<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: An insightful and groundbreaking scholarly monograph
Review: Imagine this: You're Alexander the Great, setting out on campaign with your mighty army. Glory and profit await you if you succeed, and as you know from history, the real Alexander did succeed. His army was renowned for its efficiency, speed and lethality; his expedition through Asia was the longest military campaign ever undertaken; he fascinates military historians to this day. But when you put yourself in his place, ask yourself what was required of Alexander to realize his achievment. Was his fame won through superior force of men and arms alone? Could he take his army anywhere he desired, at any time? Had he merely to set his stern, clear gaze upon a point on the horizon and say: "There we shall go"--or was there more to it? Start with a mundane consideration: how do you feed your men? It's not as clear-cut as it might seem. Suppose you have an army of 10,000 men. Suppose, further, that each man's consumption rate is 3 pounds of grain per day's march. Now realize that this must mean just what the numbers tell you: each man of your 10,000 needs 3 pounds of grain daily, 3 times 10,000 is 30,000--so you need an incredible 30,000 pounds of food, each and every day. If you don't get this food, your men will weaken and die. There's no way around it. A quarter million pounds of food over the course of a week's march isn't easy to come by, especially in Alexander's day, is it? After all, you can't have the food airlifted to you. You have no motorized vehicles to speed you along, either, bear in mind. Your own feet must take you, slowly and over rough terrain in hot weather, to your destination. If and when you reach and conquer a town, its food stores become yours; but such settlements are few and far between, and practice subsistence level agriculture, in any case. Do your men carry all their food provisions with them? Food isn't all that your men must carry, and a man's back can only bear so much. Do you use pack animals? They have their own food requirements, which are greater than a man's, and in less time than you'd think they will eat what they haul. The fact is that waging war is never merely about raising an army and fighting an enemy; it's also about getting to the enemy without dying of dehydration and malnourishment along the way. How Alexander surmounted such problems of logistics--the supplying and transporting of his army--is the subject of Engels's fine book. With rigorous scholarship, utilizing sources both ancient and modern, including the most recent geographical and archaeological data, Engels shows that logistical concerns conditioned Alexander's every choice of strategy and tactics, timing and direction, necessitating the most careful, long-range planning. As Engels states, "a military route is not a mere line drawn on a map but a narrow corridor with sufficient agricultural and water resources in the immediate vicinity with which large numbers of men and animals can be supported." This is a fact of military planning of which Alexander had to be constantly aware. Engels does an excellent job in explaining it, and makes the subject of logistics much more interesting than I would have thought possible. This book is a much-needed corrective to earlier studies of Alexander the Great that oversimplify this aspect of his generalship of the Macedonian army.
Rating:
Summary: An unparalleled study in military logistics
Review: Despite the somewhat obscure title, this is a great read. Engels traces the journey of Alexander and his army across Asia and, using mostly quantitative analysis, explains how they managed to keep themselves fed through it all. In some cases, as in the Gedrosian desert, they didn't -- with devastating results. I've read many books on Alexander but this offers a fresh perspective, explaining not only what happened but why it happened. If only more history were written this way.
Rating:
Summary: A new approach
Review: Engals' work is important for any Alexander historian, and the interested layperson will find it accessible (it helps to have read Arrian or at least one bio of Alexander first-- maybe two, one each by an Alexander-hater and an Alexander-apologist!). I give this book five stars for its innovative, quantatative, approach. It's not perfect by any means, but it's a noble effort and despite what our Italian friend thinks, the scholarship is reasonably solid. Most important: it presents a picture of Alexander not as a starry-eyed dreamer filled with immensurable pathos (pace Peter Green, I DO like his biography) but a careful planner, who thoroughly understood the grim business of warfare down to its least dramatic aspect, supply and logistics.
Rating:
Summary: Still relevant!
Review: In addition to the historical importance of this book, well noted by other reviewers, it is useful to military planners even today, and is already in the personal libraries of some; it should be more widely read. Logistics problems today, of course, are very different from those of Alexander's time, but some constant factors remain. Throughout the areas conquered by Alexander (and some from which he turned back), difficult terrain, predictable drought, severe winter weather, timing of annual floods, blocking of routes by ice and snow, fertile and infertile areas, and other such, have changed somewhat, but not all that much, since the time of Alexander. Alexander solved these problems quite differently from the way a modern army solves them, but solved they must be by any army campaigning anywhere in this whole vast area, and many of Alexander's solutions offer clues to what will be feasible or infeasible solutions today. So this book is as useful to a modern military planner as to a historian.
Rating:
Summary: Logistics, can't live or win without it.
Review: Logistics, probably one of least glorious part of military history get its just rewards in this short but superbly written book which in clear and determined way, showed why Alexander the Great earned that coin, "the Great". The book showed us nicely how well organized the logistic system of the Macedonian Army was and the hand of Alexander was everywhere.
But the lesson the book shows also reflects the reality of today as well. Even this modern age, how well a military forces performed in combat reflects directly on how well that military forces is supported logistically.
A mandatory reading material for any military historian and just about any professional soldiers out there.
Rating:
Summary: Alexander needed this book
Review: This book is something that I haven't seen written for hardly any military time period, let alone Alexander's. A very excellent treatment on a subject that is normally difficult to find 'facts' about.
Rating:
Summary: VERY interesting and VERY detailed.
Review: This book is very important. Supply and logisitics are VERY important to any military history and here it is! The book starts out with a general chapter on the Macedonian army and its logistic system (such as how much food the army needed, the time needed to rest and feed the animals, how fast it moved and the methods that could be used to deliver and transport such supplies needed by the men and animals). The other chapters deal with each region, for example Chapter 2 deals with how the system worked in Greece and Turkey, based on archaeological work done in Asia, careful study of the landscape, climate and the military operations carried out by Alexander. The Appendixs deal with such subjects such as rations and routes taken by the army. Along with 16 maps in the end, the tiny book, only about 194 pages long, is STUFFED full of data. It is a must for any fan of Alexander the Great or anybody into military history. A great book to read along with J.F.C. Fuller's 'The Generalship of Alexander the Great'.
Rating:
Summary: Ground Breaking
Review: This is a very short yet it is a very good book. The reputation of Alexander the Great as a military commander has never been in doubt. However this book explains just how great he was. Most treatments of his campaigns focus on the key battles and his use of the phalanx and cavlary to achieve victory. However Engels makes the point that the conquest of Persia was a potentially very difficult campaign. Generals such as Crassus, Antony and Julian were to fail despite having large well disicplined armies. Engles shows that to maintain an army in the field in ancient times was difficult. Armies consumed food and water at a prodigous rate and all land transport was ineffecient. The remote location of Persia combined with its arid agriculture over time were its greatest protection. Alexander had to think carefully about every stage of his campaign so that he could obtain food and keep is army in the field. The key to this was initially water transport. Ships were the one effecient means of transport in the ancient world. Persia however at the time of Alexander had a large navy. Alexander calculated every move to perfection.Firstly he made his own men carry their equipment rather than using servants or camp followers as was the norm with Greek armies. This made his army quick moving and lessened the mouths to feed. He then started his campaign before the Persians could use thier harvest to provision a fleet. Alexander was able to move his army through Anatolia siezing all the Persian ports and to put their navy out of buisness. He was then able to use his navy to supply his forces. This book is masterful in explaining the campaign and it reveals the depth of Alexanders genius and the care of his planning. Invaluable for anyone interested in the area.
<< 1 >>
| 
