Cromwell

Rating:
Summary: Very superficial
Review: A lumbering biography of Oliver Cromwell - strange because I got no real feel for or understanding of Cromwell the man. Fraser does not get around to any kind of assessment of Cromwell as real human figure until a few pages before the end of the book, following the grisly details of what happened at the Restoration.

Much of the book reads as a general history of the Civil War, the Commonwealth and the Protectorate. Although Cromwell is of course a major figure throughout, there is little real focus on him in this book - no attempt to analyse his role, to put it in context and to ask what motivated him and what his real impact was. Rather, the book is closer to a hagiography than a biography.

For example, I was astounded that (in my edition), I got to page 87 and the narrative had already reached the year 1642. Cromwell was by then 43. Yet there was precious little to tell me why Cromwell had decided upon taking arms against Charles I. Lack of specific data may be an excuse, but surely this is a fundamental question for a biographer to ask and at least present an hypothesis to the reader. It is crucial to understanding Cromwell and to understanding the causes of the English Civil War.

The book is a long, and at times exhausting, plod of a read - a welter of facts strung together into a narrative. Fine if you're looking for a superficial canter through this (very important) phase of English history, but deeply frustrating if you're seeking a closer understanding.

Rating:
Summary: Yet another attempted read from Fraser
Review: As an Irish woman, I have hated Cromwell since early adolescence, yet never quite knew the history as to why, other than the fact that it was just what I should do. I felt the opinion incomplete and unfounded, as well as impossible to defend and when I came upon this book, chose to give it a read and discover for myself if in fact I hated him with purpose and full knowledge, or just blind adherence to a certain unspoken code. And after giving up two chapters into the book, I realized the truth behind my searching, hate is the correct emotion, only it is now directed at the author, Antonia Fraser.
I do not disrespect due to her opinion, which from the very cover is subjective to the murderers cause, but from the sheer audacity she has, writing an enormous book compiling the crap she read elsewhere about a man whom I still know nothing about.

Rating:
Summary: Detailed, pro-Cromwell, and a bit too long
Review: Cromwell is perhaps the single most controversial figure in English history. Only John and Richard III have attracted as much venom as he has, and there are still people alive today who hate him -- see some of the other reviews here for at least one example. Naturally the truth is complicated, and Fraser lays out a good deal of detail in support of her case, which is that Cromwell was much maligned, and was on the whole a good and religious man trying hard to do what he thought was right.

I had no prior belief about Cromwell, but I have to say Fraser convinced me rather of the opposite -- that he was a religious fanatic, brilliant but limited, who was neither a great ruler nor personally very admirable. Her apologies for some of his worst sins, such as the terrible events in Ireland, are outlandish.

On the plus side, this is a thorough and detailed book, with enough information to allow a reader to make up their own mind. Fraser does at least keep the facts separate from her opinions. The book is excellent on Cromwell himself; it's pretty good on details of the Civil Wars, though it doesn't go to the level that an exclusively military history might. However, it's surprisingly weak on the overall political background. To truly understand Cromwell you need to know what came before and after. I would have liked to see more about the religious state of the country, and why it got that way, and also about the Revolution of only thirty years after his death. But in concentrating on Cromwell the man (at perhaps too great a length), Fraser has skimped on the surrounding politics.

Overall, I'd recommend this only if you're deeply interested in knowing a lot about Cromwell's life, or if you already know the political and religious framework of the years 1640-1660. If you know both, this is a fine book (allowing for Fraser's open bias) but it's no place to start.

One other note: the paperback edition (which is what I have) does not have any of the photographs or other plates that are apparently in the hardback -- Fraser makes occasional reference to "the plate opposite page 709" and so on, so I would bear that in mind in choosing between the two editions.

Rating:
Summary: Detailed, pro-Cromwell, and a bit too long
Review: Cromwell is perhaps the single most controversial figure in English history. Only John and Richard III have attracted as much venom as he has, and there are still people alive today who hate him -- see some of the other reviews here for at least one example. Naturally the truth is complicated, and Fraser lays out a good deal of detail in support of her case, which is that Cromwell was much maligned, and was on the whole a good and religious man trying hard to do what he thought was right.

I had no prior belief about Cromwell, but I have to say Fraser convinced me rather of the opposite -- that he was a religious fanatic, brilliant but limited, who was neither a great ruler nor personally very admirable. Her apologies for some of his worst sins, such as the terrible events in Ireland, are outlandish.

On the plus side, this is a thorough and detailed book, with enough information to allow a reader to make up their own mind. Fraser does at least keep the facts separate from her opinions. The book is excellent on Cromwell himself; it's pretty good on details of the Civil Wars, though it doesn't go to the level that an exclusively military history might. However, it's surprisingly weak on the overall political background. To truly understand Cromwell you need to know what came before and after. I would have liked to see more about the religious state of the country, and why it got that way, and also about the Revolution of only thirty years after his death. But in concentrating on Cromwell the man (at perhaps too great a length), Fraser has skimped on the surrounding politics.

Overall, I'd recommend this only if you're deeply interested in knowing a lot about Cromwell's life, or if you already know the political and religious framework of the years 1640-1660. If you know both, this is a fine book (allowing for Fraser's open bias) but it's no place to start.

One other note: the paperback edition (which is what I have) does not have any of the photographs or other plates that are apparently in the hardback -- Fraser makes occasional reference to "the plate opposite page 709" and so on, so I would bear that in mind in choosing between the two editions.

Rating:
Summary: A little too pro-Cromwell, but OK
Review: Having read Antonia Fraser's Mary Queen of Scots which I liked for one reason because she was favorable to Mary, I was a little surprised to see how defensive Antonia Fraser was of Cromwell in this carefully written and very adequate biography. But except for that defensiveness, this is a good book, capped by the astounding information which she gives of what happened to Cromwell's body after Charles II came back to England. That account alone makes the book worth reading. I suspect I will never again note September 3 as memorable only because Engkand abnd France declared war on Hitler on that date. Cromwell won two of his greatest victories and died on that date as well. (Though that was, I presume, old calendar). I have been meaning to read this book for over 20 years and I am glad I finally did.

Rating:
Summary: Oliver Cromwell in detail
Review: I don't know much about the English Civil War. I do know a fair bit about military history (having read a lot of it over the past 25 years) and so I somehow came into possession of a second-hand copy of Antonia Fraser's biography of Oliver Cromwell. This is a well-written, thorough (perhaps a bit too thorough) biography of a fascinating, very deeply religious man and successful soldier.

The author backgrounds Cromwell reasonably well, given that sources for his early life are presumably scarce, but the heart of the book (after the first 90 pages or so) is his military and political career. He started this as a Member of Parliament, became a junior soldier (a captain to start), moved up through the ranks to the top of England's military, then reverted to politics as Lord Protector, and was even offered the crown as king just before he died. All of this last happened in the final sixteen or so years of his life: a very eventful period.

The book divides into three stages after the early life segment: subordinate commander in the Army, commander of the Army, and finally Lord Protector. The last is the longest, with much discussion in detail of English politics of the era, the wars they fought and why, and issues ranging from religious tolerance to the fate of Royalists who stayed in England when the King was executed and Parliament took on the reins of government. The military chapters are especially well done. Fraser isn't a military historian, but she exhibits a considerable grasp of the nature of battles and why things happen the way they do. The battles are covered in considerable detail, so that Cromwell's genius can be understood (he appears to be the only English general in history able to control that country's cavalry) and his impact fully appreciated. The political section of the book bogged down for me a bit, I suppose because the politics of those days hold little interest for me, and that section of the book is the longest. Nevertheless, I enjoyed the book greatly, and would recommend it.

Rating:
Summary: ****YAWN****
Review: This book is completely lifeless. This woman has no sense of humor, nor does she know how to tell a good story. There are also so many tedious details that will tend to put you in a comatose state. If someone actually knows of a decent Cromwell bio, please send me an e-mail, because this book was a bore and at times I wanted to quit reading it.

Rating:
Summary: Tedious and boring, full of superficial details
Review: This book was so incredibly boring, that I was tempted to skip parts of it. Some of the other criticisms leveled are true such as the fact that she completely skips his childhood.

She also is completely void of any humour or literary style in terms of presenting his life as an interesting story.
Instead, you are bombed with such trivial details about things that you wouldn't even get quizzed on Jeopardy about.
Avoid this book like SARS.

Rating:
Summary: A competent but lifeless biography
Review: This is a diligent & conscientious look at the life of Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658 AD) from his modest beginnings as a small landowner , his spiritual evolution into a devout (but self-rightous) Puritan to his election to the English parliament, followed by his role as the the chief protagonist in the English civil war in the 1640's which culminated in the beheading of Charles I (1649) . The events leading up to the dismissal of the "Rump" parliament in 1652 and the establishment of the protectorate (essentially Cromwell's dictatorship) are also narrated ably.All the important battles(Edgehill,Naseby etc) are sketched in detail .Antonia Fraser does a pretty good job collating and narrating all the major events in Cromwell's life but what's missing from this book is LIFE (incidentally the "bio" in biography stands for "life"!) .It is an OK history but a fairly mediocre biography .For instance Cromwell is widely regarded as the man who galvanised the energies of 17th century England (by getting rid of an effete monarch and massively building up the navy) effectively laying down the foundations of the subsequent British empire but this book gives the reader very little sense of that .Considering that Cromwell's contemporaries included figures like Cardinal Mazarin,Milton,William Harvey,Francis Bacon and the birth of Newton(1642 AD) this book does a fairly poor job of giving us a "feel" for the post Elizabethan England and the dynamic energy that must have characterised it ____a good biography being more than just a day to day narrative of the subject's life.This is quite a leaden and turgid book .I finished it more out of a sense of obligation than pure reading pleasure( it is more than 700 pages long!) . It is most definitely NOT a page turner!