HYPERCOMPETITION

Rating:
Summary: A Case of Hyperrepetition
Review: Although this book offers a useful compilation of tools, they are hardly original. D'Aveni simply draws--if not plagiarizes--most of his insights from many other books and cases on strategy that have been out there for decades. Many of the passages in D'Aveni's book seem to have been copied from Michael Porter's infamous triology on Competitive Strategy. For example, when D'Aveni lists the strongholds that a company can establish, he lists the very same Entry Barriers that Michael Porter listed in his book over a decade ago. Furthermore, most of the examples that are listed in the book are examples of companies that D'Aveni found in HBS cases--and not his own original case studies.

D'Aveni argues in his book that the environment in which companies compete has transformed into a hypercompetitive environment that breaks all the traditional rules of competition. This hypercompetitive environment has made it more difficult for companies to compete in the marketplace. He also argues that traditional frameworks (e.g., Porter's 5 Forces) of analysis are inadequate and that he has developed a new revolutionary set of analytical tools. However, there are two major flaws in D'Aveni's reasoning:

1. The nature of competition has always been this way. Granted, companies have become more sophisticated and faster when it comes to implementation, but this is simply an evolution and not a revolution.

2. Traditional tools of analysis are not static instruments that only look at a static competitive environment. They are only static, if you use them in such a way, e.g., Porter's 5 forces analysis can be used to evaluate multi-period competitive responses...

Finally, D'Aveni tries to develop his own analytical framework, which he calls the new 7 S's. But D'Aveni needs to do more than just try to associate his model with McKinsey's old 7 S's model. Although some of his S's are useful, most of his model (e.g., "strategic soothsaying") is not very intuitive or useful for critical analysis of an indust! ry.

In conclusion, D'Aveni's book disappoints because it offers seldomly original insights. If you are looking for more "revolutionary" material consider "Value Migration", "The Profit Zone", Michael Porter's trilogy, Jefferey Ellis' classical treay, or Jean-Pierre Jeannet's book on Global Strategies.

Rating:
Summary: Hypercompetition has proven to be a highly useful text.
Review: Contrary to some of the more pedantic opionions noted here, Richard D'Aveni's book on Hypercometition has proven to be highly useful in our strategic planning process. While it is true that one may adapt Porter's traditional approaches, Hypercompetition stimulates more focused thought on the competition - who they are, how you can take them out, etc. Deliberately planning to confront, outwit, and defeat your opponent has been decidedly lacking in modern business lore as of late - the current Microsoft case not withstanding. Hypercompetition may not be the sole game in town, but it gives everyone else a run for their money.

Rating:
Summary: First clear definition of modern competition
Review: D'Aveni manages to convey and explain the current competitive environment. Why nobody has defined it so easily before, I don't understand (everything is simple after you've had it explained to you).

The great thing about D'Aveni, is that he in principle challenges the Porter's and Ansoff's of this world, and explains that competition today is intense, not very well-ordered and competitive advantages is fleeting and has to be constantly renewed. In short, this is the first book in Strategy that I've read and immediately felt at home with. You can't loose, buy it, read it and contemplate it. If you don't agree with its main theme, you're probably of a dying breed of managers, otherwise you need this book to make sense of the competitive landscape of today.

Rating:
Summary: Excellent, gets to the heart of true competitive advantage.
Review: D'Aveni's view of competition in our global era is right on. Few competitive advantages are truly sustainable, and long-term strategic planning is ineffective. The only long-term sustainable competitive advantage comes from a firm's ability to create short-term advantages that span across numerous competitive arenas - from cost/quality, to know-how, to various types of stronghold positions, to financial muscle. How is that accomplished? By continually disrupting the status quo, changing the rules of the game, by taking an industry in new directions in which competitors' strengths become irrelevant. Strong recommend: lengthy book but "executive summary" is in the 35 page Introduction. Short form paperback version coming out?

Rating:
Summary: LET"S COME UP WITH AN IMPRESSIVE TITLE TO OVERCOME TRITENESS
Review: Did you ever wonder how these guys sit around and come up with a title that will make them feel good when they are introduced at a dinner of pinhead academics? "Good evening, please let me introduce you to John Doe, author of Managing the Dynamics of ever-changing paradigms in cross-functional systemic horseshoes." WOW! This guy must be smart!

I only got about 2/3 thru this book before I gave up. Every time I turned a page I felt myself saying, "Yeah, right!".

If it is possible to be trite and nauseatingly academic at the same time, this book does a magnificent job of accomplishing both.

Rating:
Summary: LET"S COME UP WITH AN IMPRESSIVE TITLE TO OVERCOME TRITENESS
Review: Did you ever wonder how these guys sit around and come up with a title that will make them feel good when they are introduced at a dinner of pinhead academics? "Good evening, please let me introduce you to John Doe, author of Managing the Dynamics of ever-changing paradigms in cross-functional systemic horseshoes." WOW! This guy must be smart!

I only got about 2/3 thru this book before I gave up. Every time I turned a page I felt myself saying, "Yeah, right!".

If it is possible to be trite and nauseatingly academic at the same time, this book does a magnificent job of accomplishing both.

Rating:
Summary: Must have.
Review: The strategy challenge is "to know all gurus, but to follow none". You need to resolve your own strategy paradoxes by creatively combining aspects from different approches. There is no one best way to make strategy. However, D'Aveni offers training manual for managers to formulate the desired strategy. Excellent. MUST HAVE.

Rating:
Summary: Must have.
Review: The strategy challenge is "to know all gurus, but to follow none". You need to resolve your own strategy paradoxes by creatively combining aspects from different approches. There is no one best way to make strategy. However, D'Aveni offers training manual for managers to formulate the desired strategy. Excellent. MUST HAVE.