Incarnations: Three Plays

Rating:
Summary: One Astonishing Play, One Good, One Unsuccessful
Review: A few years ago, I picked up a copy of PANDEMONIUM, a softcover overview of Clive Barker's works. While I found most of the material interesting, what blew me away was the first ever printing of Barker's THE HISTORY OF THE DEVIL. Quite simply, it is one of the best plays I have ever read. It is demanding, thought-provoking, funny, obscene, and brilliant.

HISTORY is centred around the trial of the Devil. It is not so much a criminal proceeding, than it is an evaluation of his works on Earth. If he wins, he may re-enter Heaven. And as his history is re-enacted on stage, lawyers both for and against his case struggle to find a legal way to keep him where he belongs.

As in most of Barker's works, a simple description doesn't do it justice. HISTORY is an amazingly theatrical experience, all rooted in one of the most intriguing views of the Devil that I have read. While not being familiar with the more classical works of Dante and Milton, I can say that Barker's Devil is a far more satisfying and frightening figure than the demon presented in Anne Rice's MEMNOCH THE DEVIL. The play also presents one of the most original and shocking endings I have ever read, in a play or a novel.

The other two plays presented in INCANTATIONS are a mixed bag. FRANKENSTEIN IN LOVE is the more satisfying of the two. In a re-imagining of Mary Shelley's work, FRANKENSTEIN occurs in third world dictatorship, full of chaos and mystery. If I am not as enthusiastic as I am about HISTORY, it is that Barker's ideas in FRANKENSTEIN don't wholly combine. It has humour, horror, an astonishing amount of gore (I don't know HOW this would ever be staged), but by the end, the horror has taken over the story. It leaves you wishing for more of a coherent ending. Still, some scenes do remain in the mind, especially the scenes involving the dead, but still animated narrator.

Barker's third play, COLOSSUS, is the least of the three. Ostensibly, it surrounds the Spanish painter Goya, as he stumbles around after a tremendous bombing has destroyed a large portion of an estate. As I don't know anything of Goya, I can't speak as to the effectiveness of the sets in bringing out the mood of his paintings, as Barker suggests. But the play doesn't hold water. It is a amalgamation of confusing characters and odd dialogue. It has an unfinished feel to it. As this was one of Barker's earlier works, perhaps he can be forgiven it biting off more than he can figuratively chew. But as a published work, it functions as a curiosity, not a fully-formed play.

Still, Barker is one of the more interesting writers around. He's always willing to try and push the envelope, instead of resting on his laurels (anyone read Dean Koontz lately?). Read FRANKENSTEIN IN LOVE and COLOSSUS for the ideas. Read THE HISTORY OF THE DEVIL for the experience. It really is that good.

Rating:
Summary: One Astonishing Play, One Good, One Unsuccessful
Review: A few years ago, I picked up a copy of PANDEMONIUM, a softcover overview of Clive Barker's works. While I found most of the material interesting, what blew me away was the first ever printing of Barker's THE HISTORY OF THE DEVIL. Quite simply, it is one of the best plays I have ever read. It is demanding, thought-provoking, funny, obscene, and brilliant.

HISTORY is centred around the trial of the Devil. It is not so much a criminal proceeding, than it is an evaluation of his works on Earth. If he wins, he may re-enter Heaven. And as his history is re-enacted on stage, lawyers both for and against his case struggle to find a legal way to keep him where he belongs.

As in most of Barker's works, a simple description doesn't do it justice. HISTORY is an amazingly theatrical experience, all rooted in one of the most intriguing views of the Devil that I have read. While not being familiar with the more classical works of Dante and Milton, I can say that Barker's Devil is a far more satisfying and frightening figure than the demon presented in Anne Rice's MEMNOCH THE DEVIL. The play also presents one of the most original and shocking endings I have ever read, in a play or a novel.

The other two plays presented in INCANTATIONS are a mixed bag. FRANKENSTEIN IN LOVE is the more satisfying of the two. In a re-imagining of Mary Shelley's work, FRANKENSTEIN occurs in third world dictatorship, full of chaos and mystery. If I am not as enthusiastic as I am about HISTORY, it is that Barker's ideas in FRANKENSTEIN don't wholly combine. It has humour, horror, an astonishing amount of gore (I don't know HOW this would ever be staged), but by the end, the horror has taken over the story. It leaves you wishing for more of a coherent ending. Still, some scenes do remain in the mind, especially the scenes involving the dead, but still animated narrator.

Barker's third play, COLOSSUS, is the least of the three. Ostensibly, it surrounds the Spanish painter Goya, as he stumbles around after a tremendous bombing has destroyed a large portion of an estate. As I don't know anything of Goya, I can't speak as to the effectiveness of the sets in bringing out the mood of his paintings, as Barker suggests. But the play doesn't hold water. It is a amalgamation of confusing characters and odd dialogue. It has an unfinished feel to it. As this was one of Barker's earlier works, perhaps he can be forgiven it biting off more than he can figuratively chew. But as a published work, it functions as a curiosity, not a fully-formed play.

Still, Barker is one of the more interesting writers around. He's always willing to try and push the envelope, instead of resting on his laurels (anyone read Dean Koontz lately?). Read FRANKENSTEIN IN LOVE and COLOSSUS for the ideas. Read THE HISTORY OF THE DEVIL for the experience. It really is that good.

Rating:
Summary: Meet the devil
Review: Arguably the best play of this collection is The History of the Devil. Where the other two plays are a nice potent dip into the macabre, the Devil is a mind-blowing experience that gets you where it hurts the most: your conscience. What is evil? What is good? Can we judge anything? It isn't surprising that even Dante has a cameo role in this play.

I would love to see this play in production somewhere near me. Although it would not be as visually appealing as the other two plays in Incarnations, since it lacks scenes of cannibalism and dismemberment for instance, it surely must be a wonderful experience to see the actual Devil on stage.

Nice to know is that the actor that gave live to the Devil in the World Premiere of The History of the Devil as presented by the Dog Company at The York and Albany Theatre, London, in 1979 was none other than Doug Bradley, the guy that plays Pinhead in the famous Hellraiser movies.

As a conclusion I can reveal that the end of the play as a very nice twist to it. This collection shows Clive barker at his best. A must read for all fans of the macabre.

Rating:
Summary: History of the Devil is the best
Review: I wasn't really familiar with Clive Barker's work, and it struck me as an odd bet that this play would work for the stage, but i became so engrossed with the vivid characters, the incredible imagery, and the intensity of the vision itself, we decided that History of the Devil would be perfect to put on as the 1998 student-directed play at my highschool. Thank you, Clive Barker, this should be an excellent, fun production, and I encourage anyone to become entangled by these absorbing plays, as I was.

Rating:
Summary: Into the mind of genius
Review: In the realm of books filled with a play (or plays) this one is a real delight. Barker always satisfies in drawing the reader into highly imaginative realms of mythology, psychology and suspense - with wonderful surprises along the way.

If you are in the mood for a handful of soul stirring plays, I recommend this one along with The Walls Came Tumbling Down by Wilson.

My only complaint is that Barker's usually intriguing forwards sometimes give too much away, akin to a reviewer who provides just a tad too much insight. However, one could save the forward for after the plays.

Barker is a literary genius who spins the most amazing stories. To visualize them as theatrical releases on the stage is very intriguing.

Great work.

Rating:
Summary: It Just Dosn't Get Any Better.
Review: This book of plays was one of the best I have ever read. My fav of the three was Frankenstein in Love. The monolouges by Maria were superb and amasing. Her monolouges made me want to put the play on myself. Colossus was a little harder to get into but it was well worth it. In The History of The Devil speaks for itself. In all three plays the wrighting is some of Clive's best. It's well worth the effort to find this out of print book and keep it for a life time.