Anatomy of the Titanic

Rating:
Summary: Worth having if you're interested in Titanic and her sisters
Review: Definitely good value for the money, although the author makes some unaccountable errors; there are at least 2 photos of Britannic captioned as being Titanic and a couple shots of wooden patterns for Olympic's turbine engine captioned as being the engine itself; these are so obvious I'm suprised McCluskie missed them. As other reviewers here have pointed out a lot of the shots are of Olympic; in many of the photos an easy way to tell which shots are of what is to look for hull numbers stenciled on the parts. Anything numbered 400 is from Olympic, 401 is Titanic, and 433 is Britannic. Not a perfect book, but a useful addition to anyone's Titanic collection.

Rating:
Summary: It's Good For One Thing...
Review: This book is good for one thing only and that is its pictures of the Olympic and Titanic's staterooms. This rest is a muddle of information on the 3 sister ships that can't define the difference between the three.VERY BAD EDITING.

Rating:
Summary: GREAT!
Review: This is an very good book on the building of the TITANIC. It had a few stumblings by showing pictures of the RMS Olympic and the HMHS Britannic(my favorite). Their weren't many pictures taken at the era so we can't blame Mr. McCluskie

Rating:
Summary: GREAT!
Review: This is the best book if you want images of staterooms. There is also a part with some of the original drawings of light fig. and rooms.