Rating: 
Summary: Put the power of truth and reason on your side.
Review: Among all the self help books that I have read, this is on the short list of classics. What makes this book unique is that it focuses on the two things that can really help you; truth and reason. Ringer applies these to people, the world and everyday life. This is one of the few books that I've read that is refreshingly honest. The author pulls no punches and tells things the way they are. The book may be intimidating to some people because it is the raw truth and this can be frightening. It is best to face the truth because only in truth does one find power. Ringer begins by showing how perspective orients us to the world, and how people have differing perspectives. He shows why it is important to base your actions on truth and reason and why a failure to do so can lead to disaster. Some people may find truth unpleasent, but this really is a problem of perspective. What appears terrible may really be a blessing in disguise. One should not focus exclusivley on the negative but look at the positive side too. Bad experiences for instance can toughen you up, make you stronger and more self reliant. In one chapter on finance, Ringer gives his experiences about being left destitute, but he looked on the positive side-theres always a positive side, if you look hard enough- and used it to his advantage. If one wants to survive and do well in this world, he must arm himself with truth. This book does a splendid job in showing that.
Rating: 
Summary: Recommended with a few cautions
Review: As others -- including Ringer himself -- have said, this is NOT a book about disregarding the rights and feelings of everyone but yourself. In fact, according to the principles presented in the book, such disregard is ultimately self-defeating. This book IS about having a realistic understanding of what motivates everyone including yourself. Like it or not, people want to make the best deal they can make for themselves -- which means if you believe everyone has a moral/ethical obligation to respond to your needs, you'll constantly be disappointed, frustrated, hurt, and a prime target for every con artist with swamp land to sell. How many people do you know who are bitter and angry over life not giving them a better deal -- but who have never given anybody any reason to offer them one? Conversely, if you go through life determined to show everyone how totally selfless you are, you'll also constantly be disappointed, frustrated, hurt, and a prime target for every con artist with swamp land to sell. How many people do you know who are bitter and angry over all the "totally unselfish" things they've done that have gone unrecognized and unrewarded -- and who might be better off and better liked if they'd acknowledge the hidden price tag?I'm not trying to lecture you, but to present Ringer's message in the best light. One reason I've found his book useful is that I've been both of those people I mentioned above. But I'm not anxious to discuss my own imperfections, so back to the book. Ringer divides life into a series of "hurdles" that must be cleared in order to reach the "finish line" called success. The order in which these are presented may seem odd at first, but ultimately proves to make sense. For example, why put Friendship and Love after Finance, when many folks probably feel they'd like to take care of the basic human need for friendship and love first, then worry about finding gainful employment? Because of a basic rule that applies to all three situations, but is easiest to accept when seeking gainful employment -- that if you want someone to give you something of value, you have to offer them something of value. It makes more sense to introduce that rule in a context where the reader will accept it, then make the point that it applied in other areas where people don't expect it to. My only quibble with the order of presentation concerns the chapter on crusades, which seems a bit like an intrusion -- although, to be fair, I'm not sure where I'd have put it. And I feel the book has two other, bigger problems. First, it seems slanted toward men. This comes across partly in many of the examples, and partly in the coarseness of some of the language. Okay, so there are plenty of women out there who indulge in coarse language as well, but if you;re gonna publish a book, which is presumably aimed at the entire country, you gotta think of the big picture. Even if coarse language doesn't indicate gender bias, it indicates some kind of bias. The second, and more serious problem is that Ringer is essentially an articulate layman, which means that he (a) may not be qualified to make some of the statements he makes, and (b) lacks (or at least fails to demonstrate) an understanding of how his philosophy fits into the established body of ethical and psychological thought. The example of (a) that really jumped out at me was the statement that you shouldn't stay in a bad relationship because of children, since children will be worse off growing up with two unhappy parents than with a single parent. Intuitively, this makes sense, but I would act on it without consulting a few child psychologists and/or looking up the statistics. Regarding (b), Ringer appears first of all to be unaware that the ethical system of rational selfishness is one of three recognized systems. The other two are (1) do what's most beneficial to the greatest number of people, and (2) assume there is a set of absolute moral rules and do what they tell you. Ringer might have had more credibility of he'd acknowledge these systems and defended rational selfishness against them. But the real killer is that the assumption on which he bases the entire book has been shown to be flawed. This is the assumption that everybody seeks to act in his/her own best interest all the time, even when this appears not to be so. The flaw in that assumption lies in its apparent flawlessness. Every hypothetical situation you can dream up can be explained in terms of the assumption being true. One of Ringers examples is a man who goes to a flower show with his wife instead of doing something he'd rather do. This man is acting in his own best interest because he figures the pleasure he'd get from whatever he wanted to do is outweighed by the trouble he'll be in if he doesn't go to the flower show. Well, it turns out that because you can't devise a situation that would prove the assumption false, you can't devise a truly reliable test of its validity. Such a test consists of s situation in which there will definitely be one outcome if the assumption is true, and another outcome if the assumption is false. You can't set up such a situation if every possible outcome of every possible situation indicates that the assumption is true. But that doesn't make book is worthless. The problem I just pointed out occurs only if you read Ringer's statement as an unqualified, all encompassing assumption. If you soften it to something like "Most people should be expected to be motivated by self-interest most of the time," that's another story.
Rating:
Summary: Recommended with a few cautions
Review: As others -- including Ringer himself -- have said, this is NOT a book about disregarding the rights and feelings of everyone but yourself. In fact, according to the principles presented in the book, such disregard is ultimately self-defeating. This book IS about having a realistic understanding of what motivates everyone including yourself. Like it or not, people want to make the best deal they can make for themselves -- which means if you believe everyone has a moral/ethical obligation to respond to your needs, you'll constantly be disappointed, frustrated, hurt, and a prime target for every con artist with swamp land to sell. How many people do you know who are bitter and angry over life not giving them a better deal -- but who have never given anybody any reason to offer them one? Conversely, if you go through life determined to show everyone how totally selfless you are, you'll also constantly be disappointed, frustrated, hurt, and a prime target for every con artist with swamp land to sell. How many people do you know who are bitter and angry over all the "totally unselfish" things they've done that have gone unrecognized and unrewarded -- and who might be better off and better liked if they'd acknowledge the hidden price tag? I'm not trying to lecture you, but to present Ringer's message in the best light. One reason I've found his book useful is that I've been both of those people I mentioned above. But I'm not anxious to discuss my own imperfections, so back to the book. Ringer divides life into a series of "hurdles" that must be cleared in order to reach the "finish line" called success. The order in which these are presented may seem odd at first, but ultimately proves to make sense. For example, why put Friendship and Love after Finance, when many folks probably feel they'd like to take care of the basic human need for friendship and love first, then worry about finding gainful employment? Because of a basic rule that applies to all three situations, but is easiest to accept when seeking gainful employment -- that if you want someone to give you something of value, you have to offer them something of value. It makes more sense to introduce that rule in a context where the reader will accept it, then make the point that it applied in other areas where people don't expect it to. My only quibble with the order of presentation concerns the chapter on crusades, which seems a bit like an intrusion -- although, to be fair, I'm not sure where I'd have put it. And I feel the book has two other, bigger problems. First, it seems slanted toward men. This comes across partly in many of the examples, and partly in the coarseness of some of the language. Okay, so there are plenty of women out there who indulge in coarse language as well, but if you;re gonna publish a book, which is presumably aimed at the entire country, you gotta think of the big picture. Even if coarse language doesn't indicate gender bias, it indicates some kind of bias. The second, and more serious problem is that Ringer is essentially an articulate layman, which means that he (a) may not be qualified to make some of the statements he makes, and (b) lacks (or at least fails to demonstrate) an understanding of how his philosophy fits into the established body of ethical and psychological thought. The example of (a) that really jumped out at me was the statement that you shouldn't stay in a bad relationship because of children, since children will be worse off growing up with two unhappy parents than with a single parent. Intuitively, this makes sense, but I would act on it without consulting a few child psychologists and/or looking up the statistics. Regarding (b), Ringer appears first of all to be unaware that the ethical system of rational selfishness is one of three recognized systems. The other two are (1) do what's most beneficial to the greatest number of people, and (2) assume there is a set of absolute moral rules and do what they tell you. Ringer might have had more credibility of he'd acknowledge these systems and defended rational selfishness against them. But the real killer is that the assumption on which he bases the entire book has been shown to be flawed. This is the assumption that everybody seeks to act in his/her own best interest all the time, even when this appears not to be so. The flaw in that assumption lies in its apparent flawlessness. Every hypothetical situation you can dream up can be explained in terms of the assumption being true. One of Ringers examples is a man who goes to a flower show with his wife instead of doing something he'd rather do. This man is acting in his own best interest because he figures the pleasure he'd get from whatever he wanted to do is outweighed by the trouble he'll be in if he doesn't go to the flower show. Well, it turns out that because you can't devise a situation that would prove the assumption false, you can't devise a truly reliable test of its validity. Such a test consists of s situation in which there will definitely be one outcome if the assumption is true, and another outcome if the assumption is false. You can't set up such a situation if every possible outcome of every possible situation indicates that the assumption is true. But that doesn't make book is worthless. The problem I just pointed out occurs only if you read Ringer's statement as an unqualified, all encompassing assumption. If you soften it to something like "Most people should be expected to be motivated by self-interest most of the time," that's another story.
Rating:
Summary: Practical advice to enjoy life.
Review: Looking out for number 1 - in this book, Ringer gives you practical advice on making your life more enjoyable and avoiding pitfalls:
1. Thinking for yourself - why you should not to blindly accept the customs and traditions of society or the advice of experts. Reason and intellect vs. diplomas and degrees.
2. Governments - how governments can stand between you and achieving your goals.
3. Love - taking risks in love and winning.
Rating:
Summary: R.J. Ringer is truly # 1
Review: Ringer's book has literally changed my life. I often find myself thinking back to the words I had read, or flipping through pages of specific sections to remind me of his philosophies. Especially when I am dealing with difficult people. This book provided the words and methods on how to conduct oneself in order to fulfill whatever goals you set for yourself. I do NOT consider myself a follower of everything the book spews at me. And I don't particularly agree with EVERYTHING the book states either. The beauty of this publication is that you are always free to disagree with certain positions that Ringer takes, and yet still benefit from the rest of his literature. Anyone who I have encountered who dissed the book, I later end up finding out, never actually read it. The title does scare people away. Luckily it scares the "wrong" people away anyway. I strongly recommend this book to anyone who is struggling with the inner conflict of what they want or need to do for themselves vs. what they feel they should do. Although, slightly dated in its refrences, this book has undone years worth of damage I have suffered in the education system (I am about to start my second Masters degree) and has also given me the rational to deal with turbulant personalities, whether they be family, friends, or business associates. I bought this book for 33 1/3 cents in a used book store, and knowing now what it has offered me in the area of betterment in my life, I would gladly have paid 30 or 40 dollars. You simply can't make a better investment in a life altering book! Recently I was asked if I could meet anybody in the world, who would it be. I say it would be Ringer, for nothing more that to say thank-you for putting his thoughts in writing. Again, I stress that I absolutely do NOT agree with everything the man says, but I still have to give it my full thumbs up. And for me, thats says alot.
Rating:
Summary: A true business classic. One of a kind.
Review: Robert Ringer wrote 3 books that I have read and that were the start of the section of my library called "Business Classics" "Million Dollar Habbits" is brilliant, well rounded and has a lot of ideas that will make your participation in business more thrill and less danger.
"Winning Through Intimidation" teaches you how to use images and stories on yourself to make the proper preperation and careful execution of any job meaty and palletable.
"Looking Out For Number one" is Karate for the salesman or businessman. Great ethicle well written book.
Anytime a lecturer or author puts down one of Ringers books as being self serving or immoral you cab count on that person not having done their homework. Sort of an I.Q. test.
Add these books to your own business library. You'll read them more than once and they will save your fanny more than once.
After reading the review below by the gentelman from Australia
I have got this book out again because I see I missed some goog stuff. Ringer makes it so simple it's fun.
Rating:
Summary: A true business classic. One of a kind.
Review: Robert Ringer wrote 3 books that I have read and that were the start of the section of my library called "Business Classics" "Million Dollar Habbits" is brilliant, well rounded and has a lot of ideas that will make your participation in business more thrill and less danger.
"Winning Through Intimidation" teaches you how to use images and stories on yourself to make the proper preperation and careful execution of any job meaty and palletable.
"Looking Out For Number one" is Karate for the salesman or businessman. Great ethicle well written book.
Anytime a lecturer or author puts down one of Ringers books as being self serving or immoral you cab count on that person not having done their homework. Sort of an I.Q. test.
Add these books to your own business library. You'll read them more than once and they will save your fanny more than once.
After reading the review below by the gentelman from Australia
I have got this book out again because I see I missed some goog stuff. Ringer makes it so simple it's fun.
Rating:
Summary: A handy guide to rational and rewarding living!
Review: Some people might misinterpret the title of this book as`How To Screw People And Get Away With It',but nothing could be further from the truth! Robert shows how being an independent-thinking person who strives to fulfill his own rational self-interest not only leads to a more rewarding life but makes you less of a burden on those around you.Author and philosopher Ayn Rand,who Ringer lists as a source of inspiration,demonstrated the concept of rational self-interest through her fictional heroes-noble,dignified,purposeful characters such as Jon Galt and Howard Roark in `Atlas Shrugged' and `The Fountainhead'.In `Looking Out For No.1',Ringer provides an effective, down-to-earth,practical guide for enacting this concept in real-life.An entertaining read,Ringer provides many examples from his personal experience,some of which are quite humorous.Many of the characters he lists in the section on the `People Hurdle' will no doubt sound familiar to most readers.I enjoyed this one so much I have ordered two more of Robert's books!
Rating:
Summary: Good book, but taken to the extreme can alienate others...
Review: The only problem I have with the book is that it places too much emphasis on "thyself." Even though "rational selfishness" is a good theory, it can also alienate people from you if taken to the extreme. I can guarantee that many "rationally selfish" people who fight their way to the top aren't very happy people. Even though I am not totally against being rationally selfish it does have its place in society such as not wanting to put yourself in dangerous situations or as seen as closed minded. That's one of the reasons why I am ambivalent towards my nursing career. Even though I enjoy helping people, I also don't want to catch a serious illness from a stranger. In regards to the book, I think you have to find a middle ground between being rationally selfish and displaying altruism.
Helping others get what they want which in turn will get you what you want makes both parties happy. For example, U.S. Presidents skillfully display altruism in their role as presidents. They appeal to the masses to get what they want. If presidents acted blantantly in their best interest nobody would vote for them! They have to charm their audience by putting other people first. That's a skill that works in any arena of life.
I think if Robert Ringer would have expressed more warmth by helping others and taking the focus off himself he would have stayed on top of his millionaire status instead of constantly plummeting backwards into poverty.
I liked the book "OPERATION CHARISMA" better! Email me with your thoughts...
Rating:
Summary: A simplistic, but entertaining antedote
Review: to Irrational Selflessness, though a bit narcissistic at times. Part pragmatic philosophy and part instructional biography, "Looking Out for Number One" is Ringer's popularized interpretation of Ayn Rand's "Virtues of Rational Selfishness." His basic premise is that you should act in rational ways that either benefit yourself or bring pleasure to your life. This does not mean -- as many critics wrongly assume -- that you should not help others. But rather, you help others when doing so enhances or brings joy to your own life. As Ghandi said, "To change the world, you must first change yourself." The most intelligent way to change yourself is to act rationally from within yourself rather than based on the external judgment of others. Also, you should not expect others to accept your judgment of what is best for them. Ringer qualifies the other people in your life simply as flowers, weeds, and neurotics. Flowers are people that bring joy to your life. Weeds are people that you can remove by exclusion (not herbacide or homocide) from your life. And neurotics are people that you must deal with but who drive you crazy, because they don't act rationally (or act unpredictably). Since you are forced to deal with neurotics, you need to learn to act rationally with them. A fourth personality you must learn to manage is your own ego. It is like a sleeping dinosaur (or Godzilla), that when aroused, might roll over and crush your happiness (and most of Tokyo) if you don't control it. Not a great work of philosophy or literature, but still entertaining. A workable model on which to base your own rationally positive life philosophy for dealing with other poeple. You might also want to read some books about Transactional Analysis (search for Eric Berne) to understand why other people (and even you) may act neurotically at times.
| 
