Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
|
|
Anatomy in Diagnostic Imaging |
List Price: $63.95
Your Price: $63.95 |
|
|
|
Product Info |
Reviews |
<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: CT images appear grainy to today's CT images Review: Fleckenstein's Radiologic Anatomy is a fundamental, yet comprehensive text that every radiology resident must have. It explores in detail all of the major systems: gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, head and neck, thoracic, and even vascular. It may very well be the only radiologic anatomy book needed for residency training. Although Netter's Anatomy is a more than appropriate companion.
Rating: Summary: A must for radiology residents Review: Fleckenstein's Radiologic Anatomy is a fundamental, yet comprehensive text that every radiology resident must have. It explores in detail all of the major systems: gastrointestinal, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, head and neck, thoracic, and even vascular. It may very well be the only radiologic anatomy book needed for residency training. Although Netter's Anatomy is a more than appropriate companion.
Rating: Summary: Nice collection Review: of images from all modalities. In school we have been using Kelley's Sectional Anatomy for Imaging Professionals, which I have not been very happy with, so I purchased this book. I love the fact that on one side I can see the image without any labels, and on the other side a lot of the anatomy is labeled AND outlined. This is a great imaging anatomy book for any visual learner.
Rating: Summary: CT images appear grainy to today's CT images Review: ok book......not great. "grainy" CT images compared to 2003 multislice images.
<< 1 >>
|
|
|
|