Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences: The Red Queen and the Grand Scheme

Rating:
Summary: Homosexuals and Lesbians
Review: "They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen.

Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.

In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion." ...from God's Word

Rating:
Summary: Thank You From the Author
Review: Dear Reviewers: Just a short "thank you" for your wonderful critiques and reviews! I value your remarks so very much and appreciate your taking the time to share your views on line.
Sincerely, Judith Reisman

Rating:
Summary: Kinsey, Rockefeller and the Nazi doctors
Review: Dr. Judith Reisman's new book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences; The Red Queen & The Grand Scheme, presents sinister material on the man who seduced America.

The 1960s' sexual revolution was based on the most elaborate and carefully crafted scientific fraud of this century, writes author Judith Reisman. Early sexologist Alfred C. Kinsey, with his two famous reports just 50 years ago, seemingly legitimized both profligacy and deviancy, and thus established "the sexual licence he [personally] espoused." Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male (1948) and its female equivalent (1953) kicked off no-fault divorce, the wife-swapping era, the gay rights movement, classroom sex education, sex "therapy" as a growth industry, explicit imagery in the media and entertainment industry, and an avalanche of pornography and obscenity.

Although Kinsey was a sexual revolutionary, Dr. Reisman contends, he was falsely portrayed by Indiana University where he worked, and the Rockefeller Foundation which funded him, "as just a normal American guy/husband/family man who simply 'discovered' that 'really' most American men commonly engaged in sexually aberrant and outlaw behaviour. Kinsey's 'research' alleged that 10% of American males were homosexual, that all of us were bisexual, that children were sexual from birth and could engage in sexual activity with adults without harm, plus a whole broad spectrum of things taught today in our schools and practised today in courts of law as fact and as true...It was fraud then, it is fraud now and it revolutionized this nation and turned us into Kinsey's [psychological] clones."

His "Grand Scheme" was to eliminate normal families in favour of selective breeding predicated upon racial and sexual eugenics, she charges, and his "scientific conclusions" were concocted to advance it. The reference is to the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland who wanted the sentence (beheading) carried out first and the verdict pronounced afterwards.

Disturbing information about Kinsey's work and private life has been accumulating since his death in 1956 at age 62. (The official cause was pneumonia due to overwork, but his extensive homosexual and sado-masochistic activities were likely contributors.) Dr. Reisman revealed much of it in 1990, for example, in Kinsey, Sex and Fraud. Even last year's resolutely non-condemnatory biography by fellow Indiana University scholar James H. Jones-Alfred C. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life (Norton)-is replete with gruesomely shocking details.

Kinsey: Crime and Consequences cannot be described as non-condemnatory. Its central figure, Dr. Reisman asserts, "fits the classic definition of a sexual psychopath." Had the public known that he "and his male population were sexually abnormal, the popular use of their data to change [our] law, education and public policy would have come to a screeching halt." He was able, however, to blackmail into silence associates who knew about "his extensive use of deviants, his large prison population or, worse, his active child molesters."

Still, she thinks his "findings" should have roused suspicion. "When I first read Kinsey's research, I thought this man is not reporting on America-he's reporting on himself and then projecting that onto the nation. Kinsey prostituted his own wife Clara...into acts of sodomy with fellow 'researchers,' which Kinsey filmed. He seduced his own students at Indiana University-male, not female students. He devised sexual activities with his 'co-workers,' who then became his co-authors. He [personally] engaged in violent sadistic activity, in which he harmed himself terribly... and appears to have died, frankly, as a result of the trauma to his body."

But his famed reports were carefully phrased to obscure the fact that words like "contacts," "partners" and "sex play" could signify grown men sodomizing children. He was also both racist and cautious about his colleagues, avoiding Jews, blacks and moral traditionalists. Dr. Reisman quotes Kinsey co-author Wardell Pomeroy (Kinsey and The Institute for Sex Research, Harper & Row, 1972), on his hiring technique: "As usual...we took his sexual history first...[Then] Kinsey put down his pen and said, 'I don't think you want to work for us.' 'But I do,' the researcher insisted. 'Well, Kinsey observed, 'you have just said that premarital intercourse might lead to later difficulties in marriage, that extramarital relations would break up a marriage, that homosexuality is abnormal, and intercourse with animals is ludicrous. Apparently you have all the answers....Why do you want to do research?'"

Biographer Jones describes Kinsey as "one of the scholarly eugenicists of pre-WW II" who favoured mass sterilization for the lower classes and selective breeding for the "better classes." Moreover, Judith Reisman emphasizes, the Rockefeller Foundation was early interested in population control and in using the media to popularize it. The Reece Committee, investigating U.S. tax-exempt foundations in 1953-54, concluded that this "plutocratic control" was accomplished by "funding the 'right' university research by the 'right' researchers, then by funding mass media dissemination of the 'right' science data to the public." Kinsey's numbers made him a perfect fit for anyone eager to alter what he would call human "breeding patterns."

Dr. Reisman, a specialist in content analysis studies of written and visual media, lost many family members in the Holocaust. In that context she raises further sinister questions about Kinsey's data. For instance, who was the "lone pedophile," the "elderly gentleman" cited by Kinsey for his sexual molestation of 800 children? Who were "The Children of Table 34" and what became of them? How did Kinsey's "technically trained" observers gain access to the claimed 1,800 American children for illegal genital experiments? "To this day," she observes, "the Kinsey Institute and Indiana University have repeatedly...refused to reveal any names of the subjects or the experimenters." Nor has any one of these children ever come forward, although the institute seems an excellent target for lawsuits.

Even in the destitute 1930s, at the cited rate of a dollar a day, she doubts that children as young as three months were obtainable in such numbers around Bloomington, Indiana. She suggests an ominous but credible alternative: a collaborative link between Kinsey and Nazi Germany, then a police state where such "experimentation" could easily be conducted "as part of an ongoing collegial, cross-cultural, multinational, 'fact-finding' research project." She cites significant links, such as one George Sylvester Viereck, who worked for the German embassy in Washington, D.C., in those years, setting up Nazi front groups, and who is known to have been a Kinsey correspondent. Furthermore, the Rockefeller Foundation was simultaneously funding eugenics projects in Berlin.

Kinsey consistently kept secret his hypotheses and the basic facts upon which his conclusions rested, Dr. Reisman charges. "Neither Kinsey nor any of his team can rightly be termed 'scientists.' Their methodology was not scientific, for it was neither able to be replicated nor validated. Their data was anonymous, forced, secretly altered at will, and fraudulent. With the aid of the elite academic world and institutions and the support of public funds and the social planning foundations, Kinsey and his associates, who served as his own private male harem, conducted thousands of sexual interviews to present a false view of American sexual behaviours."

Amazingly, however, use of Kinsey data as authoritative has never been seriously challenged-until now. It must not continue, Dr. Reisman declares: "There [must] be a full and open public investigation into Kinsey's fraudulent data and its impact upon lawmakers, the military, the church, the press, the academic world, the family and all our institutions."

Kevin E. Abrams is co-author of The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality In The Nazi Party.

Rating:
Summary: Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences
Review: Dr. Reisman's book on the work and influence of Alfred C. Kinsey and Indiana University is a must read to understand the sexual revolution and its far-reaching tentacles in American culture. That which was hidden is now revealed for all who have open minds to read and understand. This is a significant book based on solid research that should be read by professionals in most every profession including clergy, lawyers, physicians, educators, legislators, social workers, and anyone interested in knowing how our sexual mores have migrated to current levels. Dr. Reisman explains in detail the crimes and consequences of Alfred C. Kinsey's contrived, criminal, and fraudelent "science" that permeates the U.S. like water in a sponge.

Rating:
Summary: Dr. Judith A. Reisman - A Voice Needed to be Heard
Review: I have recently read this book. I would caution the reader ... it is difficult to absorb, but, nonetheless, extremely necessary to digest. While it will, no doubt, shock and anger you to find out we've all been deceived, it is obviously crucial information to gain for the well-being of the futures of our children! You might ask, why would a non-professional, non-scholarly stay-at-home mother concern herself with this book. The answer is simple. I hate to be lied to by anyone, especially as it relates to our kids. Dr. Reisman totally debunks the validity of the Kinsey Report(s) in a direct and methodical process. No, I don't claim to understand all the details, but her reporting was simple and clear enough for me that I am outraged and determined to share this revelational information with any and everyone who I care about.

Might I also mention here, that I have had the unique opportunity to be with the author for a five-hour workshop recently. Dr. Reisman's articulate and sensitive handling of such delicate, yet necessary, information only convinced me more that this information must be made known ... NOW!

Rating:
Summary: Dr. Judith A. Reisman - A Voice Needed to be Heard
Review: I have recently read this book. I would caution the reader ... it is difficult to absorb, but, nonetheless, extremely necessary to digest. While it will, no doubt, shock and anger you to find out we've all been deceived, it is obviously crucial information to gain for the well-being of the futures of our children! You might ask, why would a non-professional, non-scholarly stay-at-home mother concern herself with this book. The answer is simple. I hate to be lied to by anyone, especially as it relates to our kids. Dr. Reisman totally debunks the validity of the Kinsey Report(s) in a direct and methodical process. No, I don't claim to understand all the details, but her reporting was simple and clear enough for me that I am outraged and determined to share this revelational information with any and everyone who I care about.

Might I also mention here, that I have had the unique opportunity to be with the author for a five-hour workshop recently. Dr. Reisman's articulate and sensitive handling of such delicate, yet necessary, information only convinced me more that this information must be made known ... NOW!

Rating:
Summary: Outstanding!
Review: I'd highly recommend this book to anyone who desires "knowledge of the truth." Western society is in alot of trouble and Dr. Reisman reveals one of the main reasons why. "Dr." Kinsey - misogynist and pederast - should've spent his years behind bars instead of being lauded as "the father of sexology." Keep up the good work, Dr. Reisman. The world needs more dedicated people like you.

Rating:
Summary: Total Propaganda
Review: In her zeal to discredit Alfred Kinsey Dr. Reisman allows her bias to become embarrassingly apparent. Her arguments are not supported by fact, and even the most casual of research reveals that many of her claims are false. While Alfred Kinsey's research makes fascinating study (his methodology was flawed making his findings questionable) Dr. Reisman (the Ph.D. is in communications, by the way) is more concerned with distorting the truth to support her agenda. She is admittedly opposed to homosexuality (she basically argues that all homosexuals are [...]), which is absolutely her right; however, he willingness to lie and deceive (the factual errors in this book were deliberate, I'm sorry) is quite shocking.

Rating:
Summary: Killing the messenger
Review: Kinsey obviously struck a nerve when he reported the existence of any kind of sexual activity other than blissful heterosexual monogamy, but he did not cause them. Certainly adultery, venereal disease, abortion, pornography, and pedophilia existed centuries before Kinsey collected this data. The timing of his report came at the time of other social changes from the new clean surgical techniques that made abdominal surgery safer, to coeducation, to the availability of the birth control pill. Clearly, he was part of a surge of change, but the change couldn't have occurred without many other factors, as well as the desire for change by society. Reisman ignores any of these complications in her zeal for the easy answer.

Yes, Kinsey's data is skewed toward the groups available for questioning-white college students, prisoners, and one dangerous pedophile. Data usually reflects the clusters of population at any time in history and the social segregation of all kinds that exist. The data on this book review is a small example-it represents the political clusters that exist now. Kinsey and IU, like any good researcher - and unlike Reisman - improves credibility by acknowledging these factors.

The lightning rod for criticism seems to be the pedophile that turned over his journals to Kinsey that covered in obsessive detail his partners, voluntary and involuntary; he began his devastating criminal activity decades before Kinsey reported it. Reisman might fight a losing battle debating that Kinsey's reporting role collecting information is different from the role of the perpetrator himself, so she doesn't even acknowledge it. Enlightened societies allow a news gatherer to publish a photo of a disturbing news event and don't blame the reporter. Furthermore, it seems an abdication of personal responsibility to blame the person holding up the mirror for what the mirror shows.

A bibliography added at the end is now standard procedure for the shrill political discourse that tops the Internet search charts, but in this case it proves as meaningless as when sports fans quote each other for support that their team should have won. I would rather see a summary of the author's credentials - where is that?

In sum, Kinsey's data shows information some would rather not learn from, so the author and her disciples kill the messenger.

Rating:
Summary: Excellent Work
Review: Reisman has done an excellent, scholarly job on this book. Completely supported by fact, she has sent Kinsey's bed-fellows up in arms.

Note how those who detract from the book say nothing substantive. They simply repeat that what is said is only hear-say. This is clearly not true. It is interesting how they give no examples of this 'hear-say.' Apparently those who had the 'experiments' done to them at 5 years old are not reliable. Since when were eye-witnesses unreliable????

Also, note how the detractors all admit that Kinsey's conclusions were entirely based on thoroughly unrepresentative samples. Modern studies (where they are able to be pursued) directly contradict Kinsey's studies.

Thank you Dr. Judith Reisman!