<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Hayashi Much Better
Review: Campared to Hayashi, Davidson and Mackinnon's book is too "prose-like" and this style in my opinion isn't pedagogically suited for a first serious look into econometrics beyond the undergrad level. A model's assumptions and relevant properties are scattered throughout a chapter, burried in paragraphs, which can be annoying or even comfusing when you need to reference back. Hayashi, on the other hand, presents models with clear listed assumptions, propositions, relevant derivations. DM's book is in my opinion extremely pedagogically inferior in this sense.However, there're still things you may take away from this book. For example, they present the classical regression model in the framework of matrix project, subspaces, etc., which is not usually treated this way in other texts. This approach makes many tedious matrix manipulation easier. In my opinion, if you are looking for your first metrics book beyond the undergrad level, definately go for Hayashi first. This is simply the BEST book in terms of learning. For some more depth and alternative pespective, then consider this one.
Rating:
Summary: Hayashi Much Better
Review: Campared to Hayashi, Davidson and Mackinnon's book is too "prose-like" and this style in my opinion isn't pedagogically suited for a first serious look into econometrics beyond the undergrad level. A model's assumptions and relevant properties are scattered throughout a chapter, burried in paragraphs, which can be annoying or even comfusing when you need to reference back. Hayashi, on the other hand, presents models with clear listed assumptions, propositions, relevant derivations. DM's book is in my opinion extremely pedagogically inferior in this sense. However, there're still things you may take away from this book. For example, they present the classical regression model in the framework of matrix project, subspaces, etc., which is not usually treated this way in other texts. This approach makes many tedious matrix manipulation easier. In my opinion, if you are looking for your first metrics book beyond the undergrad level, definately go for Hayashi first. This is simply the BEST book in terms of learning. For some more depth and alternative pespective, then consider this one.
Rating: 
Summary: Best buy
Review: Definitely the best and clearest book so far on this subject!! Written by a real top expert in this field (I took his course, the best eco. course I have taken). Much better than Green's book. If you are a serious graduate student in economics and management, especially those of you who are pursuing a PhD instead of only taking a course, it is the best for you. In-depth! Also frankly, it is not for a vaint brain and a guy with weak background. Only with this book and Johnston & Dinardo's, read and enjoy, then you will understand econometrics absolute confidently. Don't wast your money on other books!
Rating:
Summary: The best so far!
Review: Of several graduate econometric textbooks I've read so far, this is the best. Compared to Greene (2003), its explanations are much clearer and its mathematical results are adequately derived. Compared to Johnston & Dinardo (1997), its coverage is more complete. Compared to Hayashi (2000), its discussion of IV method is more explicit. To be fair, however, Hayashi is also extemely well-written.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent revision of a classic
Review: This new book is not a second edition of the classic 1993 book, but neither is it an 'all new' one. Now the book is clearer and it is easier to build a Graduate Course using this reference. There are not considerable new topics. I think this 2004 edition should be considered a mere 'lifting'. But it is worth the price. Work with this edition!
<< 1 >>
| 
