Rating: 
Summary: I agree -- Donald Duckburger knows SQUAT!
Review: This is a great book. Welfare replaces community and family with government for the price of a few bucks a month. The result is NO guidance to prevent unwed teen mothers, crime, drugs, and no role models to inspire learning and family/community bonds. The end result is we get people very much alone just making it up as they go along (and not being very successful at it). Misguided well-intentioned welfare has increased the suffering in this country to an astronomical level. Why? Because of misguided guilt-ridden middle class and the politicians what take advantage of them. Think back to pre-welfare. You had fraternal organizations that provided guidance and charity (but not welfare and tolerance of slacking off). Everything from group health insurance, mortgages, business loans, to daycare was provided within the group. You were part of an extended family and subtle peer pressure kept you honest and provided a plan to follow. They darn sure wouldn't have allowed their sons to gang bang (most gangbanging happens because their isn't any way out). All this was replaced by government welfare. Any linking of corporate welfare (a business entity) and personal welfare is about as misguided as they come. I hate statist corporate welfare! Charity is needed -- not beurocratic welfare! Write on!
Rating:
Summary: To one-sided ....
Review: whose review is below. I cant believe that this reviewer believes that corporate "welfare" disproves the thesis of this book. How moronic can one be? The difference dear child is that corporations still are in business and trying to produce a profit. An individual on welfare does nothing to earn an income, or very little at most. Thus the incintive not to work. Corporate welfare is just as incidious in my book, but at least the corporation is trying to profit from as many revenue centers as it can.
Rating:
Summary: To one-sided ....
Review: whose review is below. I cant believe that this reviewer believes that corporate "welfare" disproves the thesis of this book. How moronic can one be? The difference dear child is that corporations still are in business and trying to produce a profit. An individual on welfare does nothing to earn an income, or very little at most. Thus the incintive not to work. Corporate welfare is just as incidious in my book, but at least the corporation is trying to profit from as many revenue centers as it can.
| 
