Rating: 
Summary: A book to make dumb people feel smart
Review: This book makes me positive that I can work for the NSA. I am working on my resume right now. If people like Susan Fletcher can be the bright star of the NSA, then I know I can work next to her (and help her along when things don't connect inside her head, which was often).I like a protaganist that tries to figure things out. In this book, things just happen to Susan. She doesn't "do" anything. She doesn't use her noodle for anything other than for the male characters to say "oooh, she's pretty" (which happens frequently in this book). The climax was a disaster. I'm not the brightest street lamp on the avenue, but I can usually figure out what's going to happen in a book a little before it happens. But in this book, for the climax, I broke the "code" about 8 pages before the NSA experts broke the code. I also read this after reading The Da Vinci Code, which was much better. As much as reading The Da Vinci Code made me want to read another Dan Brown book, this one makes me NOT want to read another Dan Brown book. Even the cute little "code" on the last page of the book was embarrassingly easy to figure out. Brown should have made *something* in this book challenging for the reader, but instead it's maddening to scream at the characters in the book to make the most obvious connections. It might be true that "WE ARE WATCHING YOU", but it is also true that "I AM DONE WITH DAN BROWN'S BOOKS".
Rating:
Summary: A Thriller for Homer Simpson
Review: If you haven't guessed the twists, intrigue and punchline in the first 50 pages you need to get out more. Seriously, this is a book you throw in the corner after you finish and look for a way to make up for lost time. 2 stars for the effort to create a Clancy-ish thriller, lots of effort. Unfortunately, you could toss out half the book and loose little of any meaningful story line or entertainment. The subject matter, (NSA, Crypto, Mega Computers), is interesting enough and has a few geeky delights. However, it seems like a short story / eZine article blown into a book by adding pure filler = and as a result it's a yawner. Not worth the money.
Rating: 
Summary: Great book, overkill on the twists, though.
Review: Might I first say that this book was great. It was well written, too. Obviously, the reviewer l_o_b took things in this book WAY too seriously. Look, if anybody really tried to comprehend all the code and cipher mumbo-jumbo taking place in the NSA, they'd fry their brains out. Hence, our il-tempered, iritated and antagonized critic, no doubt, fried his brains out while STILL coming to an incorrect conclusion. Our reviewer also got this one very important fact wrong: Mr. Brown did NOT make public-key encryption and ogther public programs look like high-technology stuff. Might I remind l_o_b that the author had two ex-cyptographers supply info on the book? I'd like to see l_o_b get into the NSA, if you ask me. In my opinion, l-o-b makes my winner for jerk of the year. PS- Judging by the over criticaly enraged dialog from l_o_b'sr eview, I would concur that he DID NOT solve the code in the back of the book. For people trying to solve the code, try looking up on Google Mary Queen of Scots and how they solved her encoded letters... Now, getting back on track with the real review. He did write the book well, but by the end, the twists do prove a little exaggrated, though they are mostly amusing. I would surely suggest that you do not jump ahead, even if it is a page, because most likely it will always give something away. But, given how complicated the subject was, I think Dan Brown wrote it in an easy way to udnerstand. When finding that the book is somewhat confusing (which I didn't), please consider what that pile of sensless junk and data meant to the author before he put it into words. I will agree, Susan Fletcher going from "Don't mess with me" woman to "I'm so scared", was a bit dissapointing, but I could only find one occasion which this happened: when she thought her fiance (NOT boyfriend) wasn't ever coming back. Other then that, there is no denial of her persistency kepy up. She never gave up! But there is one last critical comment... Considering the entire first few chapters of the author explaining the mental strength and organizational skills of Strathmore, any man with Strathmore's personality wouldn't go anywhere near as to twhat great length's Strathmore did to win Susan's heart. Oh, yes, and Hale? I never, EVER took him seriously. Not even from the start. Four stars, remarkable.
Rating: 
Summary: Plan 9 of Technothrillers
Review: I admit I read the entire book - the gaffes and moronic twists were so hysterical I just couldn't keep myself from being curious to find how far the author manages to go on the path from illiterate to silly to totally ludicrous. It is painfully obvious that author's IQ is not 170. It's not even above 70 - and his book, on the face of it, is insulting to intelligence of readers. Any literate person (and I don't mean computer geeks!) would find his description of the basic backround (i.e. cryptography and computer security) totally off the mark (like, confusing public-key crypto with public domain software (such as PGP), missing the fact that absolutely unbreakable cyphers are well-known (one-time pads), confusing worms with trojan horses, ad infinitum). I nearly laughed my lungs off reading his pathetic description of a firewall (X-eleven filters are corroding!!!!! FTP is falling!!! Hackers are circling like EFF sharks!!! Worm is eating the access filters!!!) His characters are so flat that even comic strips would be ashamed to use them. Dan Brown seems to be a one-plot writer: the scheme is exactly the same as in Da Vinci Code ("perfect" female and academic male go through chained trivial puzzles while a hero which seems to be an incarnation of all the Right Stuff turns out to be the villain employing a bodily deficient killer). The NSA employees are behaving like moronic adolescents (_all_ of them, including the Director, who seems only to be capable of pretending to be the alpha gorilla). I'm wondering if his supposed anonymous NSA consultants credited in the preface were just teenage pranksters. In any case, Mr. Brown has no more clue about how government bodies work than about cryptography, or just about anything (including chemistry ("poisonous silicon smoke!"), history, geography, languages, or, well, computers). Especially jarring are his incessant slurs about Electronic Frontier Foundation. Just becaue of those, Mr. Brown got my nomination for the title of jerk of the month. The whole book reads like a storyboard for a bad Hollywood movie; so I'm confident he is going to bag a movie deal - this book is a perfect match for their disdain of the intelligence of their audience. Add one to the pile of cinematic crap. My advice - save the time and money. This book is pure undiluted junk by an inept Eco or Stephenson wannabe. Well, unless you are looking for the printed equivalent of Plan 9 from Outer Space.
Rating: 
Summary: Not nearly as good as DaVinci Code
Review: After reading (and being delighted with) The DaVinci Code, I picked this one up. I was slightly disappointed with it. The characters were not that well-developed, the plot was slightly unbelivable, and the ending was completely ridiculous. If you're looking for an entertaining read that isn't very deep I'd recommend this. It's written okay but with very little research. However, if you are looking for the mental stimulation and excitement of the DaVinci code skip this one.
Rating:
Summary: Inconsistant, unbelievable characters
Review: The story would be better if the characters were consistant and believable. I didn't like the development of characters Susan or her boss, Strathmore (two of the main characters). Susan, supposedly a strong and intelligent woman as well as highly respected in the NSA, becomes a weak idiot when faced with a crisis? She and Strathmore are inconsistant in their words and behavior and that ruins the book. Strathmore, also highly respected in the NSA (Susan's boss) supposedly is extremely intelligent, at the top of the NSA hierachy, and has a secret crush on Susan and thus is allowing his marriage of thirty years to dissolve? Susan has NO IDEA about this until she becomes involved in this current crisis. Strathmore sends David, Susan's love, on a mission hoping he is killed so they can be together? His secret password is "Susan"? Pleeeaaase! Also Susan, a professional, intelligent, strong, respected, secure woman becomes a sniveling air-head when her boyfriend has to leave on an important mission and disrupts their romantic weekend plans. UGH! Stupid ideas and inconsistant character traits. If the characters were more realistic and believable the story could have been excellent. But as it is, the story is only good. I read this after "DaVinci code" and was disappointed. At least Dan Brown has gotten better -- I though DaVinci Code was excellent.
Rating:
Summary: Too Many Little Things
Review: First, let me say that I have read Dan Brown before and enjoyed it greatly. The first book I read of his was The Da Vinci Code, which was an excellent book. I appreciated Angels and Demons as well. However, this book was a major let down when I read it. The other books of his focused much less on technology although there was certainly some. However, it seems that he never really had a grasp on it. Technology is the source of most of the flaws in the book. A few of the flaws include the fact that it is impossible to send a program through text mail, which ARA forwarding undoubtedly entails in the book, bits are not the same as bytes, although Brown misses this fact on occasion, and I found no mention of rotating cleartext, a major facet of the book, when I searched the Internet, and I believe it is probably made up completely. I would have let all that go though and given it 4 stars, except that there are non-technical errors as well. For example, on one equation he refers to bacterial viruses, although that is a contradiction. At another point he says gold is durable, when it is actually a very soft metal. There are other issues, and they really add up and start to get on your nerves. Some of the plot in the book really isn't reasonable either. Why are the members of the NSA soooo stupid at times. Don't they have a 170 I.Q.? Why is there a deaf assasin? For these reasons, and others, I heartily recommend an alternate Dan Brown read.
Rating:
Summary: Good story, poor attention to detail......
Review: A better than average plot, well paced and plotted, but let down by many niggling details. The author likes to include technical and engineering detail but lacks the knowledge to make them credible. We hear about welded ceramic casings, a bus driver "downshifting" from 1st gear, to 2nd gear, a computer with 3 million hand soldered processor chips, designed, built and tested in half a million man hours (that is some fast soldering!) Password protected screensavers are introduced as if they are a new invention only used in government circles. Also, there are way too many plot status reminders. Every other page you are reminded why an event is significant (as if you have the attention span of a goldfish). My one plot complaint was that the Spanish goose chase for a key just seems to go an and on and on (and on and on) until I really didn't care what happened next as long as it finished soon.
Rating:
Summary: Good openning stage, bad climatic ending.
Review: I am starting to doubt the reviews I read online now. I bought the book because of the reviews. Anyways, the book had good first half. Here the author did ok job introducing the plot and the characters, but after everything else fell like to crumbles. I agree with the other reviewer, who said that the characters were so unreal. I mean lets face it, if stuff that happens on the book did actually happen nobody would be skeptical about the problems. Even a false alarm in an org. like NSA, they check it. I wanted to stop reading, but like the habit I have to finish what I started I had to read to end. Then the end was something to make you wanna throw the book in the fireplace (hey at least is useful for this winter) or sell it back. Anyways, don't take my review into account. Make your own judgement, but before go to your store and flip to the pages b4 buying.
Rating:
Summary: popcorn book
Review: Great read...it is like a popcorn movie: fast-paced, fun, interesting and ultimately forgetable. It will keep you on the edge of you seat. With the ultra short chapters, this book is paced like a movie and will be a quick read for most of you. the definition of a page-turner.
| 
