Protein Bioinformatics : An Algorithmic Approach to Sequence and Structure Analysis

Rating:
Summary: Good intro, but light presentation
Review: This book gives good, basic coverage of the concepts important in understanding protein sequence and structure.

There are three major sections in this book: sequence, structure, and the relatinship between the two. The sequence section covers all the basics: dynamic programming for string matching, scoring matrices, trees and classification, and profiles of various sorts. The sequence discussion is a bit shorter, but goes over substructures, similarity searching and scoring, and kinds of structures and domains. The third section is even shorter and unites the two areas: predicting structure from sequence, with a good introduction to threading.

The book's strength is its breadth. It sacrifices depth to get that breadth, though. A few analytic techniques are sketched in the text or presented in psuedocode. Most often, however, a programmer will have a hard time gleaning enough detail from this to implement any of the algorithms described.

The authors aim at readers who already understand the significance of protein structure and who are comfortable with ideas like hydrogen bonding. Lots of programmers will have a hard time understanding why problems are important or what the driving phenomena are. Biologists won't be put off by an excessively mathematical treatment, but won't get a detailed understanding of the algorithms or mathematical foundations either. This book comes close to under-serving both kinds of reader.

This book is good for conceptual understanding of the algorithms, where implementable details don't matter, and gives good coverage to protein-specific issues. It's decidedly for someone who wants more than just the how-to of running BLAST or strucuture analysis tools. I think this book will help most if you want more understanding of what goes on inside the tools, or if you want an easy start to a deep and complex topic. Advanced readers may not like it, though - detail and real understanding just aren't there. I give this one four stars, but I had to round up to four.

//wiredwerid