Rating: 
Summary: If you never read Final Judgement, this is an excellent book
Review: I too, think it's unconscionable to reissue a book under a new name without CLEARLY stating in the book's description that it's a re-issue.I actually put this in my cart, thinking that it was a new book by RNP. Pure chance led me to read the reviews. I would have demanded a refund of my money or worse if I had actually wasted my money purchasing a book I knew I had read previously under another name. How desperate can you get? I can't imagine that Patterson's hurting for money that badly, but I just lost a lot of respect for both he and his publishers. I certainly hope that this isn't being done with other authors.
Rating:
Summary: ...
Review: Patterson is one of the few authors around that can make the entire story interesting, not because you want to find out how it ends, but because you want to find out more about the characters. Each page brings you more into the lives of the characters. This book is no different. It has murders and sex and lawyers and secrets from the past.
I enjoy Patterson's flashbacks into a character's past that usually in some indirect way have a bearing on the outcome of the story.
But I have on problem with this book. THIS BOOK IS CALLED THE FINAL JUDGEMENT, NOT CAROLINE MASTERS. THIS IS NOT A NEW BOOK. IF YOU ARE A PATTERSON FAN, YOU PROBABLY READ THIS BOOK A FEW YEARS AGO. IT CAME OUT IN HARDCOVER AND PAPERBACK UNDER A DIFFERENT TITLE. WHY MUST PATTERSON RESORT TO TRICKERY AND A HORRIBLE NEW TITLE IN ORDER TO ENTICE PEOPLE TO BUY A BOOK THEY ALREADY READ. I CAN GUESS WHY. CAROLINE MASTERS WAS IN PROTECT AND DEFEND AND HE WANTED FANS OF THAT BOOK TO READ THE FINAL JUDGEMENT...
| 
