Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: A book to electrical engineer's students Review: A total explanation about the data transmission. A really good book for engineer's students with a general exposure about de mathematic tools, as fourier, etc.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Great reference!! Review: I bought this book as a reference after taking a communication systems intro course using the Mischa Schwartz text. After seeing my lab partner use this book, I had to have it. Lathi's book was so much clearer and more understandable, and I could tell that it would be very helpful in the future. It's also useful for higher-level communication systems; currently I'm in a higher level comm class which uses the second half of the book as the text. I highly recommend this book, it's helped me a lot.-JB Zurn, EE master's candidate
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A commendable text and hats off to Prof. Lathi Review: I have used this book as the adopted text for a course in Communication Systems in Electronics and Communication Engineering major. I find this text a marvelous one in every aspect for introducing the subject, instigating interest in this exciting area. The treatment of math in the text is excellent, as the author takes all efforts to work us through the solved examples, with increasing mathametical maturity. The author goes further to explain the mathametical analysis mapping it to the real world behaviour. I had a chance to refer to other texts in this area too - Simon Haykin's Communication Systems, Carlson's text and others. While they are good, I think this one is the best one for any newcomer to the subject. It helped me in understanding advanced texts like Proakis's Digital Communications.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: The BEST intro to communication systems book around! Review: I have used this book as the text book for my first semester communication systems course at Cornell. I found this book is easy to read and understand, plus there are plenty of examples. Compared to other miserable communications textbooks out there, this book is a must-read for any telecom majors.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Nice!!!! Review: I read the Communication Systems Engineering book by Proakis and Salehi and comparing that with this book by Lathi, this book is a lot better. The concepts are explained much clearly and the book makes every attempt to relate the concepts with day to day life. Attention has been paid to detail so as not to confuse the student too much. Also the mathematics in this book is much more complete than the Proakis and Salehi book. I would recommend this book with 5 stars.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: great book Review: id just like to say its simplest and best book i've ever read on communications
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: The best introduction of Communications Systems Review: It is a very comprehesible, suitable to undergraduate students for their first book in Communications system. I really gain a lot of background knowledge from this book.
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: its a real disgusting experience for those who bearit!!! Review: sir, please try to explain things more clearly as your book suffused the students of punjab engineering college with a feeling towards education which is worst to think of.
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: O.K. as a reference Review: There are only two new chapters in this edition.All other chapters are the same as previous editions;even the problems are unchanged. A better reference is the book by A. Bruce Carlson.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A Student from UCDAVIS Review: This book is excellent for the beginners. People who think that the book is not good probably don't have enough elementary science background.
|