<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Maria Bartiromo, I Give You A Big, Fat F For Incompetence!!!
Review:
It comes as no surprise that a "reporter", who's regularly and tyrannically solicited on the financial viewing public as the...(I'm not making this up for those who may not be familiar with her disparaging nickname)..."MONEY HONEY", offers disgracefully basic advice so simple, that it's just as empty and hollow as her on-air "sincerity" and demeanor! This anchor and, suddenly, for reasons so mysterious they'll never be divulged, this "author", has always illegitimately trudged further in her artificial career by relying more on her purportedly good looks and youth, rather than on actual establishment-behind her nightmarishly cosmetic front--in business and investment fields, which she and, in cahoots with her, CNBC, unrelentingly and oppressively insist on.
Potential readers will be-according to CNBC's plan of tyrannizing her "looks" over substance on unsuspectingly naive people-duped into parting with their cash on this sup-par accident because Bartiromo looks doubtfully "hot", as, and this is unfortunate, she's apparently seen to an alarmingly severe demographic of lost souls who watch CNBC. For an author's credibility, it's miserable when your only grudging claim to legitimacy are pressured sales which stem from mislead wrongdoers feeling tragically and insidiously "in love" with her. She's not qualified, even if you don't repugnantly easily examine the painfully appalling holes in reasoning in her "book".
This can be proven by checking her credentials to find that, shockingly and shabbily, her majored subject in university was ONLY JOURNALISM. With those brittle "qualifications", it appears that CNBC's standards are so lowered that they'll defraud for a base journalist to already be able to cover a specific area of expertise, which, as per her credentials, she is NOT educated in. In the interest of "fair disclosure" (a mantra CNBC's been wearing down since the Enron and WCOM scandals broke, in a hardened bid to distance themselves from the liability of hatefully pushing those companies before the scandals were unmasked) Bartiromo did MINOR in economics. She doesn't hold an esteemed degree of any kind, be it BD, MBA, MD or PHD, to justify her inexcusably limited exposure to business education. If you investigate the suspect activities she's involved in outside of her PR crusade on CNBC, you can gather for yourself that her "career", unfortunately like most positions in the white-collar world, is furthered along by hypocritically sucking up to co-workers and people in higher hierarchy to connive with them. This is proven by her objectionably virulent presence in all things from presenting the Columbus Day Parade for the past five years to misconducting "Principal of the Day" stints at NYC schools, shirking her job. For annoyingly more incrimination, before coming to CNBC, she unworthily worked as a PRODUCER at CNN's business news!!!!
Now the reprehensibly lightweight "content". It's fraud for this to be marketed by Bartiromo's antagonism as a guide to how people can sift through financial information to have the best sense of how a stock will perform. Recalling CNBC's feloniously eroding viewership by 50% from early 2000's monstrous "irrational exuberance" fanaticism, ruthless shortcomings in predicting this 3-year BEAR market's end, and heavy bias in forging fake bear trap rallies as being an actual bottom and always procuring prejudicially bullish fund managers and analysts to misdirect viewers on their programs, that falsehood from Bartiromo amounts to shameless blasphemy. The ensuing catastrophically contraband "advice" is so humiliatingly basic that A) you don't need training to implement it, or B) you already know it!!!! One needs at least a fundamental initiation to performance history, forward looking statements, quarterly updates, seasonal patterns of strength and weakness, company research and TA to just start to have an understanding of taking stock. It's bloody desecration for Bartiromo to profane that understanding the market simply takes "doing your homework"!!!! Analysis is unrelentingly freely available on certain investment-related websites, and the plot of selling different Web sites contained in this book as "information", is so condemnably laughable that anyone with the minutest exposure to the internet could find them.
Another shrewd equivocation is the sensationalistic claim that Bartiromo "analyzes" what the relevant information is to separate the "noise from the investment nuggets". On-air, Bartiromo's questions to CEOs, analysts and managers are so disorganized, superficially bypassing and evilest of all, always manipulated in a definitively bullish-partisan direction, that there's no plausibility she can impersonate this. The braindead inessentials that are disguised as "information" are so amateurishly bottom-feeding, they're the equivalent to basic common sense, like not believing all you hear on TV, and doing your own research. DUH, Bartiromo!!!!
Another disquieting aspect is who she "talks to" to procure her "advice"-all the worst self-interested and unjustly one-sided stigmas in modern trading, namely CEOs, analysts...and then money managers to appallingly complete this list of the meanest in a rogue's gallery. Because these unprincipled job titles have a resentful self-interest in longing stocks, the "advice" will be unquestionably skewed into an unethically bullish exaggeration by ALL those operatives, since CEOs will be fired for not increasing their company's stock price, analysts are in cahoots with CEOs due to the perks bribed by CEOs and money managers are extorted to only hold stock in one direction, always buying, because of the suffocative way funds are established, mostly outlawing selling. This is an impropriety also with reporters of markets-as CNBC itself is culpably implicated in having a hostile self-interest for unreasonably extremist bullishness. They relentlessly dictate false bullish bias, due to their employees benefiting from manipulating the impression of the market's course in this way, from viewership increasing (good for their pay) to their own stock options from G.E. increasing (good since the majority of their funds are oppressed to long markets).
This book is so contaminated with exclusively the most prejudiced, and harshly planned in that direction, radical buy-everything sickness-an unforgivable sin in a 3-year bear run-that it reflects on the self-interested rogue's gallery that were "interviewed". As for Bartiromo's only other, single, questionably redemptive quality-her "looks"-I detest to find her pretty in any way.
Rating: 
Summary: Not as bad as some think
Review: ...I happen to think she is a very smart and charismatic woman, in addition to being strikingly beautiful. This book is aimed at investing novices...I was left pretty much clueless about investing. I relied on him to do all that. This book was a real help in those dark times. Bravo!
Rating: 
Summary: A real good book
Review: I am from Brazil, and I never had watched her TV programs. I brought the book with curiosity, due the opposite opinions of the readers.
As indicated on the title, it is how to separate noise from news. How many nuggets one can find reading tons of newspaper or hours watching TV, during a lifetime?
This is a usefull book. It should be carefully studied.How to separate nuggets and noise in this book is your first task. If you are able to do this; then you will SURELY make money in any economy!
Rating:
Summary: A real good book
Review: I am from Brazil, and I never had watched her TV programs. I brought the book with curiosity, due the opposite opinions of the readers.
As indicated on the title, it is how to separate noise from news. How many nuggets one can find reading tons of newspaper or hours watching TV, during a lifetime?
This is a usefull book. It should be carefully studied.How to separate nuggets and noise in this book is your first task. If you are able to do this; then you will SURELY make money in any economy!
Rating:
Summary: Maria Bartiromo, I Penalize You A Big, Fat F For Everything!
Review: It comes as no surprise that a "reporter", who's regularly and tyrannically solicited on the financial viewing public as the...(I'm not making this up for those who may not be familiar with her disparaging nickname)..."MONEY HONEY", offers disgracefully basic advice so simple, that it's just as empty and hollow as her on-air "sincerity" and demeanor! This anchor and, suddenly, for reasons so mysterious they'll never be divulged, this "author", has always illegitimately trudged further in her artificial career by relying more on her purportedly good looks and youth, rather than on actual establishment-behind her nightmarishly cosmetic front--in business and investment fields, which she and, in cahoots with her, CNBC, unrelentingly and oppressively insist on.Potential readers will be-according to CNBC's plan of tyrannizing her "looks" over substance on unsuspectingly naive people-duped into parting with their cash on this sup-par accident because Bartiromo looks doubtfully "hot", as, and this is unfortunate, she's apparently seen to an alarmingly severe demographic of lost souls who watch CNBC. For an author's credibility, it's miserable when your only grudging claim to legitimacy are pressured sales which stem from mislead wrongdoers feeling tragically and insidiously "in love" with her. She's not qualified, even if you don't repugnantly easily examine the painfully appalling holes in reasoning in her "book". This can be proven by checking her credentials to find that, shockingly and shabbily, her majored subject in university was ONLY JOURNALISM. With those brittle "qualifications", it appears that CNBC's standards are so lowered that they'll defraud for a base journalist to already be able to cover a specific area of expertise, which, as per her credentials, she is NOT educated in. In the interest of "fair disclosure" (a mantra CNBC's been wearing down since the Enron and WCOM scandals broke, in a hardened bid to distance themselves from the liability of hatefully pushing those companies before the scandals were unmasked) Bartiromo did MINOR in economics. She doesn't hold an esteemed degree of any kind, be it BD, MBA, MD or PHD, to justify her inexcusably limited exposure to business education. If you investigate the suspect activities she's involved in outside of her PR crusade on CNBC, you can gather for yourself that her "career", unfortunately like most positions in the white-collar world, is furthered along by hypocritically sucking up to co-workers and people in higher hierarchy to connive with them. This is proven by her objectionably virulent presence in all things from presenting the Columbus Day Parade for the past five years to misconducting "Principal of the Day" stints at NYC schools, shirking her job. For annoyingly more incrimination, before coming to CNBC, she unworthily worked as a PRODUCER at CNN's business news!!!! Now the reprehensibly lightweight "content". It's fraud for this to be marketed by Bartiromo's antagonism as a guide to how people can sift through financial information to have the best sense of how a stock will perform. Recalling CNBC's feloniously eroding viewership by 50% from early 2000's monstrous "irrational exuberance" fanaticism, ruthless shortcomings in predicting this 3-year BEAR market's end, and heavy bias in forging fake bear trap rallies as being an actual bottom and always procuring prejudicially bullish fund managers and analysts to misdirect viewers on their programs, that falsehood from Bartiromo amounts to shameless blasphemy. The ensuing catastrophically contraband "advice" is so humiliatingly basic that A) you don't need training to implement it, or B) you already know it!!!! One needs at least a fundamental initiation to performance history, forward looking statements, quarterly updates, seasonal patterns of strength and weakness, company research and TA to just start to have an understanding of taking stock. It's bloody desecration for Bartiromo to profane that understanding the market simply takes "doing your homework"!!!! Analysis is unrelentingly freely available on certain investment-related websites, and the plot of selling different Web sites contained in this book as "information", is so condemnably laughable that anyone with the minutest exposure to the internet could find them. Another shrewd equivocation is the sensationalistic claim that Bartiromo "analyzes" what the relevant information is to separate the "noise from the investment nuggets". On-air, Bartiromo's questions to CEOs, analysts and managers are so disorganized, superficially bypassing and evilest of all, always manipulated in a definitively bullish-partisan direction, that there's no plausibility she can impersonate this. The braindead inessentials that are disguised as "information" are so amateurishly bottom-feeding, they're the equivalent to basic common sense, like not believing all you hear on TV, and doing your own research. DUH, Bartiromo!!!! Another disquieting aspect is who she "talks to" to procure her "advice"-all the worst self-interested and unjustly one-sided stigmas in modern trading, namely CEOs, analysts...and then money managers to appallingly complete this list of the meanest in a rogue's gallery. Because these unprincipled job titles have a resentful self-interest in longing stocks, the "advice" will be unquestionably skewed into an unethically bullish exaggeration by ALL those operatives, since CEOs will be fired for not increasing their company's stock price, analysts are in cahoots with CEOs due to the perks bribed by CEOs and money managers are extorted to only hold stock in one direction, always buying, because of the suffocative way funds are established, mostly outlawing selling. This is an impropriety also with reporters of markets-as CNBC itself is culpably implicated in having a hostile self-interest for unreasonably extremist bullishness. They relentlessly dictate false bullish bias, due to their employees benefiting from manipulating the impression of the market's course in this way, from viewership increasing (good for their pay) to their own stock options from G.E. increasing (good since the majority of their funds are oppressed to long markets). This book is so contaminated with exclusively the most prejudiced, and harshly planned in that direction, radical buy-everything sickness-an unforgivable sin in a 3-year bear run-that it reflects on the self-interested rogue's gallery that were "interviewed". As for Bartiromo's only other, single, questionably redemptive quality-her "looks"-I detest to find her pretty in any way.
Rating:
Summary: Some things never change
Review: Simply another marketing exercise of tying a book, any book, to an attractive face with some media exposure to make some quick money. Not much difference between this and a Life Philosophy book by Vanna White or a biography of Britney Spears. The content is basic new investor instruction that you can find done better and for free at Web sites like Motley Fool and others. Very badly organized with lots of extraneous material ... this book is at least two rewrites away from an acceptable first effort. Look elsewhere, friend.
Rating:
Summary: Dry..
Review: The book is interesting in a since that it was written by a person who has been exposed to some of the most prominent people/events. On the other hand, I believe that it has very little practical use.
<< 1 >>
|
