Rating: 
Summary: I Wonder...
Review: "The Bush Administration has designated $43 million to the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan, the most virulent anti-American violators of human rights in the world today. The gift, announced last Thursday by Secretary of State Colin Powell, in addition to other recent aid, makes the U.S. the main sponsor of the Taliban and rewards that "rogue regime" for declaring that opium growing is against the will of God. So, too, by the Taliban's estimation, are most human activities, but it's the ban on drugs that catches this administration's attention."I would expect small government conservatives should be astonished to learn that the Bush admin's focus on expanding their governmental war on drugs was so great they literally gave millions to the enemy of the state. Wonder if any of that $43 million wound up in Osama's hands? I wonder. How many chapters would Hannity have devoted if this action was done by the Clintons? Again, I wonder.
Rating: 
Summary: Still a conservative despite the $
Review: First and foremost I am a conservative who has seen the light after working a number of years in the liberal television media. While working in television I didn't see it. I didn't see the liberal workings because I was a part of it. After leaving to become a stay at home mom I see time after time how much my former counterparts spin everything. As a result I have returned to my original God given roots of conservativism. (My parents are so proud). I digress. To the last individual who stated only the rich are conservative...well let me educate you. I personally have NEVER made over $35,000. My husband is making in the mid $50's...well looky here someone who is a conservative who makes less than your liberal paycheck. Amazing to think that someone so poor could be a conservative.
Anyhow, I bought Sean's book this weekend and it again has stirred the fire in my belly. I absolutely love this book. Sean doesn't skirt around the issues with a song and dance of rhetoric. He shows CLEARLY and DISTINCTLY how the left left their minds in the gutter. Their minds are fogged with the rantings of lunatics. They have seen clear proof of the difference of good and evil in the world and are still either oblivious to it or truly choose to turn a blind eye in hopes for recovering the White House.
Sean you have truly outdone yourself. Keep up the great work! This is truly a work of love and dedication. From a poor conservative...
Rating:
Summary: A "Must Buy" Book
Review: The best political commentary book currently going. Get it on audio and take it with you in the car!
Rating:
Summary: Great Book! Hannity Nails It!
Review: This book is great. I'll be glad when the rest of the country opens their eyes and sees the truth. It's time to stop the whining, step up and support your country. Hannity says it like it is. That's just fact. He supports his views with facts. Nuff said. Great book...by the way.......I think it's #1!!!! Hopefully some of those "on the fence" will take the plunge, buy the book, and realize ........they need to stand by their country. Thanks all.
Rating:
Summary: Liberal is code for...
Review: Liberal is right wing code for: 1. minorities
2. gays
3. The Northeast and California
4. Jews
5. The Working Class
6. Scholars Obvious though this may be, thought I might point it out:
Translated, "Deliver Us from Evil Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, Minorities, Gays, Yankees, California Weirdos, Scholars, The Working Class, and Jews." Way to go, Sean! You're a "great American"! I hear some PO'd conservatives? Well, who comprises the liberal group? In your heart of heart you know this is true.
Rating:
Summary: What is the problem with Liberals?
Review: After read Sean's books I have only one question, what is wrong with Liberals? The complaints that I have read posted here make me wonder if any of them have even read this or his other book. Everything he says is true, he has extensive footnotes that can be verfied easily. And being unable to attack his ideas they instead attack the man, very petty. If we are to have a true debate, a serious debate, then lets debate on fact, not emotion.
This book is well written and well researched. I have no problem recommending this book to anyone. So long as they are willing to open their eyes to the truth and tha facts.
Rating:
Summary: Cry Me a River Liberals.....
Review: I have been listening to Sean Hannity's weekday talkshow for a little over a year now. His previous book was great as well as this one!!! I can tell that he worked so hard on this book! I don't understand how liberals (aka Democrats, progressives, etc... it is interesting how they can't call themselves liberals) could trash this book because Hannity writes about a particular topic and then tells where he got all of his facts from. Any review of this book that is negative just shows how much liberals see George W. Bush and Hannity as a threat to their own political greed. Liberals like to bash people a lot but never ever say what they would do instead. John Kerry was recently in Florida scaring senior citizens into believing that "evil Republicans" were going to take away their "guaranteed social security benefits." Well if they would do a little digging themselves, they would know that the republicans tried to pass a law stating that SS benefits would be guaranteed by law but guess who blocked it? The liberals. Shocking? Not to me. I see liberals lying every day. God help us if Kerry gets elected. Hannity does a great job in this book stating their lies (with proof). BUY THIS BOOK! YOU'LL LOVE IT!
Rating:
Summary: Libs can't handle the truth
Review: After reading all of the negative customer reviews of this book Amazon chooses to print I feel obligated to tell readers this is a very interesting, very well written book. Liberals can't handle the truth & will attack anyone who holds views that are different than their views.
Rating:
Summary: Bush Ignored Warnings About al-Qaeda
Review: Senior Clinton administration officials called to testify next week before the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks say they are prepared to detail how they repeatedly warned their Bush administration counterparts in late 2000 that Al Qaeda posed the worst security threat facing the nation - and how the new administration was slow to act. They said the warnings were delivered in urgent post-election intelligence briefings in December 2000 and January 2001 for Condoleezza Rice, who became Mr. Bush's national security adviser; Stephen Hadley, now Ms. Rice's deputy; and Philip D. Zelikow, a member of the Bush transition team, among others. One official scheduled to testify, Richard A. Clarke, who was President Bill Clinton's counterterrorism coordinator, said in an interview that the warning about the Qaeda threat could not have been made more bluntly to the incoming Bush officials in intelligence briefings that he led. "It was very explicit," Mr. Clarke said of the warning given to the Bush administration officials. "Rice was briefed, and Hadley was briefed, and Zelikow sat in." Mr. Clarke served as Mr. Bush's counterterrorism chief in the early months of the administration, but after Sept. 11 was given a more limited portfolio as the president's cyberterrorism adviser. Until 9/11, counterterrorism was a very secondary issue at the Bush White House," said a senior Clinton official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "Remember those first months? The White House was focused on tax cuts, not terrorism. We saw the budgets for counterterrorism programs being cut." The issue is addressed in a new book by Mr. Clarke, and in an interview to promote the book on "60 Minutes" on CBS-TV scheduled for Sunday, Mr. Clarke said that the White House considered bombing Iraq in the hours after the Sept. 11 attacks, even when it became clear that Al Qaeda was responsible. "I think they wanted to believe there was a connection, but the C.I.A. was sitting there, the F.B.I. was sitting there, saying, `We've looked at this issue for years - for years, we've looked, and there's just no connection,' " Mr. Clarke said. He recalled telling Defense Secretary Rumsfeld that "there are a lot of good targets in a lot of places, but Iraq had nothing to do with the Sept. 11 attacks." -> Keep ignoring the obvious, like the Bush administration did regarding terrorism. And keep buying into the strained and simplistic jargon of people like Hannity. Attack Kerry all you want, it doesn't matter if Bush runs against Kerry or Abe Vigoda. The central issue of this election is DAMAGE CONTROL for the country. Specifically, the inept ideologue - Bush, needs to go before he can further damage the economy, increase the deficit, employment, social security, the environment, the school system, the middle class and the working poor, and most importantly, NATIONAL SECURITY.
Rating:
Summary: RE:Good Job dubya - U.S. Sinking in the Eyes of the World!,
Review: Good Job, Sara Duncan. This administration is fueling anti-US sentiments through its unnecessary and irrelevant invasion of Iraq. It is viewed by the world for exactly what is, a neoconservative, imperialist action. It has provided terrorists with incentive, and at the same time weakened the incentive for nations across the world to work in conjunction with us to erradicate terrorist groups. This - along with a president whose policies will actually weaken our borders has made us significantly less secure. Iraq will prove to be a disaster. Unfortunately, Hannity - and this is why he is a dangerous propagandist, has and will spin any solution to terrorism that is not synonymous with neoconservative imperialism as an appeasement strategy, as he as done in DUFE. However, the neoconservative imperialistic strategy will fuel further terrorist activity and weaken our ability to erradicate such threats by further alienating the US. I look forward to reading Against All Enemies, by Richard Clarke due out March 22. Richard Clarke was the Bush counter terrorism czar who served under Bush I, Clinton, and one year of Bush II before resigning. Clarke will establish the pre-existing agenda of the Bush administration to invade Iraq, which echos O'Neill's allegations in The Price of Loyalty. Clarke will also provide evidence that this administration did anything and everything possible to tie Sept. 11 to Iraq and Iraq to al-Qaeda. He will also cite the numerous frantic warnings his agency provided to the administration regarding al Qaeda's intent to use hijacked planes as weapons - all ignored by this administration. Clarke considers Bush running under the national security banner "outrageous". Unless you're blinded by the right, you should too.
| 
