<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Read the truth first...
Review: This short volume spends a good deal of its space on the BACKGROUND and DEVELOPMENT (including missile technology) of WMD since the end of WW2. I suppose this makes sense since one can easily find fairly reliable info on CURRENT ARSENALS from the internet (the "Nuclear Notebook" of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists immediately comes to mind). This sort of data change all the time.One figure from this book strikes me: Britain's total nuclear arsenal - all in SLBM's - have a combined yield of just 19 MT. (p. 122) Compare this with China's total: 530 MT. (p. 124) However, one must keep in mind the high-survivability of a first strike of the former, something China still lags behind. China has no SSBM's in operation, according to Hutchinson. (This is well known.) How can China see itself as a superpower? And to think some Americans see China as a future threat! The following are chapter headings: 1. Dr Strangelove Lives! 2. Thunder from the Sky 3. Dawn of Deterrence 4. A Terrible Mushroom Cloud 5. Delivering the Hand of God 6. Missile Proliferation 7. The Last Ditch Defence 8. Awakening from the Nuclear Nightmare 9. Man's Inhumanity to Man - Chemical Weapons 10. Unlocking Pandora's Box - Biological Weapons Glossary Bibliography This book has no appendixes. (Worse it lacks an index - something I consider essential in any book of this type.) This book's emphasis seems to be on nuclear rather than chem or bio weapons. For those who enjoy a HISTORICAL tour of WMD, this book is standard fare. For those who are interested in the technical description of WMD (i.e., info that are de-classified and thus available to the public), you'd do well to look elsewhere. As for the author's credentials, I take his competence for granted since he comes from Jane's. Overall, interesting and useful.
Rating: 
Summary: Interesting & Useful
Review: This short volume spends a good deal of its space on the BACKGROUND and DEVELOPMENT (including missile technology) of WMD since the end of WW2. I suppose this makes sense since one can easily find fairly reliable info on CURRENT ARSENALS from the internet (the "Nuclear Notebook" of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists immediately comes to mind). This sort of data change all the time. One figure from this book strikes me: Britain's total nuclear arsenal - all in SLBM's - have a combined yield of just 19 MT. (p. 122) Compare this with China's total: 530 MT. (p. 124) However, one must keep in mind the high-survivability of a first strike of the former, something China still lags behind. China has no SSBM's in operation, according to Hutchinson. (This is well known.) How can China see itself as a superpower? And to think some Americans see China as a future threat! The following are chapter headings: 1. Dr Strangelove Lives! 2. Thunder from the Sky 3. Dawn of Deterrence 4. A Terrible Mushroom Cloud 5. Delivering the Hand of God 6. Missile Proliferation 7. The Last Ditch Defence 8. Awakening from the Nuclear Nightmare 9. Man's Inhumanity to Man - Chemical Weapons 10. Unlocking Pandora's Box - Biological Weapons Glossary Bibliography This book has no appendixes. (Worse it lacks an index - something I consider essential in any book of this type.) This book's emphasis seems to be on nuclear rather than chem or bio weapons. For those who enjoy a HISTORICAL tour of WMD, this book is standard fare. For those who are interested in the technical description of WMD (i.e., info that are de-classified and thus available to the public), you'd do well to look elsewhere. As for the author's credentials, I take his competence for granted since he comes from Jane's. Overall, interesting and useful.
Rating:
Summary: Read the truth first...
Review: Weapons of Mass Deception: The Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War on Iraq -- by Sheldon Rampton, John C. Stauber; Paperback Enough said... Don't wait until the media whites out this book completely...THEY are as responsible for the many lies. Of course there are truths, but we need to be informed of what was fabricated and what was not. This is extremely helpful and was promoted by NPR recently.
<< 1 >>
| 
