Rating: 
Summary: Science made available to general public
Review: Rachel Carson had the ability to communicate to a broad audience. She wrote to the point but with a skill that makes reading Silent Spring enjoyable. Speaking as a scientist that reads many dry "scientific" books and journals, I found Rachel Carson to be an enjoyable, informative read.
Rating:
Summary: My Thoughts
Review: This Book that Rachel Louise Carson wrote has had a tremndous impact on my life! I love the way she put things and how she put them in her words! She is just the greatest book that I have read in a long time. Thank you Rachel Louise Carson!
Rating: 
Summary: Silent Spring was Amazing, but...
Review: Silent Spring is, without a doubt, the most amazing book I have ever read. Though it is gut-loaded with facts, Carson' s ingenious wording makes reading it a somewhat enjoyable experience. It seems as if the words had an almost surreal quality. For example one of her chapters is entitled, "Realms of the Soil," and another is, "The Earth's Green Mantle." One can tell that this is her style of writing because she also used such titles in her other books such as Under the Sea Wind. With this style, the drawbacks are that about every sentence is difficult to understand, with few I completely did not understand at all. Then again, I am just a preteen; Silent Spring was intended for adults to read, comprehend, and then heed its warning. I most definitely can see why the people of the 1960's were so moved by this single book, for I could have almost be fooled to thinking that it was a piece of classic fictional literature when I began reading it. This book was also quite informative, as I was appalled by some of the actual events mentioned, like the story of a factory or warehouse that polluted the water around it so much that over time, the menagerie of chemicals bonded to form an additional one. It is true that Carson exaggerated a bit, but the point is, her message was sent far beyond a person's imagination. Silent Spring was the smoking gun against chemical toxins. Anyhow, I thoroughly enjoyed Silent Spring, and at times I found it hard to put down. After all, I did not give it such a high rating for nothing.
Rating:
Summary: Classic of the environmentalist movement.
Review: Man's attempt to control environment and nature was born out of arrogance and has its roots in a primitive stage of biology that assumed that nature exists for man to do as he will with it. Carson calls the use of chemicals to control plants and insects a stone age method. She proposes a variety of biological solutions to the insect problems and more effort to study them instead of resorting to the chemical menace. She describes how the screwworm that afflicts livestock and wild animals was eliminated in Florida, after first being tested on an island, by releasing irradiated sterile male flies. Other biological efforts described are the use of artificial lures, ultrasound, bacterial infections, importing natural enemies like spiders, ants, and the use of small mammals. The above is the conclusion of this classic work that was a huge stepping stone in environmentalism that grew in the 1960's and 70's and owed much of its impetus to this scientist who chapter by chapter unveils the follies of chemical spraying as a means of attacking a particular insect or plant with no regard to the consequences.
Rating:
Summary: Valuable then and now
Review: The book's enduring message is that solutions to complex problems need to be enhanced over time because there is no one 'silver bullet' solution that satisfies all boundary conditions. In this case, DDT poses direct health threats to humans while it indirectly provides health benefits by eliminating carriers of malaria. Tradeoffs like this are now part of the awareness of Americans because of Carson's book. So don't blame the book--look for new solutions to this problem, e.g., new pesticides. This'll be easy in the coming 50 years because selective chemical attack will be possible due to enhanced knowledge of insect and human genomes and the proteins they code. And another enduring message is evident from reading the prior reviews: There is no single solution that ought to be uniformly applied throughout the world. In other words, threats active in America (DDT/bird extinction) are not the same threats active or dominant in many places in the third world (malaria dominates). It's too easy to look for one single solution to be uniformly applied. And it's silly to think one exists. So this book was valuable then for raising awareness of environmental tampering, and it's valuable now because we need to be reminded to continue to deal with it using new technology and in nonuniform and situation-dependent ways.
Rating:
Summary: A Beginning
Review: I was disappointed to say the least of some of the following reviews of Silent Spring. It is no wonder that our earth is being so abused. Yes, Virginia, there is an environmental problem. Unfortunately, it is undeniable. The earth IS fragile (God-created or not), chemicals DO persist in the environment, and we "environmentalists" are NOT Marxists. You see, the significance of Rachel Carson's book was not its scientific accuracy, nor the position it took on DDT. Its significance was that it helped to turn national, even global, consiousness in a different direction. Suddenly we were not the only species on the planet. The steps we take to improve ourselves actually have an impact on the rest of the world...on our own environment. Everyday we make compromises. Ban pesticides, eat a hamburger. Both have significant impacts on the health and hunger of those less fortunate. We help one, we hurt another, whether individuals, businesses, species, or nations. There are few easy ways out. With our tendency to ignore long-term consequences, both negative and positive, it is easy to argue forcibly against such activists as Rachel Carson. Short-term results are nearly absent when we seriously consider securing the future of the earth. But shouldn't this security be a universal goal? So read Rachel Carson's Silent Spring and be moved as she feels the groanings of the earth and speaks out on their behalf. Thank you, Rachel, for having that courage, for opening that door.
Rating: 
Summary: Mother of all junk science "environmentalism"
Review: Over 35 years ago, this book, which would give aid and comfort to all those who would destroy our way of life, was written. Consider how the advocates of a certain policy (i.e. banning of pesticides) will skew "scientific" data to support a pre-ordained conclusion. A fine example of that in this book would be the "finding" of thin eagle eggshells, due to (we're told) DDT. Not mentioned was the diet fed to the mother eagles in the study, one containing only 20% of their normal, natural calcium intake. Stop for a minute to think about how many millions of lives in the world were saved from malaria by DDT - and how many that were not saved since banning it. But, to the new "environmental" Marxists, what's a few million human lives in the battle to enslave all of humanity? Those who have written to praise this monument to junk science ought to consider the harm done by polemics such as this. This same sentiment is in control of the EPA today. One need only look at the environment of former Soviet satellite nations of Eastern Europe to see what a disaster totalitarian governments (with no oversight) have made. Continue along our current course of Washington-dominated command-and-control bureaucratic decision-making (as well as more government funded and controlled "science"), and we will have a dirtier and more unhealthy world, with lower life expectancy for everyone. Undoubtedly, such an outcome would be praised as "fair" by our would-be dictators.
Rating:
Summary: Silent Spring is for the birds
Review: This is one of the most influential books of our time. Even now, it contributes to the death of one child every 12 seconds, mostly in the Third World, because it helped to bring about the ban of DDT with a resulting resurgence of malaria and other insect-borne diseases. Entomologist G. Gordon Edwards wrote: ``In 1962, Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, and because of my 25 years of nature study I expected to be delighted....It didn't take long to learn that she had filled the book with great numbers of untruthful things. Vice President Al Gore has stated that Rachel Carson turned his life around. She turned mine around, too, but in the opposite direction,...from an 'environmentalist' to a scientist with a desire to keep truth in science and environmentalism.'' Audubon magazine refused to publish the other side of the DDT story and accused Edwards of being in the pay of the pesticide industry. He won a libel suit against them. In fact, many scientists were going along with the anti-DDT propaganda in order to get paid for flawed experiments. DDT was actually good for birds. There is a vast amount of material to refute assertions to the contrary. Bird counts in 1960 (after DDT) vs. 1941 (before DDT) showed 12 times more robins, 21 times more cowbirds, 38 times more blackbirds, 131 times more grackles, etc. Possible protective effects include: increasing plant yields; increasing protective cover; eliminating mosquito-borne bird diseases; and inducing liver enzymes that break down naturally occurring environmental toxins and carcinogens. It was said that DDT was killing eagles and other predatory birds. In fact, eagles were endangered long before DDt was discovered. Yes, eggshells were thinner in birds that were fed DDT--but only when the birds were also deprived of calcium. DDT does NOT undergo biomagnification in the food chain. Scientists "proved" that it does by comparing concentrations in hawk brains with that in fish muscle. Comparing muscle with muscle shows no such effect. DDT does not persist for a long time in the environment. In 38 days, 92% of the DDT in a sealed container of sea water disappeared. One can "find" DDT--in samples sealed decades before DDT was discovered-- by using methods that detect interfering substances found in fluorescent light ballast or plastic tubing. It is true that in one experiment "DDT-fed mice developed cancers"--but the control animals that were NOT fed DDT developed almost 25% MORE cancers. Dr. Edwards is so convinced of DDT's safety that he used to eat a tablespoon of DDT powder at the beginning of every speech. In 1971, Robert and Louise Loibl took a capsule of 10 mg of DDT (a full year's intake for an average American) every day for 3 months without ill effect. Rachel Carson dedicated her book to Albert Schweitzer, who said ``Man has lost the capacity to foresee and to forestall. He will end by destroying the earth.'' ``Miss Carson knew,'' Edwards states, that ``he was referring to atomic warfare when she quoted that, but she implied that he meant there were deadly hazards from pesticides such as DDT. I got a copy of Schweitzer's autobiography to see if he really mentioned DDT. He did, writing (p. 262): 'How much labor and waste of time these wicked insects do cause us...but a ray of hope, in the use of DDT, is now held out to us'.'' The ban on DDT was based on a tissue of lies and half truths, for which Rachel Carson must be held partly responsible. Babies are being sacrificed for the welfare of the birds--and they are dying in vain.
Rating:
Summary: Help for a french reader
Review: I am very interesting to find all the books written by Rachel Carlson in french. I looked for these books in several book shops in france. Unsuccessfully . Thank you for your help
Rating:
Summary: please help
Review: I'm french girl and i watch on TV a subject about Rachel Carson. I want to buy her book but i would find a french version. Can you help me?
| 
