Gilles Deleuze: An Apprenticeship in Philosophy

Rating:
Summary: The Paradox of Enemies
Review: Hardt's book on Deleuze can be applauded for two reasons: its careful reading of Deleuze's texts and its attempt to situate them critically among continental philosophy. Hardt is a clear writer, and his insights are often quite powerful and suggestive. However, like most writer on Deleuze his "deleuzian" reading seeks too much to reconfigure the texts (Bergson,Nietzsche,and Spinoza). Beyond Hardt's text stands the imposing shadow of Hegel -- perhaps my only hesitation with its analysis. There is a desire to find unity in difference however radical this difference might be. The key problem of scholarship on Deleuze seem to be precisely how to read him -- is the project Deleuze has laid out to reread his texts as he has reread others? How is one to be Deluezian? This said, Hardt's work is exceptional in most areas.

Rating:
Summary: Hardt's Deleuze shows us how one can break whith Hegel
Review: In Gilles Deleuze, Michael Hardt analyzes the development of Deleuze's thought focussing on his works in the history of philosophy. From this historical perspective, Hardt renders possible to see the very intensive forcing bettwen Hegel's dialectics and this new afirmative thougth. The original reference to Scholastic's philosophy, for example, open the horizont to a new comprenhension of the arguments used by Deleuze, no so often explained. It would be very interesting to read this book in pararel whith Vicent Descombes' La même et l'autre, a totaly oposite interpretation of Deleuze, where the battle whith Hegel is mised from the very begining.