Censored 2005 : The Top 25 Censored Stories (Censored)

Rating:
Summary: Some of the most important news stories ever
Review: Despite living in a country founded on the ideals of "free speech", people are silenced when their opinion/commentary/etc. goes against the current status quo of the people in power. I will admit that I'm biased in my political views, but this book didn't play to that at all, instead talking about things that affect everybody.

Question: Why do the elite find it so necessary to silence the truth?

Reading this book is a must if you are interested in politics. 'Censored' contains extremely important social/political/economic news stories, that oddly enough, haven't found their way to the front page. The stories also offer insight into the way our country really operates.

Rating:
Summary: 25 Under or Non Reported But Important Stories
Review: Each year Project Censored at Sonoma State University selects 25 stories that have been under-reported or not reported at all by the national media. This year the stories range from Federal Government miss-deeds, inactions, and sneeky laws to actions by the media, large corporations and more. The stories are what you are not going to find on the evening news or on newspaper headlines, some samples: Widow Brings RICO Case Against U.S. Government for 9/11; The Media Can Legally Lie; U.S. Develops Letal New Bioweapon Viruses; Law Enforcement Agencies Spy on Innocent Citizens; Reinstating the Draft and so on.They are fascinating stories that while true just don't make it.

I find myself wondering why these kinds of stories don't make it. There is a suspicion on the parts of the editors that there is a conspiracy to prevent these news items from being shown. On the other hand, they are dull compared with the latest splatters of blood on the ground from an explosing in Iraq, Israel, or where ever. There's an old saying, if it bleeds it leads. Certainly as Peter Philips says in the Preface, the news is being Dumbed Down. The race for ratings points has taken over from the idea of supplying the news that's needed to make a democracy work. The news is certainly covering the politicians as this is a Presidential election year. But the politicians are just attacking each other, not saying at all what they would do themselves that's different, or saying that they have a plan which they then don't discuss.

After the 25 big stories, there are 14 chapters on updating stories from the previous years, or on stores requiring more in depth treatment.

You don't learn what's happening until the books come out, and this is one of the key book.

Rating:
Summary: More Proof of Media Monopoly
Review: I have followed the annual Project Censored guides for the better part of a decade, and can even credit the series with partially inspiring my recent master's degree in media studies. In that field, the overwhelming concern for the past several years has been the growing corporate consolidation of the media. Consequently, media outlets have a structural focus on news stories that reinforce the worldview of the corporate elite, and maintain the political and economic status quo, while simply ignoring stories that shed a bad light on such power structures. To a greater extent than ever, the "censored" stories located by the team this year predominantly feature corporate malfeasance and the consolidation of power by political and corporate elites, with unheralded harm being done to real people, along with a trampling of the common good and the public rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Alas, since this is a group project, once again the Project Censored team has included their great findings in a disappointingly inconsistent book. Not to mention the frequent typos and other signs of poor technical editing, this book is often sunk by self-righteousness from the very same journalists who have courageously brought the under-reported stories to light. These original reporters, writing their own follow-ups and investigative reports here, usually complain about how the mainstream press and general public continue to ignore their work - complaints that are tiresome and unnecessary, because since we're reading this book we're already completely aware of the problem. One low point is "Lifestyles of the Rich and Oligopolistic" in which Stephanie Dyer ruins an expose on the boards of directors of media giants by complaining about how individual directors don't share her personal politics. Even worse is "U.S. Coverage of Israel and Palestine: Choosing Sides" in which extraordinarily holier-than-thou freelance reporter Alison Weir unloads blanket criticism of all media (including, strangely enough, Project Censored) for under-reporting the namesake conflict, but offers little real structural analysis of why such under-reporting happens or how the situation could be improved.

Fortunately, the remaining media analysis in this year's edition is generally strong and enlightening, although coverage of the media monopoly process is a bit repetitive and merely distills information that has already been well covered by experts in the field (especially my personal favorite, Robert McChesney). As usual, the stories uncovered by the Project Censored team are extremely important for those who want to know more about not only the behavior of the mainstream media, but the state of the world for the 99.9% of us who are not members of the elite. But you will have to put up with a certain amount of self-righteousness and poor writing and editing as the team can't quite create a book as strong as the stories it uncovers. [~doomsdayer520~]

Rating:
Summary: Perhaps more than you want to know...
Review: I've been reading the annual Censored books for a few years now and I love them. But I have a mixed feeling about them. I want to know the information they contain but it sometimes depresses me. Is that a recommendation? Yes! Because unless you read diligently in the "alternative" magazines, I bet you haven't heard of 80% of these 25 stories. And most of them are very important stories. The effects of the US using depleted uranium in munitions is my current horror. It is a very scary story. Just because we haven't seen a mushroom cloud doesn't mean we're not reaping fallout. The people affected are not only in the lands where we use these weapons but also the vast majority of the soldiers we send to those countries, their spouses and children.

I also love much of the ancillary material, particularly the listing which companies belong to the five largest media groups in the world. Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation owns Fox TV but did you know that it also owns TV Guide and all HarperCollins book imprints? TimeWarner owns a huge number of media outlets including all the Turner stations (CNN, TBS, TNT, etc), more music labels than I knew existed (Atlantic, Elektra/Sire, Rhino, etc.), and several non-TimeLife publishers (Little Brown, Sunset Books, Leisure Arts, etc.)

I'm always interested to read follow-ups of past stories, updating the status of legal cases and other information. I give this five stars because I think the stories in here are all vitally important, easily readable and easy to digest.

Rating:
Summary: 25 stories that didn't deserve to be printed
Review: Pure garbage. The reason these stories were not distributed to the major press is that they are not worth the paper they were printed on.
Gosh! You mean that Dick Cheney actually had maps of the Iraq oil fields and refineries prior to our battle to liberate the the people of Iraq. Maybe, just maybe, this was so that we could preserve the economy for the Iraqi people and not an administration plot to steal the oil! Get real!
Conservatives own the voting machines- so this proves that Bush cheated in the 2004 elections?Conservatives develop corporations and technology that works. Capitalism works. Perhaps if the liberals and their press were not whining so much, they could direct their efforts towards something that would actually contribute some substance to the world.Instesd, theyare sitting on their butts in the ivory tower at Sonoma State University and casting judgement on what is and what is and what is not important in the world.
Unless you are seriously interested in stories based on theory with references to editorial comments from the liberal University based "elite" save your money.