<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: Review of Knapp's "Lie groups: beyond an introduction." Review: The short version: this is a superbly written and conceived book; if I had to learn this material (the basic theory of structure and representation of Lie algebras and groups, especially semimsimple ones) from a single book, this is the one I'd choose, among those I've seen. If you know the basics of abstract algebra and some very basic concepts from topology and manifolds, and you want to learn this material, use this book. It would be a good reference, too, as it is easy to find things in it, and takes a fairly modern, sophisticated approach (without sacrificing motivation and intuition).The long version, if you want more convincing or details: I have used several books recently in learning the structure and representation theory of Lie algebras and groups (especially Humphreys' Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory, Fulton and Harris' "Representation Theory," Varadarajan's "Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations.") Although I came to Knapp's book with a decent background from the others, I think it's the best pedagogically, for someone with a modicum of mathematical sophistication and some basics like abstract algebra and an idea of what a smooth manifold is), and a smattering of Lie theory. Some examples of the book's strength: Elementary but potentially confusing concepts (like complexification, real forms, field extensions) are explained thoroughly but in a sophisticated way, rather than viewed as obvious. Carefully chosen examples motivate and clarify the general theory; consequently even though the book is completely rigorous, and carefully delineates lemmas, proofs, remarks, definitions, and the like, it seems less dry then some others (e.g. Varadarajan, from my point of view). But the point of the examples, and their relation to the general theory, is made clear, so they do not provide an overload of detail or b obscure the main structure. Thought is always given to the reader's understanding, not just to logical correctness, though the author also takes the point of view, with which I concur, that logical clarity and sufficient detail are essential to understanding. Relations between ideas, alternative proofs, and the structure of the theory to come are discussed thoroughly, but such discussion is clearly demarcated from the main structure of the argument, so that the latter is never obscured. This is a fantastic book, and exactly what I was looking for. Whether you are learning the material for the first time, or want to review it or refer to, it is a superb source.
Rating: Summary: Review of Knapp's "Lie groups: beyond an introduction." Review: The short version: this is a superbly written and conceived book; if I had to learn this material (the basic theory of structure and representation of Lie algebras and groups, especially semimsimple ones) from a single book, this is the one I'd choose, among those I've seen. If you know the basics of abstract algebra and some very basic concepts from topology and manifolds, and you want to learn this material, use this book. It would be a good reference, too, as it is easy to find things in it, and takes a fairly modern, sophisticated approach (without sacrificing motivation and intuition). The long version, if you want more convincing or details: I have used several books recently in learning the structure and representation theory of Lie algebras and groups (especially Humphreys' Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory, Fulton and Harris' "Representation Theory," Varadarajan's "Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations.") Although I came to Knapp's book with a decent background from the others, I think it's the best pedagogically, for someone with a modicum of mathematical sophistication and some basics like abstract algebra and an idea of what a smooth manifold is), and a smattering of Lie theory. Some examples of the book's strength: Elementary but potentially confusing concepts (like complexification, real forms, field extensions) are explained thoroughly but in a sophisticated way, rather than viewed as obvious. Carefully chosen examples motivate and clarify the general theory; consequently even though the book is completely rigorous, and carefully delineates lemmas, proofs, remarks, definitions, and the like, it seems less dry then some others (e.g. Varadarajan, from my point of view). But the point of the examples, and their relation to the general theory, is made clear, so they do not provide an overload of detail or b obscure the main structure. Thought is always given to the reader's understanding, not just to logical correctness, though the author also takes the point of view, with which I concur, that logical clarity and sufficient detail are essential to understanding. Relations between ideas, alternative proofs, and the structure of the theory to come are discussed thoroughly, but such discussion is clearly demarcated from the main structure of the argument, so that the latter is never obscured. This is a fantastic book, and exactly what I was looking for. Whether you are learning the material for the first time, or want to review it or refer to, it is a superb source.
<< 1 >>
|