<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: More-of-the-same:An incoherent mishmash of training gimmicks
Review: I concur with one of the reviewer's from Seattle...this book exploits the whole intent of dialogue, turning it into yet another training tool and management consulting technique. The deeper and more illuminating aspects of dialogue, its potential for a true metanoia, are lost to a bunch of eclectic little structured exercises for people to perform in training sessions. It seems their book reflects a modern phenomena, particularly evident in the management consulting world, where truly fresh insights and new approaches to inquiry that could potentially open up the mind, are dumbed down, commodified, and technique-ized, and trivialized in the effort to mass market them. This book will appeal to those who want another tool in their tool-box, but not to those who are genuinely seeking an authentic exploration of dialogue, where no paths or techniques are imposed on the mind in advance.
Rating: 
Summary: not a ground breaker, but a worthwhile read
Review: Many people have the sense that all is not as it should be in organizations today and are experiencing an underlying ache of discontent. The new sciences are heralding an increase in the speed and complexity of our lives and work, yet we gaze at the approaching new century while still mired in the old. Our accumulated ways of thinking, belief systems, norms, values, and shared meanings take us away from what we say we want most from organizational life: high productivity, satisfying relationships, meaningful work. Ellinor and Gerard have given voice, order and argument to that which seems to be uncommon common sense. For those of us who are committed to promoting and supporting organizational efforts for equity and valuing diversity, their representation of the power tool of dialogue renews the urgency of doing the work deeper and better with our clients, and with each other.
Rating:
Summary: not a ground breaker, but a worthwhile read
Review: This book is not an eye-opener, it appears to be going over ground that has been covered before. But for those of us who are grappling with the concept of utilizing DIALOG in organizational change and development, an approach that skims the surface, explains the benefits and touches on different issues while pointing you to a place where you can do more research is probably more useful than an in-depth study of the more esoteric features.
Rating:
Summary: Useful stuff
Review: This book was a much more detailed exploration of the topic of dialog. It began with a scattered, pretty useless dialog between some academics and consultants transcribed from a group phone call they made. I found this painful to get through as it was a real collage of different ideas and their latest 'thoughts' they all needed to share. They didn't seem to be talking 'to' each other, but that was probably due to the fact that they were on the phone and that they are all so full of ideas on the subject that they couldn't help but blabber on and on when they each had a chance. While it avoided a lot of the 'metaphysical' aspects of Dialog (as compared with the previous book - "Spiritual Art of Dialog" that I read before this), it did tend to oversimplify problems in the workplace a bit in my opinion. The first parts of the book offered some great tips on how to engage in, and maintain a positive dialog. It talked about intentions as being very important, and suspending one's own assumptions and judgments that were useful. It also stressed the importance of being a good listener and asking good questions. There were few tips on how to gauge nonverbal queues, which I think would have been useful, but there were a lot of suggested activities to get better at it. The point I think they were making were that nonverbal queues are specific to individuals and can't be readily identified generally. There was talk of inquiry (asking questions) and also of reflection (taking moments and going slowly) which was also interesting. Then the part of the book that most interested me were the practical tips that management could take to implement better dialog in the workplace. Although they were very skeptical of it working in long-term ways in most circumstances, which took away from the authority of the book, and in that way they seemed to undermine what they were advocating. There was also discussion of group evolution dynamics, and the four stages of a group. They did get slightly metaphysical in talking about mysterious group energies and such, but I took it all with a grain of salt. The idea of shared leadership seemed powerful if properly implemented, but they also pointed out some very dangerous aspects that can go along with implementing it and that should be watched for.
<< 1 >>
|
