A Race Against Time: Racial Heresies for the 21st Century

Rating:
Summary: One of the most enlightening books I have ever read
Review: I cannot say enough about how good this book is. THIS is why printing presses were invented. A real revolution is shaping up in these pages--one like the Copernican revolution, but MUCH more important on a grand scale to our future on this planet.

This book destroys prejudice in the true sense of the word--by relentlessly pursuing facts and truth beyond the emotional conditioning we have grown up with in our modern Jew-influenced and twisted culture. This book talks clearly about the vast differences between the races. On page 208, the book elucidates how Blacks are much more present-oriented than whites, and shows how they are less motivated by knowledge-seeking, even with the same SAT scores. We get the idea clearly by the end of this book that the world looks very different to other races and that they will also therefore create one that is very different from ours as their power and numbers grow.

This is the extinction of the white race we are facing--clearly and unequivocally. The writers had the courage of Bruno the philosopher who was burned at the stake during the dark ages for his views on Heliocentrism. The people who condemned him refused to look through telescopes. They were PREJUDICED to the extreme. HERE is a telecope of vastly greater importance to our future. Justice demands that we all look through this telescope.

RACE is a real issue--probably the most important issue that ever existed in the intellectual world. You cannot think clearly without facts, and this book presents them clearly to show the problems we are up against. Many modern issues are dealt with--from the failures of school integration to the 70-80% inheritance of IQ. Blacks have 20 points lower IQ's than whites. Additionally, they show how the numbers are distorted by our interpretations of them and that inheritance is actually even greater than that astounding (by PC standards) number. Additionally, they factor in the mind-expanding ideas that the environment itself is built by people in the modern world--which means that high IQ people create a stimulating and enriching environment. You need to inherit AND live among those motivated by knowledge.

In other areas, they show how police are not biased at all in their arrest patterns--when we factor in the wildly different rates of criminal activity between the various races. We find that there are many myths and urban legends which we have been conditioned to believe emotionally, but are simply not true. Not true at all in fact. When we believe something, we tend to think there is a kernel of truth somewhere. In this case, astoundingly, there is not. All you have to do is to logically and objectively gather the facts and let them speak for themselves. This book is the destruction of prejudice.

The only weak point is the books reluctance to deal with the Jewish-influence behind the scenes in creating our misperceptions about race and heredity. This is a central issue, because they have a very different world view also, in spite of their intellect. Their intellect makes them especially dangerous to the future of truth. For example, the Jew Franz Boas created a whole new area of study to replace physical anthropology called cultural anthropology--crippling the study of racial and biological influences in culture. There are many such systematic examples of their fundamental differences from white Europeans. There is a reason they were kicked out of every country of Europe at one time or another--they were once banished from England for 400 years.

This may not be so bad. The Jewish issue may simply have been too big to possibly include here. There are many good books out there on the Jewish worldview and patterns of influence in culture--Kevin MacDonald, a professor at Californis State University has written several excellent books on the topic. That is the major failing of this book. This should have at least been mentioned or explained. Jews attempt to get on top of any intellectual movement to control and direct it away from scrutiny on them--in this book, a jew writes about the intellectual superiority of the Jews and how they therefore should naturally control things, along with parroting the growing white view of the differences between blacks and whites (for example). It is never mentioned that the Jews have patterns incompatible with western ideals as well--in fundamental ways which will eventually destroy us and all we hold most dear if we continue on our present path. That is a pretty big omission. They were historically the primary influence and funding behind our current prejudices and deceptions about all-important racial issues for example. Why doesn't this book talk about these fundamental issues? This is certainly the best book I have read on these issues other than that.I recommend it deeply with this one reservation.

Rating:
Summary: What this book is, What this book is not.
Review: One reviewer claims its filled with 'hate' and 'antisemitism' odd, since one of the writers, Michael Levin, is jewish. The reviewer obviously didn't not read the book because he makes wild assertions that it contains passages about 'jews controlling the world' - it does nothing of the kind. Please disregard unsubtaniated claims like this - they are meant to scare you away from the real issues.

There is not an ounce of 'hate' in this book, and intelligent people have come to realize that the people screaming "hate" and "racism" have no other recourse to the arguements presented in this book.

The book is a collection of essays from "American Rennaissance" magazine - covering race relations from a scientific, historical, philosophical and current perspective (which is roughly how the book is divided).

The two most important things I walked away with from reading this book are the following::

a. much as liberals detest creationists, when it comes to idealogy trumping science - the liberal left are far more guilty. Ignoring the overwhemling scientific data about the differance between races (much of it covered in the book).

b. "diversity" and "multiculturalism" are ONE WAY streets - for whites - every ethnic activist group that demand that Whites be color blind and open their borders, demand ethnic solidarity amongst their own.
Thus a mexican activist group has no problem demanding both open borders for the US and supporting the militarization and protection of mexico's border from gutamula.

Think about it - if it's prejudiced for whites to ask the country be more white, why is it 'ok' for say, hispanics to demand that their be more hispanics?

Whether you are liberal or conservative, this book will challenge a lot of your assumptions, especially scientific ones - and make you realize that other than inertia and dogma, current views about the races (that there are no basic differences) are as scientific as the flat earth theory.

What comes to mind when i read shrill reactions to this book and other evidence is quote, attributed to Galelio:

" "My dear Kepler, what would you say of the learned here, who, replete with the pertinacity of the asp, have steadfastly refused to cast a glance through the telescope? What shall we make of this? Shall we laugh, or shall we cry?"
--Letter from Galileo Galilei to Johannes Kepler "

Remember, anytime people are name calling chances are they don't have a reasonable rebuttle.



Rating:
Summary: Brave New World
Review: This book dares to say what most of us only whisper behind closed doors.

Rating:
Summary: Good thesis, false content
Review: This books central thesis is correct, namely that different cultures and different civilizations are made up of different races, frequently imbuing those races with different characteristics. But the content in developing this thesis makes this book a pure hate book. The argument goes on to try to `prove' that the `white' race is superior because European civilization is superior and tries to show `scientifically' how other races are dumber. But then the text takes an even more bizarre turn into anti-Semitism, claiming that the Jews who the book claims have higher IQs are controlling the world. Typical anti-Semitic tripe. But the argument is illogical. If the book believes that intelligence is the determining factor in greatness, then how can Jews be then discarded as `inferior'. The book, of course, ignores history by claiming that Europeans are superior. What about Europe in 800 B.C when the Gauls were eating their own children and Rome and Greece were barbarian republics? IN 800 B.C civilization was in Africa and China and the Middle East. Obviously this puts the arguments on their heads. Truly a sad hateful work, although it had potential in its claims that civilization and race do have certain commonalities. Obviously race isn't merely `constructed' as other argue, but Race has little to nothing to do with the success of civilizations in the long term.

Seth J. Frantzman

Rating:
Summary: Good thesis, false content
Review: This books central thesis is correct, namely that different cultures and different civilizations are made up of different races, frequently imbuing those races with different characteristics. But the content in developing this thesis makes this book a pure hate book. The argument goes on to try to 'prove' that the 'white' race is superior because European civilization is superior and tries to show 'scientifically' how other races are dumber. But then the text takes an even more bizarre turn into anti-Semitism, claiming that the Jews who the book claims have higher IQs are controlling the world. Typical anti-Semitic tripe. But the argument is illogical. If the book believes that intelligence is the determining factor in greatness, then how can Jews be then discarded as 'inferior'. The book, of course, ignores history by claiming that Europeans are superior. What about Europe in 800 B.C when the Gauls were eating their own children and Rome and Greece were barbarian republics? IN 800 B.C civilization was in Africa and China and the Middle East. Obviously this puts the arguments on their heads. Truly a sad hateful work, although it had potential in its claims that civilization and race do have certain commonalities. Obviously race isn't merely 'constructed' as other argue, but Race has little to nothing to do with the success of civilizations in the long term.

Seth J. Frantzman