Rating: 
Summary: Challenging, well-written, a delight
Review: After four mystery-thrillers ("Koko", "Mystery", "The Throat", and "The Hellfire Club"), "Mr. X" marks Peter's return to the domain of supernatural/psychological horror. This is one of his best horror books, second only to "Shadowland". The dialogue is flawless, the characters are as real as one could ask for, and the horror itself is subtle and surreal. The story is about an Illinois family whose members manifest strange powers. It's about a particular member of this dynasty -- Ned Dunstan -- and his doppleganger twin. It's about the twins' disturbed father who knows that he is the center of the world, and his purpose is to kill. It's about Ned Dunstan, at long last, returning home to Illinois and coming to terms with his bizarre heritage.In a way, "Mr. X" combines features of the author's later mystery-thrillers and earlier horror books. Straub is a first-rate writer who refuses to supply us with Harlequin-horror. He towers above authors like Stephen King and Clive Barker. He makes authors like Dean Koontz and John Saul unworthy of mention.
Rating: 
Summary: IF YOU'VE A PENCHANT FOR THE PARANORMAL
Review: For those with a penchant for the paranormal there are shivers galore in this thriller-diller from Peter Straub. A master of the Stephen King-type genre, Straub has proven himself in such spooky offerings as "Houses Without Doors" and "The Talisman," which he collaborated on with King. This time out protagonist Ned Dunstan receives an unwelcome birthday gift each year - he is haunted on his natal day by scenes of malevolence, visions of rampant murder that he is seemingly forced to witness. The perpetrator of these heinous crimes is a sinister figure in black whom Ned has come to call Mr. X. As his 35th birthday nears, Ned, a computer programmer, returns to his Illinois hometown, drawn there by a feeling that his mother, Star Dunstan, is dying. She is, indeed, in ICU. A former jazz singer, Star played almost as small a role in Ned's childhood as the father whom he never knew. Before dying she tells Ned the name of his father, and another name - Robert. Before there's time for decent mourning, mysterious and frightening things happen to Ned: he accused of crimes he could not have committed, and the fearsome vision that has haunted him each year recurs even more vividly. Some of the Dunstan family secrets are revealed as Ned renews acquaintance with his elderly aunts, an especially gifted trio adept at teleportation. The aunts throw roadblocks at Ned as he searches for his father, partially to protect him and partially to guard their own secrets. Don't worry, Straub doesn't disappoint as far as love interests go - there's a gorgeous young woman, Laurie Hatch, who has some dark family secrets of her own. There's complex plotting in Mr. X, which doesn't allow the tale to slide easily into home plate. There are freakish curlycues and horrific twists before we learn who Robert is and, most importantly, the identity of Mr. X. At times Straub does seem to go on about peripheral ideas; it's a hefty read. But, it is vintage Straub, and his fans will relish it. - Gail Cooke
Rating:
Summary: IF YOU'VE A PENCHANT FOR THE PARANORMAL
Review: For those with a penchant for the paranormal there are shivers galore in this thriller-diller from Peter Straub. A master of the Stephen King-type genre, Straub has proven himself in such spooky offerings as "Houses Without Doors" and "The Talisman," which he collaborated on with King. This time out protagonist Ned Dunstan receives an unwelcome birthday gift each year - he is haunted on his natal day by scenes of malevolence, visions of rampant murder that he is seemingly forced to witness. The perpetrator of these heinous crimes is a sinister figure in black whom Ned has come to call Mr. X. As his 35th birthday nears, Ned, a computer programmer, returns to his Illinois hometown, drawn there by a feeling that his mother, Star Dunstan, is dying. She is, indeed, in ICU. A former jazz singer, Star played almost as small a role in Ned's childhood as the father whom he never knew. Before dying she tells Ned the name of his father, and another name - Robert. Before there's time for decent mourning, mysterious and frightening things happen to Ned: he accused of crimes he could not have committed, and the fearsome vision that has haunted him each year recurs even more vividly. Some of the Dunstan family secrets are revealed as Ned renews acquaintance with his elderly aunts, an especially gifted trio adept at teleportation. The aunts throw roadblocks at Ned as he searches for his father, partially to protect him and partially to guard their own secrets. Don't worry, Straub doesn't disappoint as far as love interests go - there's a gorgeous young woman, Laurie Hatch, who has some dark family secrets of her own. There's complex plotting in Mr. X, which doesn't allow the tale to slide easily into home plate. There are freakish curlycues and horrific twists before we learn who Robert is and, most importantly, the identity of Mr. X. At times Straub does seem to go on about peripheral ideas; it's a hefty read. But, it is vintage Straub, and his fans will relish it. - Gail Cooke
Rating: 
Summary: Contrived, convoluted, dull
Review: I have been an avid reader of Peter Straub ever since I read his amazing novel "Ghost Story". Unfortunately, however, of all the novels I've read since, I've only found two ("Shadowlands" and "If You Could See Me Now") to be even remotely comparable. I still read him in hopes of finding a third. Mr. X starts out quite well...I was thinking that this one might be the next gem. But it quickly becomes confusing and contrived. Characters are thrown in, it seems, for good measure and there's way too many of them. In fact, during the latter half of the book, I found myself wondering what exactly the point was to Robert, his "other half". Although staged as a main character, he seems to have very little relevance. But maybe I just missed it. I did doze off quite a few times while reading. If you want a creepy, well written horror novel, read "Ghost Story", "Shadowlands", or "If you Could See Me Now(all, I think, far better than anything Stephen King's ever written). If you want semi-creepy, semi-well written, read "Floating Dragon", "The Hellfire Club", or "Julia". Otherwise, stay away from Straub. His good stuff is really good. His bad stuff is really bad.
Rating: 
Summary: Well, not an encouraging review I think
Review: I have never been a fan for Lovecraft or Poe type; a story is frightening for me only if I root for the characters and if they are in peril; other than that, monsters from other worlds, sounds, convoluted giant creatures or some imaginative books do nothing for me. That's why Stephen King did the trick for me. From the moment I read him for the first time (the wonderful "Mist") he grabbed me in total awe. And so far I have yet to find any other horror writer that so daringly, skillfuly and masterfully yields modern horror stories: Salem's Lot, Shining, Pet Semetary and Christine are yet to be exceeded stories. The horror in them is actually the horror of 20th century man: alcoholism, master cards, highways, alienation of people etc. In my humble opinion, King's clever take-on horror literature is a five star one: He understands that strong characters and down-to-earth dialogue and a sense of location make a horror book (at least modern ones) unforgettable. He singlehandedly made a genre stand on its feet and made it his own particularly created a Stephen King genre. But I also gave up to expect any other Salem's Lot or Christine from the Master; I don't know why: He stubbornly rejected producing straight horror stories after the Dark Half. He mostly shifted to fansaty/ dutifulworks and SF. That's not too bad because he is still the best dialogue and character writer in the world with clever observations and a strange type of humor, which I find quite amusing and Mr. King is still very clever, whether or not you make like it (see Dark Tower series) That's why I started to hunt for other horror writers; I've never read anything apart from SK before (except Dean Koontz, whom I think must be the poorest author-caricature in the world) I had read Talisman so I grabbed Ghost Story by Mr Straub. Well, he was as good as the Master but was more unaccessible. No problem there:; if a book keeps you awake until the morning of a long business day then there must be something in it. Ghost Story was followed by Floating Drogan and Shadowland. While the former was very good, the second one left me worried: Straub reflected the best characteristics of a SK-type writing but he also paints a very complex picture; the plotlines, the characters...somehow become hard to follow. But that is a little bit unnecessary in horror literature; because horror books demand to be fast-reading ones so that as soon as a scene grabs you, you should be able to shiver and move to the next scene like a freight train wondering on how the hell this will clear out (try Christine). But Straup sometimes puts huge blocks in front of this freight train. Anyway, my last try was Koko which suffered the same problemb As I really liked Peter Straub (even his bads are not so bad as is the case with the Master), after a long time I tried to read Mr. X The story started very well; there is something sinister in the death of his mother; there are some secrets not revealed; these secrets involve other-worldly things; Ned Dunstant is trying to protect himself against those other-worldly and worldly horrors; the town seems to be full of intricate relations. What starts great beginsg to puff and huff in the middle. May be Mr. Straub is very clever maybe he is starting with a broad sketch of floppy discs: he throws several characters with several no-where-going subplots and then tries to tie each and everyone; but the reader is generally left confused who died why or who was whose servant or who went there etc etc. Even in the middle you keep waiting for a big armageddon between the good (Ned and his aunts) and the evil (Mr X and his masters and servants); but there is a sudden super-homage to Lovecraft; a dream scene, a collusion with the chief police officer and suddenly you face the END. Well characterisation is good; Nel and his aunts are wonderfully drawn out; they talk like real people; but there are some overdone things:; Nel comes to town with nothing and leaves there almost a billionaire; you can't help yourself that all the evil and good in that town served for one purpose: To make him rich and happy. By the way family connections become too complex to understand and care At the end what I felt was: Peter Straub's writing is still high quality, powerful. He writes characters and dialogues well; his level of humor is better than the ones I read; but same problems with Shadowland: Too much symbolism-like things, too many sub-plots; too many unanswered questions;too complex writing for a horror writer. Of course I will go on reading him; next the Lost Boy Lost Girl because he is very good at creating sinister atmospheres (even if they sometimes do not bring any fruitfil thing) but he is far from Ghost Story days or Salem's Lot, Pet Semetary or Nightshift horror. One of the reviewers below claims that Douglas Clegg. Don't believe; he is very weak indeed
Rating:
Summary: Well, not an encouraging review I think
Review: I have never been a fan for Lovecraft or Poe type; a story is frightening for me only if I root for the characters and if they are in peril; other than that, monsters from other worlds, sounds, convoluted giant creatures or some imaginative books do nothing for me. That's why Stephen King did the trick for me. From the moment I read him for the first time (the wonderful "Mist") he grabbed me in total awe. And so far I have yet to find any other horror writer that so daringly, skillfuly and masterfully yields modern horror stories: Salem's Lot, Shining, Pet Semetary and Christine are yet to be exceeded stories. The horror in them is actually the horror of 20th century man: alcoholism, master cards, highways, alienation of people etc. In my humble opinion, King's clever take-on horror literature is a five star one: He understands that strong characters and down-to-earth dialogue and a sense of location make a horror book (at least modern ones) unforgettable. He singlehandedly made a genre stand on its feet and made it his own particularly created a Stephen King genre. But I also gave up to expect any other Salem's Lot or Christine from the Master; I don't know why: He stubbornly rejected producing straight horror stories after the Dark Half. He mostly shifted to fansaty/ dutifulworks and SF. That's not too bad because he is still the best dialogue and character writer in the world with clever observations and a strange type of humor, which I find quite amusing and Mr. King is still very clever, whether or not you make like it (see Dark Tower series) That's why I started to hunt for other horror writers; I've never read anything apart from SK before (except Dean Koontz, whom I think must be the poorest author-caricature in the world) I had read Talisman so I grabbed Ghost Story by Mr Straub. Well, he was as good as the Master but was more unaccessible. No problem there:; if a book keeps you awake until the morning of a long business day then there must be something in it. Ghost Story was followed by Floating Drogan and Shadowland. While the former was very good, the second one left me worried: Straub reflected the best characteristics of a SK-type writing but he also paints a very complex picture; the plotlines, the characters...somehow become hard to follow. But that is a little bit unnecessary in horror literature; because horror books demand to be fast-reading ones so that as soon as a scene grabs you, you should be able to shiver and move to the next scene like a freight train wondering on how the hell this will clear out (try Christine). But Straup sometimes puts huge blocks in front of this freight train. Anyway, my last try was Koko which suffered the same problemb As I really liked Peter Straub (even his bads are not so bad as is the case with the Master), after a long time I tried to read Mr. X The story started very well; there is something sinister in the death of his mother; there are some secrets not revealed; these secrets involve other-worldly things; Ned Dunstant is trying to protect himself against those other-worldly and worldly horrors; the town seems to be full of intricate relations. What starts great beginsg to puff and huff in the middle. May be Mr. Straub is very clever maybe he is starting with a broad sketch of floppy discs: he throws several characters with several no-where-going subplots and then tries to tie each and everyone; but the reader is generally left confused who died why or who was whose servant or who went there etc etc. Even in the middle you keep waiting for a big armageddon between the good (Ned and his aunts) and the evil (Mr X and his masters and servants); but there is a sudden super-homage to Lovecraft; a dream scene, a collusion with the chief police officer and suddenly you face the END. Well characterisation is good; Nel and his aunts are wonderfully drawn out; they talk like real people; but there are some overdone things:; Nel comes to town with nothing and leaves there almost a billionaire; you can't help yourself that all the evil and good in that town served for one purpose: To make him rich and happy. By the way family connections become too complex to understand and care At the end what I felt was: Peter Straub's writing is still high quality, powerful. He writes characters and dialogues well; his level of humor is better than the ones I read; but same problems with Shadowland: Too much symbolism-like things, too many sub-plots; too many unanswered questions;too complex writing for a horror writer. Of course I will go on reading him; next the Lost Boy Lost Girl because he is very good at creating sinister atmospheres (even if they sometimes do not bring any fruitfil thing) but he is far from Ghost Story days or Salem's Lot, Pet Semetary or Nightshift horror. One of the reviewers below claims that Douglas Clegg. Don't believe; he is very weak indeed
Rating:
Summary: finally someone to read between King books...
Review: Mr. X was my first Straub book sans Stephen King. I didn't know what to expect of his 'solo' work. I have been fairly glued to a handful of authors (King, Rice, Lumley and Steven Baxter), and was hoping that, at the very least, Straub could be a distraction during the lull between releases from my favorites. Wow! I'm glad I gave him a chance! Creative,thought provoking, frightening,surprising...I look forward to reading his entire body of work!
Rating:
Summary: DON'T EXPECT FORMULAIC PLOT
Review: Ned Dunstan is returning home, drawn to Edgerton, Illinois knowing that his mother (Star Dunstan) is dying. Star has kept many secrets from her son, but on her deathbed she reveals a whopper: who his father is. Ned's paternal heritage had always been in question and now, after years of wondering, he has a name. But an enigmatic one. No one is willing to talk about Ned's father, especially Ned's mysterious and (apparently) powerful aunts, May, Nettie and Joy. And by "powerful", I mean supernatural powers (telekenesis, teleportation, etc.). Ned goes on a quest to discover who his father is and why he's been having such hellish nightmares all his life. He witnesses murders through the eyes of someone and is unable to pull himself away from these horrific scenes. And Ned soon discovers that he too has a dark side. Someone (who might be his brother) "shadows" him and helps protect him from harm by any means possible (including eliminating anyone or anything that gets in his way). Ned soon discovers his own supernatural potential, as well as some interesting family tree information. The most interesting thing about this book was that it held you in a place and you knew EXACTLY where you were. I loved that. The twisting of characters and showing their good and dark sides also aided me (as the reader) in realizing that these were fully formed and error-prone people (not just totally good protagonists and totally bad antagonists). My only disappointment was that I would have liked to have seen a more definitive connection between Ned's life and his love of music. I felt that got dropped by the wayside a bit because of the necessity of Mr. Straub to reveal Mr. X's life and family heritage. But all in all a good read. Rating = A
Rating: 
Summary: Nothing Literary or Horrifying About this Mess
Review: Peter Straub has often been described as a "literary" horror writer, a craftsman whose poetic use of language and carefully developed characters rank a definite step above Dean Koontz, John Saul, Stephen King, and other pulp-fiction hacks. Even some of the other reviews posted on this website praise MR. X as a work of great literature rather than popular fiction. MR. X is my fourth experience with a Peter Straub book. I thoroughly enjoyed GHOST STORY and FLOATING DRAGON, both entertaining and well-written supernatural horror novels (though hardly literary) and stumbled through the plodding, poorly conceived MAGIC TERROR. I must confess, the dreadful MAGIC TERROR almost caused me to swear off of Peter Straub for good. But when I saw MR. X for sale in hardcover ...in the bargain bin, I took the plunge once more. What I found was a wordy, meandering mess that contained few horror or supernatural elements and suffered from a convoluted plot that read more like a Gothic soap opera than a story of terror and suspense. As if that wasn't bad enough, Straub added to this mixture a list of painfully trite cliches, such as the "mysterious twin", the "evil woods that continuously beckon", the "dark family secrets that everyone knows about except for our protagonist", the "dark stranger whose face we never see" whose name--"Mr. X"--is in itself as unoriginal as it is silly. The novel almost reads like a parody of the horror genre. Now don't get me wrong. I don't mind a cliche or two; heck, without cliches, there would be no horror genre at all. But Straub doesn't do anything intelligent, compelling, or remotely interesting with any of these cliches. He simply throws them into his melodramatic, soap-opera plot and hopes they'll float. They don't. In the end, MR. X is a disappointment on all fronts. Fans of the supernatural will be let down by how little the supernatural actually figures in this novel, and fans of gut-wrenching horror will probably laugh at the contrived sinister nature of (scary organ music, please) "Mr. X". Perhaps fans of Robin Cook or Danielle Steel will enjoy the contrived, meandering plot, but it's unlikely those folks will bother with a Peter Straub novel to begin with. There is nothing even remotely literary about Peter Straub or his latest novel, MR. X. Some of his other works are supremely entertaining, well-written horror novels, but to exalt him to the status of a literary figure and place him alongside Edgar Allen Poe, H.P. Lovecraft, Richard Matheson, or Bram Stoker is ridiculous. I suppose this novel is worth a try if you're a die-hard Peter Straub loyalist or if you're an absolute H.P. Lovecraft fanatic who enjoys reading pretentious allusions (and MR. X is full of pretentious allusions to Lovecraft); all others should probably avoid. In the meantime, if you're looking for a truly great horror novel, try Richard Matheson's I AM LEGEND or William Peter Blatty's THE EXORCIST--even if you can't find them in a bargain bin.
Rating:
Summary: Should have been called A+!'
Review: Peter straub is Agatha Cristi of horror novels. I found lots of people who read crime thrillers but never read Agatha Cristi! I think main reason is- unlike the other so-called crime thrillers, in A.C.'s book you need to THINK! And who like that. People here read book which they can read while smoking,travelling,or anythime. Well if you are from this crowd then DO NOT read Straub! Peter Straub's writing nmneeds EXTREME attention and you need to ponder,go back,think. Always rewarding. I read Ghost story and Floating Dragon- I dont know how many time!!! Love those. Read Mr.X two times and no ashamed o accept that I missed a lot first time! So if you want to enjoy your horror in your mind then read Peter Straub. If you want to read book with graphics details then read any 5.99/6.99 book available in Stores! They are like that! Most of new authors do that! Hah! WHY WOULD STEPHEN KING WRITES TWO BOOKS WITH HIM OUT OF 100'S OF OTHER HORROW AUTHORS?
| 
