Home :: Books :: Nonfiction  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction

Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Analyzing Interaction : Sequential Analysis with SDIS and GSEQ

Analyzing Interaction : Sequential Analysis with SDIS and GSEQ

List Price: $37.99
Your Price: $30.93
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: The Program is Great! Wish the Text was Simpler
Review: The program SDIS & GSEQ is one of a kind! I have been working with the program using my observational data since it first came out in 1995. Since then, the authors have done a exceptional job updating the program to make it more "user friendly".

Unfortunately, I did not find the text to accompany the program as "user friendly". The authors promote the book as a supplement to Bakeman and Gottman's "Observing Interactions: An Intro to Sequential Analyses", however the jump from the first book to the second is rather large. If only there were a book between the two, then the transition would have been easier.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: The Program is Great! Wish the Text was Simpler
Review: The program SDIS & GSEQ is one of a kind! I have been working with the program using my observational data since it first came out in 1995. Since then, the authors have done a exceptional job updating the program to make it more "user friendly".

Unfortunately, I did not find the text to accompany the program as "user friendly". The authors promote the book as a supplement to Bakeman and Gottman's "Observing Interactions: An Intro to Sequential Analyses", however the jump from the first book to the second is rather large. If only there were a book between the two, then the transition would have been easier.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates