Rating: ![2 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-2-0.gif) Summary: An compilation of mostly outdated papers Review: This was a disappointing bought. I was looking for alive ideas and what I found out was a collection of outdated papers mainly on experience curve. Most of them are simply a homage to Bruce henderson, with almost no value today. Even the most recent papers are not specially insightfull. The two stars come from some usefull ideas picked up from somes papers as the redefinition of a what a company offers as a guide for improving your strategy or the pitfalls of the reductionist thinking. It is not enough for recommending this book.
Rating: ![2 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-2-0.gif) Summary: An compilation of mostly outdated papers Review: This was a disappointing bought. I was looking for alive ideas and what I found out was a collection of outdated papers mainly on experience curve. Most of them are simply a homage to Bruce henderson, with almost no value today. Even the most recent papers are not specially insightfull. The two stars come from some usefull ideas picked up from somes papers as the redefinition of a what a company offers as a guide for improving your strategy or the pitfalls of the reductionist thinking. It is not enough for recommending this book.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Good collection of concepts in Strategy Review: When I buy this book I expect to learn more about strategy, business and enterprises, and I must say I get it.There is a good description of some difficult concepts, and I fine approach to competetive entreprises rules. It is not the definitive book about it, but there is no definitive book for this. It is rigth that this is not a new book, and some of the articles are old ones (from 1960's and 70's) but If you are not an expert and you look for a complete review, you get your money back. And for last, I must confess that I like the content.
|