<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Not for everyone, but very interesting...
Review: As the manager of several websites dealing with the fascination that many people -- both men and women -- have with gynecology, I was very much looking forward to reading this book, and I was not disappointed. The insight that Ms. Kapsalis brings to the subject, using both her scholarly studies and her actual experience in the field, gives her a very informed perspective on the unique dynamics inherent in this medical speciality. Her committment to women's health and the free flow of information from doctor to patient is commendable and really comes through.From the traditional world of gynecology to taboo-bending performance art, Ms. Kapsalis explores the attitudes and advances being made in the way we think about this intimate invasion of the female body. I would recommend this to anyone who wants to explore the psychological, sociological, psychosexual, and historical underpinnings of gynecology. Don't come here looking for stimulating pictures or cheap thrills -- this is a text-heavy serious book, but rewarding reading for those motivated and interested.
Rating: 
Summary: Wrong Emphasis
Review: Kapsalis took the right subject in the wrong direction. She missed an opportunity to attack gross negligence in the medical culture. Both men and women are victimized by a culture of unnecessary and invasive medical procedures.
There are pre-admission physicals, employment physicals, sports physicals, insurance physicals, immigration physicals, and on the job physicals but no proof that physicals save lives. Furthermore, some professions ie Nurse Practitioners and Certified Physician's Assistants almost subsist on doing physicals because older professions {DOs and MDs} protect their turf
Last but not least, she should have criticized Joan Emerson's research. Patients are protected by being covered up and treated objectively. How many patients want to be fully exposed with no chaperon?
Kapsalis also didn't mention Jack Olson's book "DOC: The Rape of the Town of Lovell" about convicted physician/rapist Dr. Story. Overall, Kapsalis didn't approach this subject from the best perspective
Rating:
Summary: Wrong Emphasis
Review: Kapsalis took the right subject in the wrong direction. She missed an opportunity to attack gross negligence in the medical culture. Both men and women are victimized by a culture of unnecessary and invasive medical procedures.
There are pre-admission physicals, employment physicals, sports physicals, insurance physicals, immigration physicals, and on the job physicals but no proof that physicals save lives. Furthermore, some professions ie Nurse Practitioners and Certified Physician's Assistants almost subsist on doing physicals because older professions {DOs and MDs} protect their turf
Last but not least, she should have criticized Joan Emerson's research. Patients are protected by being covered up and treated objectively. How many patients want to be fully exposed with no chaperon?
Kapsalis also didn't mention Jack Olson's book "DOC: The Rape of the Town of Lovell" about convicted physician/rapist Dr. Story. Overall, Kapsalis didn't approach this subject from the best perspective
Rating:
Summary: An interesting historical look at gynecology
Review: Starting with vivid descriptions of gynecology's roots in American slavery, the focus of the woman's body is set up as a theatre for men's enjoyment. The above section is desciptive enough to make a woman's insides turn in horror, as the mistreatment and unhygenic display of black slave women's reproductive systems is described in detail. Carrying this idea of gynecology as a theatre, Kapsalis introduces graphic photos of actual theatre performances of the use of the speculum. This shocking portrayal allows for the movement of gynecology and the acceptance of the woman's body that is paramount to the book's conclusion. Overall, an intersting read. Not five stars, as it is a bit slow in sections. Over emphasis on the "speculum play"...
<< 1 >>
| 
