Justice Hall

Rating:
Summary: Well Worth the Wait
Review: After finishing O Jerusalem I was ready to pick up the next book in the series. Unfortunately I did not realize how long I would have to wait. Luckily, in the end it was everything I had hoped for. I am a big fan of the Russell/Holmes series and I feel that this was a wonderful episode in their advenutres together. We meet a great variety of new characters (perhaps we will see Iris again soon?) and spend a lot of time with Mary. One reviewer was somewhat upset by the lack of direct time spent with Holmes but considering that these are "Mary Russell Novel"s I can't see how that could be terribly surprising, although while reading the book I personally never found Holmes conspicuously absent from the story. There is still plenty of collaboration between our heroine and her partner we just get to see a lot of Mary's perspective rather that Holmes's perspective reflected through her. I found Gabriel's mystery heartwrenching and I thought that the entire plot was well developed. I think this is an excellent continuation of the series and I hope the next book will be as equally well written! If Ms. King happens upon this, I am waiting anxiously!

Rating:
Summary: A Wonderful Addition to the Russell Series!
Review: Before you read this, you really must read the fifth book of the series, "O Jerusalem." Without this volume, this book makes no real sense. I wonder why they don't make a deal for buying this book with "O Jerusalem"...

The book is a ready and welcome story to the Russell series with the coming of the Hazr brothers once again into the lives of Russell and Holmes in quite an unusual way. I sure don't want to spoil it for you, but I'll tell you that you'll enjoy it much more than you can imagine! The plot is ready and waiting to be read, wonderfully done and spectacular in its make.

This is the one book in the series when I actually cried. I didn't let the waterworks come in any of the books, not even "A Mostrous Regiment of Women," but I did let them fall in this one. This book is so wonderfully deep and emotional, but it has its lighter side as well. Simply the variety of Laurie R. King's books are wonderful, yet they still have the same wonderful voice in them: Russell.

A book to be reckoned with, and a spectacular story for the latest of Ms. King's works!

Rating:
Summary: Twangs My Feminist Heartstrings
Review: I grew up on Superman, the Lone Ranger, Sherlock Holmes, and assorted other male heros. So the heros of my own novels tend to be male. I have to make a conscious effort to cast a woman in a heroic part in one of my sf/f novels, though I managed it in DREAMSPY they tell me.

I could never have accepted Sherlock Holmes as a woman in some alternate universe continuation. Laurie R. King has found the perfect compromise -- an apprentice who is a)female, b)a love interest who becomes Holmes' wife, and c) oh, very much a hero in her own right, without losing the characteristics of a woman of her time. (she reminds me of my grandmother)

Many of us think of the 1970's as the most significant period of feminism. But the 1920's were pivotal in changing the way women think about themselves too. JUSTICE HALL is set in 1923, in and around a ducal country house, a mansion slowly being taxed into a ruin.

The 1920's were an interesting time in England -- there was still a very strong feudal heirarchy in charge of everything, but the modern world was fast emerging from within that caste system.

Laurie R. King has captured the flavor of that era without an overburden of unnecessary detail. She has used the correct words to name various things we don't see everyday in the 21st century. She has transported us to a drafty, cold, impossible to heat, understaffed mansion and made us believe every word.

Here Holmes isn't even certain he has a case, and with Mary Russell on the job, he ends up solving 2 cases.

Over the course of this series of novels, we have seen Mary Russell become proficient in Holmes' "methods" -- and with that proficiency has come Holmes' trust.

In JUSTICE HALL as in many of the other novels in this series, they work the case separately, but with beautiful coordination. I loved watching the two of them assessing the dual personalities displayed by their "guides" from O JERUSALEM. King has given us the vision of the deep cover secret agent's primary problem and made us believe every word.

One important point is contained in the author's afterword regarding the changes in the law pertaining to a soldier who deserts under fire or refuses an order under combat conditions. This is fiction rooted in historic reality, and yet still very definitely fiction.

What I like best of all I think is that now I get a chance to BE Sherlock Holmes by walking in Mary Russell's shoes!

I had the delightful experience of finishing JUSTICE HALL and starting THE GAME immediately. For those new to these books, I'd recommend amassing as many of them in the correct order as you can and just reading them straight through.

Rating:
Summary: Good characters but too many contradictions
Review: I only recently discovered the Russell-series, so I had the advantage to read all the books in short order. I would wholehearteadly say that I like Justice Hall most fo all but not for Holmes, Russell or the interaction between the two of them.

I like it for another resson: Ali and Mahmoud or in this case Alistair and Marsh (and also in addition Iris) are the best "guest"charcaters Laurie R. King wrote in the whole series. They are vivid, believable, interesting and the relationshsip between them is just fascinating (a shame-maraiage between Iris and Marsh on oen side, a strong subtext between Marsh and Alistair on the other which may be interpreted as an homosexual relationship). I definetily hope there will be more of them in future books.

But there is too less Russell in the book and even lesser Holmes. And Holmes is - at least for me - the reason why I buy the series. I don't necessary expect him to be more involved in the "action." But at least he should reflect more on the events and persons involved. For example I would have liked to read his opinion about the relationshipb etween Marsh, iris and AListair. But he onyl gives a smile as asnwer of Russlels (hence the readers) question.

At the first sight the plot seems excating but on the second thought there are too many and too big wholes and contradictiosn in it. Mrs. King even seemed unably to remember the names she gave Ali and Mahmoud at there first mention in The Beekeeper's Apprentice (which were Albert and Mathew at this time not Alistair and Maurice). In the end things were rushed to much as in most of the series'installments and questions especially about the motivations behind the events remain unanswered (or are at least not satiesfying answered).

So my fazit are mixed feelings about the books: it's great for the "guest"characters but it misses a lot of things when it comes to the main protagonists and the plot as a whole. Neverthless: if you like the series or at least if you liked O Jerusalem you should read it.

Rating:
Summary: Another Winner
Review: I really enjoy this series. I think that author Laurie R. King has done one of the best, probably the best, jobs of keeping Sherlock Holmes alive and well. The books that revolve around him and his wife Mary Russell are well-written, well-plotted, and well-characterized.
In this entry, Mary & Sherlock are summoned to an old English estate to help out two friends. One of them is the newly appointed Duke but does not want to be there, preferring to return to the Middle East where he had lived for twenty years doing undercover work for Sherlock's brother, Mycroft.
Someone is out to murder him, however, with their own eyes on the dukedom. There are suspects aplenty and lots of clues thrown in to entice the reader to guessing whodunnit.
Part of the story revolves around the past - another member of the family was put to death in front of the firing squad for treason during WWI and Mary & Sherlock work to solve that mystery as well. Some of that story is told through the warfield diary of that soldier and some of the passages are truly heartbreaking to read.
An excellent book, both as a mystery and as a novel.

Rating:
Summary: Holmes and Russell on a Splendid Jaunt
Review: I'm a fan of Laurie King - Beekeeper's Apprentice was really great. I enjoyed reading this book - read it straight through in one sitting - but I think that she is running out of room in this series.

Rating:
Summary: Not the best, but Better than Most!
Review: I've read and thoroughly enjoyed all the Russell-Holmes novels, starting with THE BEEKEEPER'S APPRENTICE, the best of this series and one of the most wondrous exercises in "what if" ever composed. I also greatly admire A MONSTROUS REGIMENT OF WOMEN and O JERUSALEM.

This latest book (like Peters' last Amelia Peabody novel) feels slightly tired, with a plot that repeats the past too much and, even worse, deals almost exclusively with the aristocracy and not with the whole spectrum of society, as do King's other novels of the series. I also found the two cousins a bit unreal in this book--as they definitely were not in O JERUSALEM. Nor was this the outraged indictment of British leadership in World War One, as one of the blurbs led me to believe. If you want a savage treatment of that in mystery format, go to other authors, especially to Reginald Hill's THE WOOD BEYOND.

However, all criticism aside, King remains one of the most skillful and intelligent novelists writing today. Her characters, especially Holmes, contain all the quirks of inconsistency we find in people yet maintain sympathy. Her descriptions are unsurpassed and the scope of her learning takes my breath away. So--I do hope you'll choose an earthier plot next time around, Laurie, but even this novel, the least of the series, is better than most mysteries!

Rating:
Summary: Fiat Justitia
Review: Laurie R King's "Justice Hall" is the latest entry in her superb series featuring Sherlock Holmes (yes, the famous detective) and his wife and partner in investigation Mary Russell. While "Justice Hall" is somewhat atypical as a Sherlock Holmes story - either of the Conan Doyle canon or even of this series - it is no less satisfying as an instalment in the series. In fact, I enjoyed it more thoroughly than many of the other novels in the series.

To begin with, I cannot over-stress the importance of reading "O Jerusalem" first. While set many years before the events in "Justice Hall", it is imperative to understand at least the basics of Holmes and Russell's work in Palestine with the Hazr brothers before the reader can grasp the finer points of this case. While this review will attempt to avoid any spoilers, some may be inevitable. Thus, if you don't want to risk knowing any of the twists, take it as read that this book is well worth the purchase price.

The plot begins almost immediately our heroes return from Dartmoor (events described in "The Moor"). No sooner are Holmes and Russell recovering from their adventures there, than a mysterious - but strangely familiar - stranger arrives at their door and collapses into Russell's arms.
Providing aid to this man leads Holmes and Russell to the magnificent country estate of Justice Hall, owned by Marsh (Maurice) Hughenfort, the latest in the line of an exceedingly aristocratic family. Additionally, it leads them to a reunion of sorts with the Hazrs, although under rather interesting circumstances.

The Hughenforts, you see, have a problem. The current Earl (Marsh) believes that a boy in France may actually be the rightful holder of the title - a view supported by his sister and brother-in-law, the rather shady Darling family.
Additionally, concern exists in the family as to the exact circumstances of the wartime death of the previous heir. All the family knows is that he died on the Western Front of the First World War, and the manner of notification leads them to suspect that he was actually executed.

Holmes and Russell, therefore, have the interesting tasks of trying to establish the background to the heir's death as well as attempting to find out if the French boy is the rightful Earl. What this means is that much of the early section of the book is taken up with loving descriptions of English country life with Marsh Hughenfort at Justice Hall.

Eventually, this calm is shattered in a shooting accident and Holmes and Russell begin to realise that these questions of succession are much more serious than they had previously assumed.

In a series of dramatic chases which take our intrepid pair everywhere from London to Lyons to a remote town in Canada, the mystery gradually reveals itself. Of course, as it does so, Russell has ample opportunity to reflect on all manner of things from the effects that time has had on her relationship to the Hazrs through to the inhumanity of the Great War.

The eventual denouement leaves a little to be desired, however the sheer sense of theatre with which King reveals all is very enjoyable. Suffice it to say that the absolute end of the novel turns into another "Holmes frantically chases the culprit" scene.

This is one of King's worthiest inclusions in her series and fans of the earlier novels are well advised to pick it up. The same caveat applies to this novel as to any of the others in the series - start at the beginning.

Rating:
Summary: Holmes aficianados deserve better
Review: Sherlock Holmes and his wife, Mary Russell, are summoned to Justice Hall, a rich estate headed by an old friend, Duke Marsh Hughenfort. They came to know Marsh as Mahmoud, an Arabian fighter, in a previous book, and his brother Alistair (known to them previously as Ali), has asked them to help Marsh cut his ties to the estate so that the two of them can live their lives contentedly in the Middle East. The problem is that, as rightful heir to the Dukedom, Marsh can't leave unless he is sure that there is an able successor. Without his vigilant watch, the estate will fall into the hands of a scheming couple, the Darlings, who act as Regents to the estate. Before long, it appears that someone in the line to the throne is attempting to clear the line of successors so that he can take the seat of power, but it isn't clear until the end which of the various suspects is responsible. In the end, the villain is revealed, and his ambitions are thwarted after Holmes and Russell unearth a five year old boy who is rightful heir.
The Good and the Bad:
On the one hand, I have a ton of criticisms of this book, all of which I feel are very valid and which spoiled the book almost entirely for me. On the other hand, I find myself open to the possibility of reading another novel about Holmes and his wife, so King must be doing something right.
One problem with the book is the writing, which is steeped in the overly-proper verbosity that characterized the Arthur Conan Doyle series. This is not so bad when there is action provided to keep us interested, but the book breaks down entirely for long stretches in which nothing exciting happens. For example, a ten page description of Russell's first tour of Justice Hall was particularly excruciating, as it was mostly description of room after description of room, with very little to break it up. It seemed to me almost as if King, having researched the time period extensively, didn't want to leave out the slightest detail. So, clearly, the pacing was poor, especially in the first third of the book or so. Not until an attempt on Marsh's life are we involved in the story, and that doesn't come until about 130 pages in.
Another problem is the characters which populate the novel. Many of the secondary characters are presented in monotone; for example, there is little said of Phillida Darling that does anything other than underline her tediousness and adherence to the social conventions of an aspiring socialite. The annoying characters are unfailingly annoying, while the members of Holmes' team are unfailingly good-hearted. Marsh's lesbian wife Iris is particularly gratingly good at everything and virtuous. The actual villain is only not obvious because he is conspicuously absent from the scene throughout the book. I don't know that he had a single line of dialogue-not a very interesting character, to say the least. Since the wheels of justice are turning inexorably, we get the idea that the villain will be captured, and his identity becomes completely trivial.
Holmes himself was humanized in the first Russell novel, which I can live with. However, I felt that in this novel there was nothing left of his exceptional abilities at all; anything that resembled the specific powers of deduction for which he is famous (induction, as all big fans know) is wasted on completely unimportant details, such as the fact that a letter was carried for a while before it was posted. The sole exception is when he applies himself to a game bird that has been shot, noting from the angle of various wounds that it had actually been shot twice. His expert disguise tactics also get a workout when he poses as a priest to make contact with an unsuspecting suspect. But for the most part, his near-supernatural powers of observation have dried up, it would appear. Russell, for her part, is gifted at reading the intentions and motives of people, based on their gestures and mannerisms. This is interesting as a counterpoint to Holmes' powers of analyzing evidence and constructing logical chains of thought; as a stand-alone act, it seems unrealistic, a worse fault given that the only reason to rob Holmes of his powers is in the service of realism.
For the most part, the mystery in this book is uncovered by tedious travel to witnesses who bear information waiting to be imparted. This is not very interesting detective work.
All of this might be forgiven, if the key evidence in their case, a marriage certificate, wasn't stumbled upon by Russell completely by accident moments before acquisition of the evidence becomes critical to presenting the climax. This was so shockingly artificial that I thought it must be a misdirection, but sadly it was meant to be swallowed.
My final complaint (the last one I feel like noting, anyhow) is that the villain, Ivo Hughenfort, is hopelessly outnumbered and outclassed, thereby preventing quite a bit of suspense. A lone criminal against a large team of outstanding detective, who are blessed with superior resources in every field imaginable, is a huge underdog. I want the villain to be an underdog only when it is in the service of mythologizing the hero; in this case, he was an underdog for no reason other than to give lots of characters their props.
What I learned:
The Lord of an estate in early 20th century England had a kind of alliance with the people of his area. They looked to him for guidance, leadership, and resources when they were in need, repaying the debt with their deference and fealty. At some point, tax laws made the agricultural resources that an estate typically had completely unable to provide for the system, and so the nobility had to turn to other enterprises in order to maintain revenue.



Rating:
Summary: Wonderful Return!
Review: Wonderful! The return of the Hazr brothers! I have waited two years for this book, and it was worth every second of the wait!
A reluctant, yet dutiful, heir. A loyal and desperate cousin. A surprise wife. A murdered and righteous man. A secret. And, of course, the remarkable pair of Holmes and Russell.
This was a great read. I would have to rank it right up there with "O Jerusalem," just behind "The Beekeeper's Apprentice" and "A Monstrous Regiment of Women." I absolutely devoured every page of this great book!