<< 1 >>
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A must for the student of Social Sciences Review: Along with Adam Smith, the Englishman David Ricardo is one of the fathers of the so-called Classics school of economic thought, and the Principles is his major opus, one he was very much reluctant to write, but only did so at the urgings of James Mill and his son John. Written in the first half of the 19th victorian century, he was nonetheless, a very freed mind, who did not accept or indulge in the extravagancies of the beginning of the industrialization proccess in England. To David Ricardo, Karl Marx owes a good share of his theory of labour, something essential in the labour movements of then. The concepts adapted and created by David Ricardo is transported to the text in a dry and concise style, not too much worried in polemics, but only interested in address the topics he raises in a very precise way. IF you are a student of Social Sciences, this book is a must.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Told the truth Review: David Ricardo was never one to mince words. "The opinion entertained by the labouring class, that the employment of machinery in frequently detrimental to their interests, is not founded on prejudice and error, but is comfortable to the correct principles of political economy." Unlike today, the ruling class and their intellectuals of the 19th Century were not affraid to say what they were up to.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Raw Intelligence Review: Some authors you read, and perhaps think, "I wish I'd written that!" Ricardo, like Adam Smith and John Locke, are in another league altogether. The originality of mind is stunning. Smith, Mill, Malthus and J.B. Say are all more readable, which I fear sounds like a very poor recommendation for Ricardo! Still, I was so bowled over by the originality of his theoretical line, that I forgave much slow slogging through a difficult text. His theory of rent is I think quite misguided, but is so powerfully presented that I was hard put to think how I might argue against it were Ricardo to appear before me in person. I took this book about ten pages at a time, and found it well worth the trouble.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Told the truth Review: The publisher should be convinced that the automatic spell checker should not be so heavily relied upon. The cover art is an expression of how an armchair graphic artist can be innovative with Photoshop. If a book of such high esteem be put out for public enrichment its presentation should not be so insincere.
Rating: ![2 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-2-0.gif) Summary: Divers Typos Review: The publisher should be convinced that the automatic spell checker should not be so heavily relied upon. The cover art is an expression of how an armchair graphic artist can be innovative with Photoshop. If a book of such high esteem be put out for public enrichment its presentation should not be so insincere.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Principles of Political Economy and Taxation by Ricardo Review: This work is a masterpiece of economic theory only second to the Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith. Ricardo states that value is a function of effort and not the price paid for labor. He reminded us that labor plus the tools to assist labor affected the creation of value. Therefore; increases in value were in direct proportion to increments in labor. Value was also a function of the time it took to bring the goods to market. Surprisingly, the cultivation of inferior land resulted in ahigher exchangeable value of raw produce because more labor was required in its production. If we become more efficient in land cultivation, rents will go down because more can be cultivated with less land. In addition, the exchangeable value of commodities is undisturbed by natural or accidental causes. Laborers derive their greatest pleasure when the market price of labor exceeds the natural price. Therefore; wages will increase in response to increases in the demand for labor. Rises in rent are accompanied by increments in the share of produce because landlords want more rent when harvests are greater. Accordingly, the price of corn is a function of the labor to produce it. If wages go down, then prices must fall. As the price of labor goes down, profits increase but the price of the commodity may not go down. Taxes on profits tend to increase the price of a commodity . If money is not taxed, then all commodities will be subject to price increases. Ultimately, a tax on land begets a tax on produce. In addition, a tax on labor will raise its price. In addition, the price of provisions determine the price paid to the worker. If money decreases in value, all commodities will be subject to steep price increases. This was seen in modern times with the fluctuation of the Russian currency. Ultimately, bounty lowers the price to foreigners because the government subsidizes the bounty paid to the local merchants to stimulate trade. The theory of rent transfers value but does not create it. Ultimately, wages are determined by the price of food and cost of production. This theory of wages differs from Adam Smith who said that wages were a function of the ease or hardship to do work, the difficulty or expense of learning a trade, the constancy of employment, the trust reposed in the workmen, the probability of success or failure of the venture or the fear of misfortune. David Ricardo's work is an important milestone in the theory of economics and comparison to the work of Adam Smith.
<< 1 >>
|