Home :: Books :: Mystery & Thrillers  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers

Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Body Politic

Body Politic

List Price: $22.95
Your Price:
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: A truly unique well paced debut novel
Review: I have read this novel over a year ago after it won the Creasey award which is the British equivalent of the Edgar Award for best first novel. I found it to be refreshingly differnt and well thought out. Edinburgh in 2020 is actually based on Plato's Republic and starkly shows us the problem with this system. It is, in a sense, a science fiction novel on the order of Bladerunner in that the reader enters a truly different world. The book is well paced full of fascinating characters. I give a high grade, as well, to the novel's unique and original premise. Its well worth your time. Larry Gandle

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Edinburgh's Future? No thanks.
Review: It's Scotland, but not as we know it. In the year 2021 the UK has broken up, and Edinburgh is now a city-state run on the lines of Plato's Republic, with a good measure of corruption thrown in. Unfortunately, that's about as interesting as this book ever gets. The plot is very standard 'grizzly murder' fare and the tone is so cynical that I found it impossible to care about any of the characters, especially the protagonist, Quintillian Dalrymple. I suspect Paul Johnson's reputation has benefitted from the current high level of interest in Edinburgh crime writing. However, for better characters and plots try Ian Rankin; for better writing, try Iain Banks and for grizzlier murders try Christopher Brookmyre. Maybe Johnson's writing will improve. I hope so. In the meantime, I'd certainly recommend this book to someone who is intrigued by a crime novel set in the Edinburgh of the imaginary future. Sound like you?

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Edinburgh's Future? No thanks.
Review: It's Scotland, but not as we know it. In the year 2021 the UK has broken up, and Edinburgh is now a city-state run on the lines of Plato's Republic, with a good measure of corruption thrown in. Unfortunately, that's about as interesting as this book ever gets. The plot is very standard 'grizzly murder' fare and the tone is so cynical that I found it impossible to care about any of the characters, especially the protagonist, Quintillian Dalrymple. I suspect Paul Johnson's reputation has benefitted from the current high level of interest in Edinburgh crime writing. However, for better characters and plots try Ian Rankin; for better writing, try Iain Banks and for grizzlier murders try Christopher Brookmyre. Maybe Johnson's writing will improve. I hope so. In the meantime, I'd certainly recommend this book to someone who is intrigued by a crime novel set in the Edinburgh of the imaginary future. Sound like you?

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: Avoid with passion
Review: Rarely do i start a book and have to abandon it after 200 pages..It happened with this one.
Set up in a clean-cut Edinbourgh of the future this novel is basically a patched up work with bits and pieces and ideas rooted mostly in Orwellian domains (allthough it's a sacrilege to mention Orwell in the same context with this book).
The story is your basic crime story which comes at you the way a storm of cliches would. A serial killer, the witty "cool"-and-against-the-system detective who gets dragged out of retirement to catch the beast that terrorises the city, the murders that keep happening until Sherlock gets the right clues, and you yawning your way through this horror of a book.
Actually the only thing intimidating about this novel is exactly that: how horrible it is. The writting is at best uninspired and lacks any positive contribution to the genre, but worst of all the characters are such that if they existed in real life you would do your best humanly possible not to meet them unless you think that boredom is a virtue.
I read somewhere that this book even won an award in the UK! They must be kidding us!
I found myself totally not caring about the plot of the story already 50 pages in the book and the only reason i kept reading (until i finally gave up a full 150 pages before the end) was that i thought: a. there's an incredible twist coming up here that will save this joke of a story and b. i wanted to see how bad the book can actually get.
But i didnt even get the vicious satisfaction a masochist would seek by reading the worst possible book he could lay his hands on. Because, you see, if it was THAT bad i might've at least finished it. But it's not. It's flat, so flat, that it sets a standard. If this ever gets to be made into a movie some hollywood exec will lose his job.

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: Avoid with passion
Review: Rarely do i start a book and have to abandon it after 200 pages..It happened with this one.
Set up in a clean-cut Edinbourgh of the future this novel is basically a patched up work with bits and pieces and ideas rooted mostly in Orwellian domains (allthough it's a sacrilege to mention Orwell in the same context with this book).
The story is your basic crime story which comes at you the way a storm of cliches would. A serial killer, the witty "cool"-and-against-the-system detective who gets dragged out of retirement to catch the beast that terrorises the city, the murders that keep happening until Sherlock gets the right clues, and you yawning your way through this horror of a book.
Actually the only thing intimidating about this novel is exactly that: how horrible it is. The writting is at best uninspired and lacks any positive contribution to the genre, but worst of all the characters are such that if they existed in real life you would do your best humanly possible not to meet them unless you think that boredom is a virtue.
I read somewhere that this book even won an award in the UK! They must be kidding us!
I found myself totally not caring about the plot of the story already 50 pages in the book and the only reason i kept reading (until i finally gave up a full 150 pages before the end) was that i thought: a. there's an incredible twist coming up here that will save this joke of a story and b. i wanted to see how bad the book can actually get.
But i didnt even get the vicious satisfaction a masochist would seek by reading the worst possible book he could lay his hands on. Because, you see, if it was THAT bad i might've at least finished it. But it's not. It's flat, so flat, that it sets a standard. If this ever gets to be made into a movie some hollywood exec will lose his job.

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Intriguing Setting Doesn't Hold Up Flat Story
Review: The debut in Johnston's series set in Edinburgh circa 2020 suffers from having a more interesting setting than plot-which is a rather banal serial-killer number. In this world, the UK has dissolved and Edinburgh exists as a kind of repressive city-state run according to Plato's Republic. The "Enlightenment" led to the elimination of crime, along with individuality, resulting in a combination Stalinist/Puritan society rife with rules, regulations, fines and work camps. The city's primary economic driver is tourism, which the city achieves by combining the gambling of Las Vegas with the sex trade of Amsterdam. Unfortunately, while Johnston does a good job showing how corruption undermines this dystopian society, he never develops the city and its people enough to fully convince. The lives and status of "guardians" (police) are well-depicted, but we never see much of the average citizen and how the rest of the city functions (perhaps this developed later in the series).

The book's nominal hero, Quint, is a standard issue haunted former policeman hero who is recalled from disgrace by the city officials who decide he is the only one with the knowledge/skills to solve the murder of a public guardian-the city's first murder in years. He's typically reluctant, nosy, lustful, burdened with old guilt, and all those other noir detective traits, but his character never quite fully develops. It doesn't help that Quint's parents were both founding members of the Enlightenment, and that his mother is the head of the council. In any event, he is assigned to track down a grisly killer before any damage is done to the tourist industry. This part of the book (ie. the story) is pretty standard stuff, and the few red herrings are easily recognized for what they are. If you're looking for a mystery with an unusual setting, thus might fit the bill, just don't expect the story to live up to the milieu. Future entries in the series may be more fulfilling.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates