<< 1 >>
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Un libro basico en obstetricia Review: Este libro, escrito por conocedores de cada uno de los temas es una guia basica para la atencion de la paciente embarazada. Un libro que facilmente compila a varios.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: The Harrison's for OB Review: Like Harrison's is for internal medicine and Nelson's for peds, so is Gabbe for OB. Anything you want to know about pregnancies and managing deliveries is in this book. It's a bit large to just sit down and read, but it makes a great reference book.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: The easier-to-read "Bible" of Obstetrics Review: There are two texts that are considered the most authoritative on the subject of Obstetrics. Williams is edited by the staff at Parkland, the largest Obstetric hospital in the U.S. and not surprisingly, they consider their text to be "the premier source for the specialty". Williams is also academically dry.Gabbe, by comparison, is easier to read and covers essentially the same material. This text is written in a way that that I feel you don't have to be an OB Geek to follow the various points. This is NOT to say that Gabbe is "OB for Dummies" or a cliff-notes version of an OB text: As Department Head of OB/GYN at a Major Hospital, I find Gabbe both authoritative and complete. Cutting to the chase: Gabbe is easier to read than Williams, and if you need info more in-depth, you should already be a fellow of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology anyway (or at least a junior fellow), which means that you're accessing the ACOG website on-line anyway.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: The easier-to-read "Bible" of Obstetrics Review: There are two texts that are considered the most authoritative on the subject of Obstetrics. Williams is edited by the staff at Parkland, the largest Obstetric hospital in the U.S. and not surprisingly, they consider their text to be "the premier source for the specialty". Williams is also academically dry. Gabbe, by comparison, is easier to read and covers essentially the same material. This text is written in a way that that I feel you don't have to be an OB Geek to follow the various points. This is NOT to say that Gabbe is "OB for Dummies" or a cliff-notes version of an OB text: As Department Head of OB/GYN at a Major Hospital, I find Gabbe both authoritative and complete. Cutting to the chase: Gabbe is easier to read than Williams, and if you need info more in-depth, you should already be a fellow of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology anyway (or at least a junior fellow), which means that you're accessing the ACOG website on-line anyway.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Very readable general reference on gynaecology Review: With contributions from authorities in different aspects of obstetrics and gynaecology, this book provides the reader with excellent overview, ranging from the anatomy of the pelvis (in this edition moved to an appendix), to legal an moral aspects of the profession. Each of the chapters are relatively easy to read, but the coverage tends to vary in depth. It is clearly not the intention of the authors to provide the reader with last word on each topic, but ample references show the way further. Statistical data, when provided, are up to date and consistent with the quoted references. I particularly liked the chapters on labor and delivery, malpresentations and caesarians. A lot of chapters are dedicated to pregnancies complicated by (maternal) pathologies and there is even a chapter on neonatal care. Some of the authors tend to "overdo it a bit" when fulminating against unneccessary caesarians, but considering the incidence data in America compaired to the rest of the developed world, they do have a point. I can recommend this book to anyone looking for an excellent starter in obstetrics, but I tend to disagree with another reviewer calling it "the Nelson (in pediatrics) for OB", because it has much less the intention to be comprehensive.
<< 1 >>
|