Rating: 
Summary: Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism
Review: .
.
The subtitle should really read "...Despotism, and DEMOCRATS"That's what Hannity REALLY means. He'll do or say anything to defeat democrats. I couldn't really get past the subtitle to read the book. Hannity has too many (un)hidden agendas to write a thoughtful book. He's like a broken record. Let's hear something new. And I believe Publisher's Weekly when they say the book is full of circular reasoning. I hear it every day on the radio, as I give Hannity my twenty minutes a day. Hannity is an intelligent, quick minded individual. I just wish he would be an individual thinker as well, instead of just jumping on the conservative, anti-democrat bandwagon. But if I could make his kind of money, I'd jump on that wagon too. Hannity, more power to 'ya. I dislike the silly, repetitive, close minded, circular things you say so much that I have to tune in every day to hear the latest ridiculousness. But listening to the radio is easy. Not gonna buy the book. Not gonna do it.
Rating: 
Summary: THE INNER WORKINGS OF THE LIBERAL MIND
Review: Look at the recent one star reviews. Are you feeling what I am feeling? Its undeniable! They are GLOATING, thats right, GLOATING- over NEGATIVE economic news! How sick is that!!! They are GLOATING over job losses and outsourcing(which of course have NOTHING to do with Bush economic policy- and will get much worse if Kerry is elected and raises taxes and institutes protectionist trade policy) and GLOATING over losses in the stock market. WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE??? Dont you know that the trust fund that daddy set up for you will be effected by all of this? Reading these reviews, I can only conclude one thing- liberals are the most bitter, cynical, small minded fools in existence who will do anything to get rid of Bush. Ask them what John F'in Kerry will do to stop outsourcing. Bet they dont have an answer! Know why? Because Kerry doesn't either! He has no ideas!!! He has no policies- economic or foreign! He's just a spewer of anti-Bush rhetoric with no basis in actual thinking or policy alternatives. A vote for Kerry is a VOTE FOR NOTHING. Shame upon you.
Rating: 
Summary: Fallacious Politics
Review: Either/or reasoning, a logical fallacy (for those of you interested in logic and rhetoric), has shaped American foreign and domestic policy for decades, especially during Republican administrations. President Dubya, like Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, and Ronald Reagan before him, has used this fallacious rhetorical strategy to his advantage. Patriotic Americans support their president, for good or ill. You're either for us or against us; you're either a terrorist or a freedom fighter. You're either a commie or a patriot: sound familiar? Our democracy (any democracy, for that matter) is founded upon informed public debate, which requires that people occasionally criticize the leadership. We are, after all, President Bush's bosses, aren't we? We elected him, and we get to determine if we'd like to rehire him in November. More and more, "liberals" have become a cog in the machinery of evil, and Hannity's short-sighted, narrow-minded babbling has furthered this idiotic perception. With the fall of the Soviet Union and the general demise of communism as a stable form of government, terrorists have replaced communists as the dreaded Phantom (see Robert Coover's The Public Burning). Apparently terrorists, despots, and liberals are synonymous. A despotic rule, correct me if I'm wrong, is characterized by the imprisonment, murder, or banishment of anyone with a dissenting opinion. You're either for us, or against us; and if you're against us you're a commie (1950's) or a terrorist (2000's). Thanks, Sean, for tightening Dubya's despotic grip. Unlike John Kerry, I won't run away from my liberal leanings. Food for thought: according to the Oxford English Dictionary, a liberal is one who is "free in bestowing; bountiful, generous, open-hearted." Dubya and Hannity, you'll be proud to know you're not liberals. Congratulations.
Rating:
Summary: Great Book a must read...
Review: This filthy animal is the newest incarnation of a right wing attack dog without the genitals he was born with or the brains one would expect from a normal adult. This book is perfect if you drink the cool aid the right wing is spoon feeding the American public. If you believe there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, this book is for you. If you believe the coward draft dodger bush won the election, this book is for you. If you think the wealthiest American should pay no taxes and the middle class should pay 50% of their earnings this book is for you. How long will it be before you dumb ass Jesus freaks wake up and realize your being butt raped by the right wing for both your money and your personal freedoms. I once thought Republicans stood for getting government off our backs, not into our bedrooms, radios, televisions, and wallets. If you buy this book you will have a 2 month supply of toilet paper.
Rating:
Summary: Are All Liberals Rabid Hate Spewers?
Review: I cannot believe the anger and the frustration in the non-reviews of these people. I read lunacy and hate. I think these people make some of Mr. Hannity's points perfectly. It seems some people do want to hate America FIRST, hate our President, and hate anyone who earns their way in this society. I'm glad to read in his book some insight to why these people think like they do. It appears Life-time handouts from the government, whether they are welfare chronics or just higher education junkies, make you looney and angry.
Rating: 
Summary: Giving Us Some Daily Bread
Review: To some elites the concept of Evil is archaic and even invoking the word is condemned as non-inclusive and judgmental. Sean Hannity comes from a different school of thought--one founded more firmly in reality where Good and Evil really exist and are locked in an eternal battle. In his second book, he analyzes a few episodes of pure evil over the past 100 years. Despite the book's provocative subtitle, he does not truly lump liberalism in with despotism and terrorism; rather he sees leftist appeasement as fertile ground for these evils to take root and an absence of righteousness as nurturing their growth. He is relentless in his excoriation of liberalism's failure to understand and even admit that evil exists. An entire chapter devoted to the Clintons (along with others exploring communism, nazism, and Iraq) is guaranteed to raise the hackles of modern day Democrats. And although he doesn't warrant his own chapter Former President Jimmy Carter insouciance, naiveté, and grandstanding make him a repeated target of Hannity's well-supported wrath. Ironically it is the chapters devoted to historical periods that standout. Hannity's admirers either see and/or hear him daily so they are used to completely up-to-date discussions of current events--obviously impossible in book form. His chapter devoted to the 2004's Democratic presidential candidates is already dated. However, he displayed some shrewd prescience in compiling it because John Kerry was virtually written off just two or three months prior to securing the nomination, but the senate's most liberal member is afforded a generous helping of assiduous and damaging scrutiny. While the book provides little in the way of fresh details, it successsfully links evil's grip on various totalitarian empires over the Twentieth Century. And even open-minded progressives will admit that his perspicuous dialectics provide much food for thought. In a poignant assertion regarding nazi Germany and how often the millions of lives lost become one big, impersonal statistic, Hannity remembers "the numbers hide millions of individual stories each of them as heartrending as the worst of today's headlines." He also points out a too often denied reality--Hitler hated Christianity as much as Judaism, proffering that "the leaders of the Third Reich saw that without God, the state and its leaders were free to shape morality." Discussing the Cold War, he examines how leftist illuminati provided untold moral support to Soviet powers. Much of Europe never quite accepted Ronald Reagan and Hannity points out how the 40th president's unflinching vision forced the continent's leaders to make a choice between "do we (Europeans) believe the nation that saved us from nazi totalitarianism...or do we put our faith in Soviet Communism?" Shockingly, many leftists in America as well as Europe selected communism's never-fulfilled promise of utopia. He credits the Soviet leadership for having enough smarts to fear not only President Reagan but also the promise of America; "if the Soviets had one thing in common with Reagan, it was that they both had more faith in America's ability than the American left did." The United Nations' credibility has long been in question. With Iraq's liberation further diminishing its standing, Hannity aptly summarizes that the international bureaucracy "has become a kind of organized forum for appeasement anxious to obstruct the actions of law-abiding nations while rewarding rogue nations for their illegal behavior." Regarding Iraq, he discusses one of the anti-warriors' most insipid and most repeated shibboleths: that the U.S. lead multinational liberation was a unilateral act. Despite the banality of that allegation, Hannity acknowledges "unilateralism is no crime, if it means acting in our own national interest regardless of the stance of other nations." He also talks about the hysteria over a failure to locate WMD in Iraq yet. Pondering the agreement of worldwide intelligence agencies that such weapons existed and the inconvenient fact that Saddam had indeed used them previously, Hannity sounds a reasonable alarm "the fact that no weapons (of mass destruction) have yet been found in Iraq, gives me greater cause for concern," because the chance that they were moved to another unfriendly and still functioning dictatorship cannot be dismissed. Most of the leftist support for evil regimes spotlighted is merely antics of useless idiots, but he especially condemns a concrete case of terrorist coddling. Noting "in his eight years in office Clinton played host to (Yassar) Arafat more often than anyone else (considered a 'world leader')," he realizes what a horrid message that conveyed. "Deliver Us from Evil" covers no new ground, but it does make a cogent connection between some of evil's manifestations over the past 100 years. While it is unable to maintain the timeliness of Sean Hannity's radio and TV programs, its format allows him to address pertinent issues more thoroughly than his fast-paced daily outlets ever permit. Since the author often rightly boasts of intellectual honesty, one mistake in the book must be noted. He references "Rudolph Hess, not long before he was hanged for his crimes." In truth the nazi thug died in 1987 after a lengthy prison sentence.
Rating:
Summary: Who is evil?
Review: According to Sean anybody who disagrees with President Bush's policies on defeating terrorism must be considered evil. President Bush has said that your either with us or your with the terrorists. This kind of thinking does not promote cooperation from other nations who's support is needed if we are to win the war on terror, since there are terrorist cells in so many countries around the world. But apparently if you disagree with Bush's policies on this matter you must be evil. You also must be evil if you feel that terrorism needs to be dealt with at it's root causes. Research has shown that terrorism manifests itself when people are oppressed and exploited. The United States supports Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries who oppress there citizens because it is in the best interests of the United States to do so. This country also supports the atrocities commited against the people of Palestine by the Israeli government. If you feel that the United States should change its policies regarding these matters to prevent terrorism from manifesting in the future you are evil. You are also evil if you call yourself a liberal and have an opinion that differs from Sean or other conservatives. If for example you believe that you are free to have your own ideas and to share those ideas with others in a rational way then you are evil. Actually, I believe that an evil person is one who seeks to divide others and one who's ego is so big that he will not even listen to another's ideas. Sean would certainly qualify. Those of you who are fans of Sean Hannity I ask you to pray for discrimination so that you can see where evil truly lies. I gave Sean a five star review because I wanted to thank him for writing this book. Sean and others like him are a constant reminder of what is the wrong approach to solving the problems of this great nation that I love so dearly. Sometimes it is necessary to become aware of the wrong way in order to find the right path for our country and the world.
Rating:
Summary: Well written, to the point.
Review: Hannity does it again with his newest book arrival. He clears the distortion and manipulation of the wicked Left of the country. Like him or not, this is a must read!
Rating:
Summary: Deliver Us From Evil
Review: Sean Hannity has emerged to the forefront of the conscience of main-stream America. He lacks the fear of exposing the Socialistic undercurrent that threatens to dominate the lives of a free society. If this threat is not met with resistance, we stand to be put in bondage of the very thing that Russia is discarding and China is realizing it hasn't worked for them either.
We need more Hannitys to sound the alarm and expose the Kennedy's, Clinton's and Kerry's extreme left wing agendas that threaten to drive our freedoms into the ground forever.
Rating:
Summary: Did any of you really read the book?
Review: The book rocked! I enjoyed it, there were funny parts and I even learned a few things. Mr. Hannity hit the nail on the head. The truth is a bitter pill the left can't swallow!
Thank You.
And you will notice I am not some lame liberal afraid to use my name! Also I can spell!
| 
