Rating: 
Summary: Sister Sister
Review: The Hillary Trap is a reader which exposes the failed feminist theory still being pushed by the victim fanfare of the Hillary Clan. In it are seven sections each titled with a different trap. "The sisterhood trap," "The Education Trap," "The Work Trap," etc. which are all traps utilized by Hillary and her group-thinkers to spread the disease of victimhood thinking, lesson individual responsibility and freedom, and gain more government control for "The Village," theory.
An important read for anyone who wishes to clarify the underpinnings of feminist group-thinking, victimization attitudes, or social theory concerning personal responsibility and the tacits of personal freedom.
Rating: 
Summary: BIG SISTER, HILLARY-STYLE
Review: This book is chock-full of insightful analysis and useful facts for anyone who cares about the integrity of the American political system. Is Mrs. Clinton really the best we can do in New York Democratic politics? Beyond that, does she have a record of achievement that entitles her to a Senate seat or role model status? Ingraham sees Hillary's leftist ideology as offering women nothing but a series of traps of dependency. After all, if women are truly strong and independent, they don't need Hillary or N.O.W. or some other victims' group to "protect" their rights. This isn't another tome of hate against Mrs. Clinton, it's a book that unpacks her ideas, and scrutinizes the effects of those ideas on society at large. Hillary's campaign rhetoric might sound moderate these days (she "cares" about EVERYTHING deeply), but what Laura shows us brilliantly in this book is that in the end, Hillary's policies would just have us replace Big Brother with Big Sister.
Rating: 
Summary: Poor Laura
Review: Wishes she was Hillary and just can't cut it. Poor thing. But she does what is probably the next best thing, makes some money masking her envy as "criticism" and writing about it.I just assumed Ms. Ingraham was another radio personality whose purpose on the radio was to entertain with psuedo-intellectual and political comments. And to make a few bucks. This can't be serious I thought as I tried to listen; the woman sounds totally uneducated. (What a surprise to find she had actually attended Dartmouth.) How she seems to love the sound of her own voice. She must be some entertainer doing a bit as a political analyst. No one would have the guts to expose themselves like this unless it was just a big goof. Well, I guess it isn't and her book proves that. The joke was on me.
| 
