Rating: 
Summary: opinion as fact
Review: Here we see Annorexic Coulter doing what she does best - presenting her own extremely biased right wing OPINION as fact. She is known for this, as well as her need to gain as much publicity as possible, hoping to milk the well suckled Rush Limbaugh farm cash-cow, and appeal to the reichbots of America, who remain dedicated sheeple in their championing of any writer or pundit who echoes their rigidly conservative and anti-liberal viewpoint. Hey congratulations to her - she will get lots of money and a certain amount of waspy fame, but here is one girl who must sleep poorly at night knowing the amount of negativity she pours into her culture.
Rating:
Summary: Coulter needs to read before she writes
Review: Coulter defends her bleak position with the typical monotiny that we here from fundamentalists on a daily basis. Her point is to stir up tensions between the left and the right- how much hate do we need? Don't read this book. Read something intelligently written based on facts. Instead of pitting the two sides against each other (they've both made mistakes) lets try to figure out a way to make this country a place where everyone has food, a roof over their head, education and health care. Ann Coulter, please read a book before you write one.
Rating: 
Summary: A surprising powerful theory of liberal behavior
Review: I don't think many liberals are intentionally treasonous, but Ann Coulter's thoroughly researched history of Cold War era McCarthy-bashing and more recent war on terror hand-wringing is very persuasive indeed. You can reliably predict what the left wing of the Democratic Party will do by asking "What policy is least in the interest of the United States and freedom-loving people everywhere?" (The corollary on the domestic front would be: "What policy is least in the interest of taxpaying families headed by heterosexual couples?") Keep up the great work, Ann!!
Rating:
Summary: Ann is Right on
Review: Ann is Right on and it's good to see her put it in hard cover. This came out just in time for relief from Hitlery's book! Whew!
Rating:
Summary: Liberals Are Libelous Traitors
Review: Inasmuch as some of the reviewers have admittedly not read the book and base their arguments on such lofty criteria as Coulter's fashion preferences and hair color, perhaps some of you would like to hear a cogent (and grammatically correct) review from someone who has actually read the book. It is masterful. As full of felicity and facetiae as Slander, it lucidly reveals the consistent treachery and perfidy of liberals beginning during the days of FDR. I would recommend this book especially to those young people in liberal indoctrination camps (a.k.a. public schools) who are tired (or more likely unaware) of the liberal revisionist history being spewed from the mouths of worthless academia. The only way the Republic will survive the threat of liberalism is if people start taking the responsibility to inform themselves and hold liberals accountable for their treasonous ideas, challenging their demonstrably false assertions at every opportunity. Liberalism will shrivel and die in the unbearable light of truth!
As for the convincing reviewers who accuse Coulter's readers of being stupid, I can assure you that my IQ is well over twice "room temperature." (It is 161 for those of you who actually care about the truth.) Take the initiative to educate yourselves!
I remain,
Mark Thornton
Rating:
Summary: a laugh a minute!
Review: I had to read this one with a book club. Oh man, what a tiresome trudge. I got sick of checking her "facts" by page three, but continued to press on. I hope someday to read an analysis of her "facts" in the newspaper. Simply put, this book is so chock full of misrepresentations and ambiguous interpretations one should consider calling Ms. Coulter a postmodern writer: the text is self-aware, it participates in conspiracy theories a-la Thomas Pynchon or Don Delillo, and it attempts to revise history. In other words, I would greatly advise readers to read this as a work of fiction, because the facts simply do not hold up to rational, disinterested scrutiny. Sadly, it appears that many will not be as observant of her liberal interpretations of "fact" and will read this as a non-fiction piece of historical analysis. The book should come with a "literalist warning" label, advising readers to read the tome as a postmodern conspiracy theory of history.
Rating:
Summary: What a load of hogwash!
Review: Typical BIG LIES by Coulter. Repeat a lie long enough, and loud enough, and it just might be accepted as true by the masses. In a book where she lambastes revisionist history, she does more of it than any other writer. She actually tries to justify and rationalize McCarthy! And with whom is questioning the loyalty of the left off-limits? I haven't seen any derision heaped on those that claim the Democrats are disloyal, except maybe by the target of such slander. Democrats and war protesters and anyone that challenges Duh-Bya and his Corporate pals are instantly labeled disloyal by the media, the right, and even some on the supposed left. Yet, if you try and challenge the motives behind Duh-Bya's decisions and policies, you're unAmerican and disloyal. I've seen it happen, and been subject to it. I don't know how she can keep a straight face during interviews. Either she really is a great actress, or she truly is a psychopathic lunatic that actually believes this garbage. I took a nice hot shower after I read it. I'd recommend the same for anyone else.
Rating:
Summary: A fun read for robo-conservatives with mid level IQs.
Review: Coulter is fun for Republicans with IQs in the 100-120 range. She has full command of the high school debate star rhetoric, but her books cry out for genuinely learned, intelligent debunking. Ann loves to defend her work on entertainment television -- the tv news programs beloved by mid-level hobbyist thinkers -- but she could never hold her own with authentic historians, with a full command of the material she hysterically misshapes to "make" her "points." I do recommend pairing her work with the work of an even more middlebrow, even more shameless "thinker," Peggy Noonan. Talk about fun blondish fascism!
Rating:
Summary: Malarkey
Review: A paranoid, reactionary, right-wing diatribe; perhaps, unworthy of serious intellectual consideration. This book is an attempt at political revisionism and at historical revisionism. The author must have a major ultraconservative agenda to pursue. ...
Rating:
Summary: Modern day Joan of Arc
Review: Thank God for Ann. She is a modern day Joan of Arc in writing about the truth!
| 
