<< 1 >>
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: The _Best_ Polyhedra Book Review: I've read many books on polyhedra, and this is the best I have seen. It covers the history and mathematics of many different polyhedra; the Platonic and Archimedean solids are just the beginning. Kepler's rhombic polyhedra, stellated polyhedra, Miller's solid, etc. -- it's all here. The diagrams are exceptional. I teach high school geometry, and have found this book to be an essential resource in class. The level of detail is quite high, making the book useful as a straight-through read (for someone who is really into math) or a book to flip around in (for those who find heavy math intimidating, but still like polyhedra). Includes helpful tips for model-making. Buy it!
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: The _Best_ Polyhedra Book Review: I've read many books on polyhedra, and this is the best I have seen. It covers the history and mathematics of many different polyhedra; the Platonic and Archimedean solids are just the beginning. Kepler's rhombic polyhedra, stellated polyhedra, Miller's solid, etc. -- it's all here. The diagrams are exceptional. I teach high school geometry, and have found this book to be an essential resource in class. The level of detail is quite high, making the book useful as a straight-through read (for someone who is really into math) or a book to flip around in (for those who find heavy math intimidating, but still like polyhedra). Includes helpful tips for model-making. Buy it!
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: You should buy this! Review: It's a wonderful book for learning history of polyhedra, but I think it has too little 'mathematics' in. All in all, it's a masterpiece in my mathbook collection.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Comprehensive masterpiece! Review: This is the best book about polyhedra! But it's not always easy to read. He has chosen to take a chronological approach. That means that sometimes you have to look around a bit. I picked up the book wanting to understand two things. 1. What are the exact definition of the Platonic and Archimedian solids, i.e., how to destinguish the Platonic from the the Deltahedra and the 13 Archimedian from their isomeric forms and the pyramids. 3. What's the reason behind the names for the Kepler-Poinsot solids. Why is the great stellated dodecahedron called the great stellated dodecahedron? Cromwell answers the first question beautifully in Chapter 2. The second question is first discussed in Chapter 4, but I was still confused. It was only in Chapter 7 that it started to make sense. I believe the book will answer most of your questions, but you may have to look around for it.
<< 1 >>
|