even unscientific realities, such as faith. This is a short book for any thinking person that wants to evaluate Christianity as it compares to the other major world views.
Rating: 
Summary: Fun, but why not buy a book by the real Lewis or Huxley?
Review: The Overview: This is one of a recent slew of books that deal with hypothetical conversations between great people, such as Ravi Zacharias's "Lotus and the Cross" which is a conversation between Jesus and Buddha, or Truman Madsen's "Five Classics" which has a hypothetical conversation between Joseph Smith and a mother with a blind baby. They provide a vehicle for translating the philosophy into practical reality of day-to-day life and pain. Of course the godfather of all these dialogues is Plato. The power and charm of this method of presentation is that it takes what is oftentimes an ethereal philosophical concept and translates it to realistic situations, such as the price of tomatoes or why I am hurting. The Idea: Due to an odd coincidence, President John F. Kennedy, Dr. C. S. Lewis, and Aldous Huxley died on the same day: 22 November 1963. Dr. Kreeft imagines what happens in the afterlife as these three men meet and interact. In a Socratic sense, Kreeft uses these three men to elaborate the three types of Christianity present today: Lewis and the traditional Christianity; Kennedy and the modern Christianity; and Huxley and the mystical Christianity. The real question behind all of the words and wrangling is the divinity of Christ. When that doctrine goes, everything else uniquely Christian soon falls, so the afterlife discussion is of capital importance for Christians. We allow people the freedom to believe whatever they want to believe, but there is commitment to the truth along with the commitment to good feelings and respect for other people. The main thrust of the book is to show by logic that Christ was in fact divine. These arguments are great apologetic scaffolding prior to gaining a personal witness. We sometimes get caught up in the idea that religion is solely and affair of the heart, but this book reminds us that God also gave us a brain, and that has a bearing on how and what we worship. By the way, Gov. Jesse Ventura once remarked "Organized religion is a sham and a crutch for weak-minded people who need strength in numbers." I wonder how well and how long the Hon. Gov.
Ventura would stand in a debate with Dr. Peter Kreeft? The Book: The prose is an easy read. Peter Kreeft is one of these rare people who combine laser logic with righteous wit! That is what makes this book not only challenging but enchanting. The text is formatted like a script or play, so it is easy to keep track of who is talking and you can keep the characters and ideas straight. I guess if he wanted to, this book could make a frictionless transition to TV or VHS. The story is presented in one long act, with ample sidebar summaries to help you keep the arguments ordered, although I wonder if it would have been better to divide the text into scenes or acts to help punctuated the discussion. The cover-art is classic, and I hope they keep the same picture on every edition--it helps to see these three great men together as we weigh their ideas and viewpoints. My religion (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints) does not have a strong apologetics tradition per se: we say, "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God" (James 1:5), and be honest with the answer you get to your prayer. So it was fascinating to read the book and understand the sophisticated logic behind what Kreeft another others believe, the logical reason why he believes in the divinity of Christ.
Rating:
Summary: AUT DEUS AUT HOMO MALUS
Review: This is a very clever book. C.S. Lewis, Aldous Huxley (representing New Age thinking), and JFK (representing the basic modern humanist) meet up somewhere "between Heaven and Hell." Why these three? They all died on the same day. Huxley *was* pretty new age-y and JFK *was* basically a humanist, but these tendencies are exaggerated for effect here. Still, what they say is totally believable and not much different than what I hear on a daily basis. Of course, as might be expected, specialists and fans of both will complain, but oh well. This book is short and light and the pure dialog format makes for quick and easy reading. I read this book for the first time in High School and even now as a graduate student in Philosophy at a Big 12 school I am still using the same basic arguments only infused with years of study, experience, and meditation. I can't think of a better introduction to the art of Apologetics. The central argument is the Lord, Liar, Lunatic one from Lewis's _Mere Christianity_. However, they also discuss the nature of true religion, the historical reliability of the NT, the nature of hope and morality. Just over 100 pages, you can read this in one setting and will want to read it over and over again.
Rating:
Summary: AUT DEUS AUT HOMO MALUS
Review: This is a very clever book. C.S. Lewis, Aldous Huxley (representing New Age thinking), and JFK (representing the basic modern humanist) meet up somewhere "between Heaven and Hell." Why these three? They all died on the same day. Huxley *was* pretty new age-y and JFK *was* basically a humanist, but these tendencies are exaggerated for effect here. Still, what they say is totally believable and not much different than what I hear on a daily basis. Of course, as might be expected, specialists and fans of both will complain, but oh well. This book is short and light and the pure dialog format makes for quick and easy reading. I read this book for the first time in High School and even now as a graduate student in Philosophy at a Big 12 school I am still using the same basic arguments only infused with years of study, experience, and meditation. I can't think of a better introduction to the art of Apologetics. The central argument is the Lord, Liar, Lunatic one from Lewis's _Mere Christianity_. However, they also discuss the nature of true religion, the historical reliability of the NT, the nature of hope and morality. Just over 100 pages, you can read this in one setting and will want to read it over and over again.
| 
