<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Stimulating, honest and inspiring
Review: "Fresh air" is the best definition of Seki's book on art and brain. Innovative for neuroscientists and artists, it proposes a comprehensive, yet speculative (i.e., stimulating), vision on neuroaestethics. You won't read neither a neurosciences book, nor an art one. It's both... and more.
Rating:
Summary: Stimulating, honest and inspiring
Review: "Fresh air" is the best definition of Seki's book on art and brain. Innovative for neuroscientists and artists, it proposes a comprehensive, yet speculative (i.e., stimulating), vision on neuroaestethics. You won't read neither a neurosciences book, nor an art one. It's both... and more.
Rating:
Summary: Stimulating, honest and inspiring
Review: "Fresh air" is the best definition of Seki's book on art and brain. Innovative for neuroscientists and artists, it proposes a comprehensive, yet speculative (i.e., stimulating), vision on neuroaestethics. You won't read neither a neurosciences book, nor an art one. It's both... and more.
Rating: 
Summary: this has little to do with art
Review: as someone with a doctorate in psychology who has retired to a life of intensive painting, i can say this book falls short in its fundamental premise: if we can identify a distinct visual capability in the brain, that capability forms the basis for visual esthetic judgments. that argument unfortunately goes nowhere, and the result is a thin book with its substantive content spread even thinner.zeki's argument is roughly that the mind is an active creator of visual experience; that we create visual experience using a variety of "modular" cerebral functions (specific neighborhoods of the brain that detect edges, analyze movement, perceive color, recognize faces); and that art works which "appeal" to these modular capabilities provide the foundation for art. claims that art that becomes "great" if the mind is presented with ambiguous or multiple interpretations, provoking it to "actively create" varied interpretations from the work in view. in this way zeki hopes to reason his way toward a "neurological esthetics," a biologically based prescription of what is beautiful or compelling art. well, where to begin ... because a brain function is invoked by a stimulus does not make it interesting or great; my review invokes your language capabilities, but that doesn't make my words poetry. a painting does not succeed by creating a variety of specific but competing interpretations, as zeki claims, but by reframing awareness into a realm where the mundane categorizations necessary for behavior are stretched by the exercise of the senses. what counts as beautiful cannot be determined from the quantitative activity of different brain regions. what counts as beautiful depends heavily on cultural expectations, not on physiology ... on and on the objections roll. in the end, zeki's argument is highly parochial. his examples come from the "edge detection" art of the supremacists or the cubists; the "color perception" art of the fauves, the "movement perception" art of calder, and so on -- simplistic art for simplistic art theories. (someone should ask, where are the edges in monet or turner, the color in kline or velazquez, the movement in vermeer or van dyck?) on the philosophical side, zeki seems willing to cite plato or hegel as straw men to knock down, but seems completely unaware of the many philosophical or social psychological theorists who could enrich his "active construction" view of visual perception. finally, zeki seems not to have had a personal colloquy with practicing artists, who could disabuse him of his naive reading of western art and its traditions. psychologists will find this book to be unexpectedly thin on the facts of recent neural research and cognitive function, and lacking in philosophical depth. artists will look at zeki's simplistic reading of art and art history, shrug and wonder, what is this guy talking about?
Rating:
Summary: What studying brain cells can tell us about art
Review: I found this book extremely fascinating: Because it provides compelling evidence that certain aspects of our aesthetic experience when looking at paintings can be understood in terms of the physiological properties of neurons in the visual brain. It is written lucidly, with beautiful illustrations.
Rating:
Summary: What studying brain cells can tell us about art
Review: I was deeply fascinated by this book: because it provides compelling evidence that certain aspects of the way we perceive art can be explained by the physiological properties of nerve cells in the visual brain. Zeki illustrates this point most strikingly at examples of modern art. He proposes that many modern artists have unknowingly created visual stimuli that are optimally tailored to the response properties of neurons in specific subregions of the visual processing stream. Zeki's writing is extremely lucid, with a good portion of irony, and excellent illustrations increase the pleasure or reading this book.
<< 1 >>
|
