<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: this is probably the best of the WWIII series
Review: but slater screwed up didn't the book before this have a massive nuclear war where missles where launched on US and Russian targets yet no mention of the fact in this book that is the reason that I can't give this book 5 stars
Rating: 
Summary: Arctic front good but lacks any action
Review: I am sick and tired of all the people complaining about Ian Slater's errors for units or weapons names or weight! Who cares? The names have nothing to do with the plot!Now to Arctic Front, it was a interesting well thought out book but lacked action. I also didn't get why one division(31st) would attack Freeman's army? Anyhow I thought the book was good enough to read and I plan to read the sequels
Rating:
Summary: WWIII: Artic Front has severral glaring errors
Review: WWIII: Artic Front has many glaring error. For instance, in the previous book there was a nuclear exchange near the end but in this book they are already launching subs from a base that took a direct hit by a nuclear missle. In addition, General Freeman found time to fight in the Gulf War when he was leading the army in korea and europe. He was also able to lead the fighting in Minsk and lead the russian surrender precedings as he was being held captive by the chinese. If you can let go of those error the book is still enjoyable to read.
<< 1 >>
| 
