Rating: 
Summary: Brilliant Social History of the "Gay Male World"
Review: I read a lot of history, but generally not read social history. Nevertheless, this is one of the best books I have read in recent years. According to Author George Chauncey, who teaches at the University of Chicago, a "myth of isolation" "holds that, even if a gay world existed [in New York between 1890 and 1940], it was kept invisible." Chauncey's main premise is that, not only was there a gay New York beginning in the 1890s, it was not invisible. In the marvelous introduction, Chauncey also makes the profound point that the gay male world of the pre-World War II era "was not a world in which men were divided into 'homosexuals' and 'heterosexuals.'" Chauncey proceeds to explain: "This book argues that in important respects the hetero-homosexual binarism, the sexual regime now hegemonic in American culture, is a stunningly recent creation." Later in the introduction, Chauncey writes: "Heterosexuality, no less than homosexuality, is a historically specific social category and identity." Chauncey's study begins in the 1890s, "a time when New York was famous for being a 'wide-open town,' [when] some clubs went so far as to stage live sexual performances." The so-called "Bowery resorts were only the most famous elements of an extensive, organized, highly visible gay world." At the turn of the century, men who were "'painted and powdered,' used women's names, and displayed feminine mannerisms" were called "fairies." According to Chauncey, fairies were tolerated, but not respected, in much of working-class society. During this period "Many men alternated between male and female sexual partners without believing that interest in one precluded interest in the other." Men, who "maintained a masculine demeanor and played...only the 'masculine,' or insertive role in the sexual encounter" were not considered to be "queer." According to Chauncey: "many workingmen knew precisely were to go to find fairies with whom, if they chose, they need not exchange a word to make their wishes clear." Chauncey explains: "Most commonly, gay men simply offered to perform certain sexual acts, especially fellation, which many straight men enjoyed but many women (even many prostitutes) were loath to perform." If the sexual landscape was fluid in turn-of-the-century working-class New York, a more rigid adherence to the regime of heterosexuality was emerging in middle-class culture. By the 1920s, according to Chauncey, "the style of the fairy was more likely to be adopted by younger men and poorer men who had relatively little at stake in the straight middle-class world, where the loss of respect the fairy style entailed could be costly indeed." Chauncey explains that, in the first two decades of the 20th century, "heterosexuality became more important to middle-class than working-class men" because of the growing belief that "anyone who engaged in homosexual activity was implicated as 'being' a homosexual." In Chauncey's view: "The insistence on exclusive heterosexuality emerged in part...in response to the [late-19th, early-20th century] crisis in middle-class masculinity....Middle-class men increasingly conceived of their sexuality - their heterosexuality, or exclusive desire for women - as one of the hallmarks of real men." According to Chauncey: "The association of the homosexual and the heterosexual with middle-class culture highlights the degree to which 'sexuality' and the rooting of gender in anatomy were bourgeois productions," which explains why Chauncey asserts that the rigid heterosexual-homosexual dichotomy is a recent creation. This is historical exposition and analysis at its very best Middle-class sensibilities also were at the center of efforts, beginning early in the 20th century, to police, if not suppress, the "city of bachelors." According to Chauncey: "The city was a logical destination for men intent on freeing themselves from the constraints of the family." In turn, according to Chauncey, middle-class reformers demonstrated a growing anxiety about the threat to the social order posed by men and women who seemed to stand outside the family." According to Chauncey, "World War I was a watershed in the history of the urban moral reform movement" because the war "embodied reformers' darkest fears and their greatest hopes, for it threatened the very foundations of the nation's moral order - the family, small-town stability, the racial and gender hierarchy." The streets of New York "were filled with soldiers and sailors," as a result of which, according to Chauncey, the war "threatened to expose hundreds of thousands of American boys from farms and small towns to the evil influences of the big city." Furthermore, as Chauncey puts it, although "[i]t is impossible to determine how many gay soldiers stayed in New York after the war,...it was, indeed, hard to keep them down on the farm after they've seen gay New York." There is much else about this book to admire. After Chauncey defines the boundaries of his study, he devotes several chapters to describing in fascinating detail the gay male world in New York between 1890 and 1940, from YMCAs and rooming houses to saloons and gay bars to the baths to assignation hotels. I am simply in awe of the research Chauncey did for his chapter entitled "'Privacy Could Only Be Had in Public': Forging a Gay World in the Streets," the sources for which include not only the predictable secondary materials but also letters, interviews, oral histories, and court files in the New York Municipal Archives. There also is a fine selection of photographs, cartoons, and other visual aids. The gay world in New York was tolerated by middle-class authorities as long as it did not spread to middle America or to threaten its values. During World War I, when thousands of young Americans in the military visited the city, the relatively open gay life there threatened to corrupt them, and that contributed to the creation of what Chauncey calls "police-state conditions," which evolved until they had firmly taken hold by 1940. I understand Chauncey currently is writing the history of gay New York from 1945 until 1975, and I await publication of that volume with great impatience.
Rating: 
Summary: Informative...YES...but quite wordy & redundant in parts
Review: I read this book over a matter of 6 days. I've had the book for about a year before I finally read it because I was into so many other books. Anyway, it's much to wordy and quite redundant in parts. It was extremely informational in a historical sense...I grant you that! It's worth reading for someone who wants to know 'what was' in the Gay New York world in the early part of the 20th Century. It's clear that homosexuality and heterosexuality are modern terms of the times and the idea that any 'one' person should be labeled one or the other is WRONG...everyone falls somewhere within the two opposite sides of the spectrum. I'd still recommend this book to any guy that has any bit of attraction for men...like I do. Some of my favorite lines: ...having two names emblematized their participation in a double life.----- At the turn of the century...a bisexual was not attracted to both males and females; a bisexual WAS both male and female.----- ...as one Italian teenager described the attitude of men at his neighborhood pool hall in 1930, the body to enter did not necessarily have to be a woman's.----- The fairy and the queer, not the medical profession, forced middle-class men to consider the possibilty of a sexual element in their relations with other men.----- GAY itself referred to female prostitutes before it referred to gay men;----- In the course of establishing a place for themselves in the city, gay men constantly had to struggle with the public and private agencies of social control, as well as with popular hostility.
Rating:
Summary: Informative...YES...but quite wordy & redundant in parts
Review: I read this book over a matter of 6 days. I've had the book for about a year before I finally read it because I was into so many other books. Anyway, it's much to wordy and quite redundant in parts. It was extremely informational in a historical sense...I grant you that! It's worth reading for someone who wants to know 'what was' in the Gay New York world in the early part of the 20th Century. It's clear that homosexuality and heterosexuality are modern terms of the times and the idea that any 'one' person should be labeled one or the other is WRONG...everyone falls somewhere within the two opposite sides of the spectrum. I'd still recommend this book to any guy that has any bit of attraction for men...like I do. Some of my favorite lines: ...having two names emblematized their participation in a double life.----- At the turn of the century...a bisexual was not attracted to both males and females; a bisexual WAS both male and female.----- ...as one Italian teenager described the attitude of men at his neighborhood pool hall in 1930, the body to enter did not necessarily have to be a woman's.----- The fairy and the queer, not the medical profession, forced middle-class men to consider the possibilty of a sexual element in their relations with other men.----- GAY itself referred to female prostitutes before it referred to gay men;----- In the course of establishing a place for themselves in the city, gay men constantly had to struggle with the public and private agencies of social control, as well as with popular hostility.
Rating:
Summary: Careful, convincing scholarship; an important contribution
Review: If you want to know who you are, it helps to know where you come from. Dr. Chauncy's book recognizes that the gay community didn't originate at Stonewall, and carefully explores the social forces which both allowed and limited sexual behavior between men in the early 20th century. His challenging new construction of gender and sexual identity in the early 20th century is very carefully crafted, his assertions are well documented, and he does not strain to make arguments his evidence will not sustain. The text, while appropriately academic, remains highly readable, and will interest those who recognize that who we are today is shaped, at least in part, by the dynamics of American urban culture 50-100 years ago
Rating:
Summary: Incredible Book!
Review: This book is fabulous. If I didn't take the class I'm taking, this is DEFINATELY a book I would read outside of it. It's full of facts and stories. The history in it reveals thing I never knew existed in the LGBT past. This sheds light on a lot of things in the community. GREAT BOOK!
Rating: 
Summary: A treasure chest of forgotten lore
Review: This book was preceded in my conciousness by high critical praise and so I approached it with great expectations. And in great part it met these expectations. More than anything else, this is a work of love, being the excavation of forgotten facts in the history of gay life as it was lived by decades of gay men, experiences now mostly forgotten or scattered in obscure and fading documents. It is an extraordinary work of social archeology, resurrecting a world I never knew exisited. And Chauncey does this in exceptional detail, using clear prose, so that by the end the geography of this world has been salvaged and reconstructed, like Combray from Marcel's teacup. As the book proceeds, the writing becomes stronger, particularly as the facts become more readily available, and the arguments and conclusions become more convincing. The last chapter is especially good on the submergence of gay life after Prohibition. This book is clearly one of the masterpieces of gay history, on par with John Boswell's work especially in it's dependence on primary sources. The only criticism I have lies in the fact that Chauncey often has trouble shaping his information and often can't create a forest out of the trees. Especially in the earlier chapters, he often fails to make a summary statement without such a host of qualifiers that you wonder why he bothers in the first place. And as a previous reviewer has noted, there are alot of repetitions that a good editor should have corrected. Despite all these reservations, for those interested in discovering a lost world, this book will be a revelation.
|
