<< 1 >>
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A very good high-level survey of Randomized Algorithms Review: I have just completed a graduate course using this book. At times the book is a bit terse (not necessarily a negative!) and overall I can highly recommend it.Wolf Bein, UNLV
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: extremely informative but obscure Review: I've taken two CS classes that use this book and I always felt like this book was very informative. The algorithms and concepts that Motwani brings forth are extremely insightful and interesting. However, the presentation of the proofs has a lot of room for improvement. Notation is carried over from previous chapters and is sometimes unexplained, which makes it very difficult for someone who does not have a lot of familiarity with the material presented. The book presents very interesting topics and leaves a lot of open (unresolved) questions to the reader's curiosity and challenge.
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: More work should be done in proofs Review: Overall, the authors explain core concepts, the examples and the possible applications well. However, the readibility of their proof is far from that of the above three. Honestly some proofs should be re-written completely.
For example, in page 116, they try to use the induction method to prove Lova(')sz Local Lemma. After reading that page many times, I still didn't understand the structure of their proof.
I was TA for under-grad level algorithm course, got A+ in advanced Calculus II and A in intro. to PDE (both in under-grad level), really knew something about induction method and a little bit about algorithm. I am not smart, but far from stupid.
In the end, I google the internet and found a 3-page proof for the same thing. That's easy to catch in few minutes, and then, I understand the 1-page proof in the book. Is it ironic?
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: An enciclopedia for randomized algorithms. Review: The book has an exoustive amount of algorithms. Not everything is proved. Sometimes the proof contains to few steps to be understood. There are many algorithms explained well. After reading this book it is easy to create your own randomized algorithms.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A subtle introduction to probablistic algoritms Review: This book is a jewel. It demonstrates how clever and beautifully simple probabilistic ideas can lead to the design of very efficient algorithms. I like its very verbal intuitive style, with proof strategies being always transparently explained. For computer scientists, this is *the* reference work in randomized algorithms, by now a major paradigm of algorithms design. For classical probabilists, this could serve as an eye-opener on unsuspected applications of their field to important areas of computer science.
<< 1 >>
|