Hippocrates (Medicine and Culture)

Rating:
Summary: Mistake on Website
Review: Just to reiterate the point, the review above is for a book on Hippocrates by Jaques Jouanna. It only references the Loeb book in its critique, and was probably attahced to this Loeb page by accident. The Loeb books on Hippocrates come in several volumes.

Rating:
Summary: Mistake on Website
Review: Just to reiterate the point, the review above is for a book on Hippocrates by Jaques Jouanna. It only references the Loeb book in its critique, and was probably attahced to this Loeb page by accident. The Loeb books on Hippocrates come in several volumes.

Rating:
Summary: Writer of previous review need to re-read the review, above.
Review: table of contents and editor review are of Jouanna's book on hippocrates not the Loeb Library No 482. it appears under Jouanna's book also

Rating:
Summary: you've attached your book info to the wrong book
Review: table of contents and editor review are of Jouanna's book on hippocrates not the Loeb Library No 482. it appears under Jouanna's book also

Rating:
Summary: Web design confusion of 2 books into one title under Loeb
Review: The expert of Amazon may have confused of 2 differnt books into one title under the name of Hippocrates Loeb Classical.

Only the hard cover link may be right in selling and showing the image of Loeb Classical Volume VIII:

Hippocrates (Loeb Classical Library, No 482)
by Paul Potter

Links of image, paperback, and customer reviews are all on the different book of:

Hippocrates (Medicine and Culture)
by Jacques Jouanna, M. B. Debevoise
Paperback: 540 pages
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press; Reprint edition (December 1, 2001)
ISBN: 0801868181

Contents of book on Hippocrates is as good as book "by" Hippocrates. But the web design is confusing to customers. How can we buy each great 8 volumes of Hippocrates Loeb Classical, and choose out books "on" Hippocrates like this?

Rating:
Summary: Writer of previous review need to re-read the review, above.
Review: The previous review writer seems to have misunderstood the review presented above. The review, in fact, DOES allude to Jouanna's text. The Loeb version is merely discussed in Jouanna's text in the "Notes" section.