Death on the Downs: A Fethering Mystery (Fethering Mystery)

Rating:
Summary: BOTH OF THE FETHERING SERIES ARE GOOD
Review: I ENJOYED BOTH OF THIS NEW SERIES, AND WAIT FOR BRETTS NEXT BOOK TO COME OUT ESPECIALLY THE CHARLES PARIS, AND MRS PARGETER, I FIND HIM TO BE A PLEASENT WRITER WITH LOTS OF WIT, I HAVE READ ABOUT EVERY THING HE HAS OUT NOW, WHATS COMING UP? HOPE ITS SOON . A GA READER

Rating:
Summary: As always, a "good read"
Review: I have read 26 of Mr. Brett's books. This book, the second in his new series, is not up to his usual standards. Previousely his lead characters were well presented, warts and all. Carole is not as colorful a character as Charles Paris or Mrs. Pargeter although she is improving. I could do without Jude, she's rather boring, in fact the dog is more engaging. Ted has real possibilities and the addition of other villagers would help. With this said, I did enjoy the book although I'll probably wait for the paperback next time.

Rating:
Summary: I miss Brett's usual wit
Review: I'm a huge fan of Simon Brett's "Charles Paris" series, a moderate fan of his "Mrs.Pargeter" series. In his mysteries I always enjoy his wit and sense of irony particularly as regards his characters' (both principal and minor) lack of self-knowledge. In "Death on the Downs" Carol Seddons inadvertantly discovers a dismembered skeleton in a village near her town. Carol, a button-down (or at least a Burberry raincoat) type teams up with her free-spirited neighbor Jude to solve the case. What ensues is an exploration of the village's history and the interdynamics of its residents. Brett describes the gentrifying of the village, including the takeover of the local pub by a countrywide hospitality chain. Humble cottages become yuppie showplaces and skyrocketing property values make living in the village out of reach for working class people who were born and raised there. This class distinction is one of the causes of the action that follows and makes for amusing moments. Of one of the new homes Brett wonders whether it really needed both a turret and a belltower.

The situation is ripe for satire and yet Brett's storyline is grim, quite possibly due to the focus on Carol who really is quite dour. My sense is that Brett relishes characters with quirks and neither Jude nor Carol have many. I found the mystery itself dissatisfying and can only recommend it for Brett's talent for description of the village and some of the peripheral characters.

Rating:
Summary: I miss Brett's usual wit
Review: I'm a huge fan of Simon Brett's "Charles Paris" series, a moderate fan of his "Mrs.Pargeter" series. In his mysteries I always enjoy his wit and sense of irony particularly as regards his characters' (both principal and minor) lack of self-knowledge. In "Death on the Downs" Carol Seddons inadvertantly discovers a dismembered skeleton in a village near her town. Carol, a button-down (or at least a Burberry raincoat) type teams up with her free-spirited neighbor Jude to solve the case. What ensues is an exploration of the village's history and the interdynamics of its residents. Brett describes the gentrifying of the village, including the takeover of the local pub by a countrywide hospitality chain. Humble cottages become yuppie showplaces and skyrocketing property values make living in the village out of reach for working class people who were born and raised there. This class distinction is one of the causes of the action that follows and makes for amusing moments. Of one of the new homes Brett wonders whether it really needed both a turret and a belltower.

The situation is ripe for satire and yet Brett's storyline is grim, quite possibly due to the focus on Carol who really is quite dour. My sense is that Brett relishes characters with quirks and neither Jude nor Carol have many. I found the mystery itself dissatisfying and can only recommend it for Brett's talent for description of the village and some of the peripheral characters.

Rating:
Summary: The second of a very good series
Review: In Death on the Downs, Carole Seddon finds herself looking for a place to walk without running into too many people. Her dog Gulliver has cut his paw on a can on the beach and can't walk with her. Carole has difficulty talking to strangers and doesn't want to go to a place that has many walkers. She goes to a nearby village of Weldisham and takes a walk on the deserted downs there. It starts to rain, so she takes shelter in a dilapidated old barn. Underneath her bench she finds two bags of human bones. She calls the police and assumes that her involvement ends there. Carole keeps thinking back on the mystery, however and the people of the small village. With the help of her friend Jude. They solve the mystery together.

This is a rather dark mystery. There are no characters that the reader automatically roots for. Even the protagonist Carole Seddon is a quiet, withdrawn and not altogether sympathetic character. The mystery is very good, with lots of twists and turns, and although I suspected the murderer, I wasn't sure until the end. This is a very good series.

Rating:
Summary: BOTH OF THE FETHERING SERIES ARE GOOD
Review: This was such a disappointing book for a Simon Brett fan like myself I was left wondering why he'd put his name on it. The likeable, if flawed, characters of Mrs. Partager and Charles Paris are what makes those books so winning. Here, the characters are not only unlikeable, they are shallow, wooden and one-dimensional. Instead of showing us personalities by "action", he "describes" what people are like. These are not direct quotes, but examples of writing style--"Jude is a very outgoing person who is attractive to many people, including most men" or "Carole is a rather shy, diffident person who likes to be around Jude and is curious about her free and easy lifestyle"). Thank you for telling me, but I'd rather figure that out myself from the character's behavior.

Usually, Brett's writing is witty and urbane. It was hard to swallow stuff like..."Jude was thinking about the man in London she'd had a relationship with"...hmm. Wouldn't she be thinking about him by name? Or, after a description of Brian Helling..."He was very dangerous." Show me.

Also, the book was very poorly edited. In the copy I read, at the climax of the action Brian Helling was called "Nick Helling".
So, I guess you can see I was disappointed! I hope if this series continues Brett will try a lot harder to make it worthy of his talent.

Rating:
Summary: A Step Below...
Review: This was such a disappointing book for a Simon Brett fan like myself I was left wondering why he'd put his name on it. The likeable, if flawed, characters of Mrs. Partager and Charles Paris are what makes those books so winning. Here, the characters are not only unlikeable, they are shallow, wooden and one-dimensional. Instead of showing us personalities by "action", he "describes" what people are like. These are not direct quotes, but examples of writing style--"Jude is a very outgoing person who is attractive to many people, including most men" or "Carole is a rather shy, diffident person who likes to be around Jude and is curious about her free and easy lifestyle"). Thank you for telling me, but I'd rather figure that out myself from the character's behavior.

Usually, Brett's writing is witty and urbane. It was hard to swallow stuff like..."Jude was thinking about the man in London she'd had a relationship with"...hmm. Wouldn't she be thinking about him by name? Or, after a description of Brian Helling..."He was very dangerous." Show me.

Also, the book was very poorly edited. In the copy I read, at the climax of the action Brian Helling was called "Nick Helling".
So, I guess you can see I was disappointed! I hope if this series continues Brett will try a lot harder to make it worthy of his talent.

Rating:
Summary: A good mystery
Review: With her friend Jude away for an indefinite time and her dog with an injured foot, divorcee Carole Seddon forgoes her usual walk on the Feathering beach. Instead, she drives to the West Sussex town of Weldisham to walk on the Downs for her morning constitution. Just as she's about to head back to the car, it starts pouring and she takes refuge in an abandoned barn.

While waiting for the rain to abate, Carole, sitting on some wooden planks, slips, jarring her seat into revealing fertilizer bags filled with human bones. She calls the police who realize they have a criminal case on their hands. Much to Carole's surprise she wants to find the identity of the remains and how they got in the barn. When Jude returns, she's as eager as Carole is to solve the case. The two friends, in their own way, begin to investigate.

Carole and Jude are as different as two people can be yet their friendship is so real and dynamic it is electrifying. Their thought processes are very different yet they always end up agreeing with one another on a point of contention. The atmosphere of an English village gives DEATH ON THE DOWNS a delightful ambiance that the armchair traveler will enjoy.

Harriet Klausner