Rating: 
Summary: Utterly Fascinating
Review: Anthony Blunt was a child of the British Establishment, born to a middle class family with Church of England and royal connections. He received a fine education at Marlborough and Cambridge and became one of the most acclaimed art historians and teachers in Britain in the twentieth century. At the same time, he was a spy for the Soviets. The story of how Blunt became a communist, worked against his country while supposedly serving it in MI5 during World War II, then became a courtier for two monarchs and the highly regarded head of the Courtald Institute, which he made into one of the finest art schools in the country, is fascinating. Blunt was a man of many contradictions. At the same time he stood at the side of the Royal Family as the Surveyor of their art collection he was leading a secret gay life notorious for its seaminess. While he appeared to be a pillar of the Establishment he gave secret information to the Soviets and became the long sought after Fourth Man who was in league with Burgess, Maclean, and Philby before they defected to Russia. When he was unmasked in the 1960s the British government did its own contradictory little dance around him, granting him immunity while pumping him for information. Miranda Carter is sympathetic to Blunt and emphasizes his positives, like his fine teaching abilities and helpfulness to many of his students, but without whitewashing his treasonous activities. She helps us understand the pressure Blunt was under for many years and the fear of being unmasked that dominated him until he was finally publically denounced in 1979. Above all, she does a fine job of depicting the man's numerous contradictions. Highly recommended.
Rating:
Summary: Utterly Fascinating
Review: Anthony Blunt was a child of the British Establishment, born to a middle class family with Church of England and royal connections. He received a fine education at Marlborough and Cambridge and became one of the most acclaimed art historians and teachers in Britain in the twentieth century. At the same time, he was a spy for the Soviets. The story of how Blunt became a communist, worked against his country while supposedly serving it in MI5 during World War II, then became a courtier for two monarchs and the highly regarded head of the Courtald Institute, which he made into one of the finest art schools in the country, is fascinating. Blunt was a man of many contradictions. At the same time he stood at the side of the Royal Family as the Surveyor of their art collection he was leading a secret gay life notorious for its seaminess. While he appeared to be a pillar of the Establishment he gave secret information to the Soviets and became the long sought after Fourth Man who was in league with Burgess, Maclean, and Philby before they defected to Russia. When he was unmasked in the 1960s the British government did its own contradictory little dance around him, granting him immunity while pumping him for information. Miranda Carter is sympathetic to Blunt and emphasizes his positives, like his fine teaching abilities and helpfulness to many of his students, but without whitewashing his treasonous activities. She helps us understand the pressure Blunt was under for many years and the fear of being unmasked that dominated him until he was finally publically denounced in 1979. Above all, she does a fine job of depicting the man's numerous contradictions. Highly recommended.
Rating: 
Summary: Why did the author knock author John Costello?
Review: Carter wins on giving us numerous minutia about Blount's life and his odd selection of friends. But her book was not of great interest to a reader who was aware of Blount's peculiar nature and interest in art. It is difficult to understand how Blount or his friends, seemed completly oblivious of politics as Carter has laid out. Unless she is making the case that Blount was the perfect mole - at all times on guard against exposure. But I don't think she is trying to make that case.Carter gives us a blur of names, quotes, and a failure to find mention of expected comments in corresspondence such as the passing of Blount's father. It may be Carter's intention to show Blount's world as an extremely focused life which was hardly influenced by outside events; such as the end of World War One and the rise of Communism. I suspect Carter is trying to explain Blount as a Good Boy Who Does Bad Things.
Rating:
Summary: A Human Enigma
Review: From the first time (probably thousands of years ago) a monarch or military leader identified an "information gap" concerning an enemy, there has been a need for what is generally referred to now as "intelligence." I have just read Steven Fink's new book, Sticky Fingers, in which he suggests how to respond to the global risk of economic espionage. Much of his book focuses on what is now known as the "Avery Dennison/Four Pillars Spy Case." In recent years, we have learned about spies and counterspies such as Aldrich Ames and Robert Philip Hanssen. Many of us remain interested in others such as those known as "the Cambridge Spies" of whom Anthony Blunt was one. (The others were Guy Burgess, John Cairncross, Donald MacLean, and Kim Philby.) Even today, it is impossible to determine the nature and extent of all the damage they did to the British and American intelligence communities during and then following World War II . This is both a biography of Blunt (1907-1983) and an analysis of the society in which he was raised, educated, and then employed. He eventually became a highly regarded art historian while continuing his activities as a double agent. Blunt began to provide highly classified documents to the Russians in 1941; was discovered and then granted immunity (in 1964) in exchange for what was believed to be full disclosure of his activities and associates; and then was publicly denounced by Prime Minister Thatcher in 1979. Given the information available to her at the time she wrote this book, Miranda Carter has provided about as comprehensive an examination of Blunt's several "lives" as can possibly be reconstructed. I must assume that her two greatest obstacles were, first, the necessarily secretive, indeed defensive nature of the global intelligence community (even after the demise of the U.S.S.R.) and second, the extraordinarily detached personality of Blunt himself. With consummate skill, he devised and sustained so many different "lives" which resemble, for me, a series of "bulkheads." Gaining entry to any one of them (much less to all of them) would have required exceptional patience as well as persistence. It is to Carter's great credit that she was able to gather, evaluate, and correlate so much information and then present it eloquently in a narrative worthy of Dickens. Those who enjoyed reading this book as much as I did may wish to check out Christopher Andrew's For the President's Eyes Only: Secret Intelligence and the American Presidency from Washington to Bush, Christopher Felix' A Short Course in the Secret War, and Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones's The CIA and American Democracy.
Rating:
Summary: Anthony Blunt - His Lives
Review: In 1979, aged 72, eminent British art historian, Anthony Blunt, was exposed as a former spy for Russia. Many books recount Blunt's espionage, but British journalist Miranda Carter has written a complete biography. Fans of Bloomsbury will find new insights, and the author devotes half the book to Blunt's art career. Her exhaustive research into WWII espionage has produced a definitive and often amusing story. Immediately after being unmasked, Blunt became a social outcast. Tabloids described him as "the spy with no shame." Besides passing secrets, he was accused of being a sexual pervert, a plagiarizer, a dishonest appraiser, and someone who bought valuable paintings on the cheap from unsuspecting friends. Consulted about a libel suit, his lawyer explained that Blunt's spying had defamed his name so badly that no further defamation was possible. As an undergraduate in Cambridge, he was a member in good standing of the fashionable Bloomsbury Group, still going strong in the 1920s. Recognition for his art criticism came early. No one looked on him as a political activist. Bloomsbury faded with the depression and rise of fascism; many members turned to communism, but Blunt wasn't among them. He must have been attracted, however, because his art criticism took on a distinctly Marxist tone for a few years. His attraction must have been more intense because of what followed. Joining the Intelligence Service after the outbreak of war, he passed thousands of documents to the Russians. Flooded with material by enthusiastic English spies, Russian officials were deeply skeptical. In any case, there was far too much, so many documents were filed and ignored. The paranoid Stalin was avid to learn of British plots against Russia. That none turned up merely increased his suspicion, but eventually the Soviets realized their good fortune. Spying seemed a sideline for Blunt. Art was his true love, and he wrote several important books during the war. After leaving the government, Blunt's spying stopped, and he became a renown art historian. However, many in British counterintelligence had their suspicions. When Burgess and Maclean defected in 1951, suspicions grew stronger, but no one in high places had a taste for another embarassing spy scandal, so it was decided to let matters lie. A man of modest historical importance, Blunt lived a complex life in fascinating times, and this book does him justice.
Rating:
Summary: Anthony Blunt - His Lives
Review: In 1979, aged 72, eminent British art historian, Anthony Blunt, was exposed as a former spy for Russia. Many books recount Blunt's espionage, but British journalist Miranda Carter has written a complete biography. Fans of Bloomsbury will find new insights, and the author devotes half the book to Blunt's art career. Her exhaustive research into WWII espionage has produced a definitive and often amusing story. Immediately after being unmasked, Blunt became a social outcast. Tabloids described him as "the spy with no shame." Besides passing secrets, he was accused of being a sexual pervert, a plagiarizer, a dishonest appraiser, and someone who bought valuable paintings on the cheap from unsuspecting friends. Consulted about a libel suit, his lawyer explained that Blunt's spying had defamed his name so badly that no further defamation was possible. As an undergraduate in Cambridge, he was a member in good standing of the fashionable Bloomsbury Group, still going strong in the 1920s. Recognition for his art criticism came early. No one looked on him as a political activist. Bloomsbury faded with the depression and rise of fascism; many members turned to communism, but Blunt wasn't among them. He must have been attracted, however, because his art criticism took on a distinctly Marxist tone for a few years. His attraction must have been more intense because of what followed. Joining the Intelligence Service after the outbreak of war, he passed thousands of documents to the Russians. Flooded with material by enthusiastic English spies, Russian officials were deeply skeptical. In any case, there was far too much, so many documents were filed and ignored. The paranoid Stalin was avid to learn of British plots against Russia. That none turned up merely increased his suspicion, but eventually the Soviets realized their good fortune. Spying seemed a sideline for Blunt. Art was his true love, and he wrote several important books during the war. After leaving the government, Blunt's spying stopped, and he became a renown art historian. However, many in British counterintelligence had their suspicions. When Burgess and Maclean defected in 1951, suspicions grew stronger, but no one in high places had a taste for another embarassing spy scandal, so it was decided to let matters lie. A man of modest historical importance, Blunt lived a complex life in fascinating times, and this book does him justice.
Rating:
Summary: Definitively well researched and written bio
Review: Miranda Carter has been justly acclaimed for producing a biography on Anthony Blunt that cuts through all the weird and assorted myths that have attached to him over the years since the revelations of his spying were made public. This book is richly rewarding as it connects the many lives of this very private public figure. Blunt is a complex personality and it took thorough research and the skill of a good writer to fully appreciate and capture these many and varied layers. The examination into the world of academia and art history was particularly well done and held the interest of this reader. I picked up this book because of the spying details but, to my surprise, found myself as riveted by all the other aspects of this man's live. This book, unlike all the others written about the Cambridge spies, does not come with an axe to grind and it is all the stronger for that abscence. Highly recommended.
Rating:
Summary: Art, sex, royalty and spies -- all in one man's life!
Review: Miranda Carter's biography of Anthony Blunt in an engrossing account of a man who lived multiple careers, some of the contradictory. In the 1940s he helped establish the discipline of art history in England, became one of its leading scholars, even art curator to Buckingham Palace. All the while he was spying for the Soviet Union. Ms. Carter has structured her book like an onion, peeling back the layers of her subject's life, including his colorful homosexual pursuits, until he is exposed as a spy in 1979. Hers is a very sympathetic portrait, and in the final 100 pages Ms. Carter even conveys the tragic dimension of Blunt when he is humiliated in public. This is not just another tell-all biography. Ms. Carter scrupulously weighs earlier evidence from Blunt's friends and foes, accepting or rejecting them according to rigorous standards. Hardly a detail finds its way into her pages that is not based on a checked source. Ms. Carter has also accessed Soviet espionage files and agents' accounts that have come to light since 1989. Her book is a masterful piece of research that is also at times amusing and sad. Unfortunately, Ms. Carter's publisher, Farrar Straus and Giroux, does not seem to share her scruples for detail. They have printed an American edition that is downright slovenly. Reader beware: there are typos and/or omitted words on the following pages: 66, 80, 300, 351, 363, 402, 404, 429 and 448. And these are just the ones I spotted.
Rating:
Summary: Not a man to know . . .
Review: Miranda Carter's intriguing new book has everything one would want if this had been merely a spy novel. The good news is that Anthony Blunt was the real thing. Carter's in-depth approach and occasional analysis takes what could have been an ordinary book and raises it several notches. She gives the reader an astounding amount of the rich detail of Blunt's life from his birth to his death while still allowing one to judge Blunt's actions in the context of his times. How one man could move so effortlessly through the upper crust of British society (he maintained good relations with the Royal family) while passing documents to Russia over a period of years without the knowledge of his family and many of his friends is a mystery deserving of a book like this one. Unfortunately, the narrative sometimes suffers. Carter's writing style, while informative, tends to be dry and overloaded with names that have little bearing on Blunt's life. With often minimal introduction to the large cast of characters she tends to dive into paragraphs as if she were in the middle of an explanation. I found myself on many an occasion wanting to reach for a roster of names as I tried to remember how each one fit in to the story. It has the tendency of slowing down the reading almost to a point of disinterest. That being said, this book is well worth it. Carter has given us a unique look at a man whose double life (in so many ways) was extraordinary. Her service to her subject and to us lies in her research. Each reader may come to different conclusions about Anthony Blunt but it is to Miranda Carter's credit that she has taken the time and the care to present him to us.
Rating:
Summary: The Most Famous Quintet
Review: The individuals who comprised The Cambridge Five have been extensively documented as individuals as well as a group. Miranda Carter's book is worthwhile for it not only brings truly new information to this man's duplicity; she also spends a great deal of time on the man himself. This is a thorough autobiography and not just a spy novel barely elevated to the non-fiction category. Some readers may find the book too long on the man and too brief on his activities as a spy. Anthony Blunt was a traitor, but to limit his long life to that one word is to greatly minimize who this man was. The wide-ranging life he lead together with the positions of influence he held outside of intelligence agencies, makes him an even more fascinating character. None of his actions diminish or justify his perfidious conduct; they do make him much more than a one-dimensional traitor to his country. Most of the spies that are exposed today have often become extremely wealthy for betraying their country. When Blunt was first recruited it was during a time when the Oxford Union Society within the college carried the debate with the motion, "that this house declines to fight for King or Country". In October of 1933 the Labor Party on, "no issue but the pacifist one", according to Stanley Baldwin replaced the Conservatives. And Europe in general was not interested much less enthusiastic about a second world war less than a generation after the first finally ended. Persons notable not only for their fame but also for their gullibility marketed Communism with success including their tours and subsequent spreading of nonsense regarding Potemkin Villages. These folks were believers; they were not making a living. They were supporting something they actually believed in at one time as opposed to those who are on the hunt for their various pieces of silver. What Miranda Carter meticulously documents is Blunt's life as a nearly unbroken series of either unconventional or anti-establishment choices. There is also a great deal of evidence that as competent an art historian as he may have been, it also appears participating in art fraud was yet another of this man's defects. I found her documentation of his almost ascetic living conditions interesting as well. There may be something that I am missing but I was amazed with the leniency England treated men like Blunt. In 1964 he admitted to his activities for which he was granted complete immunity. It was not until Margaret Thatcher revealed this deal in 1979 out of either personal anger or thought for political gain was he finally exposed. As the defections of his more notorious comrades had already taken place and England had been greatly embarrassed, it seems odd that fear of further embarrassment would cause them to make a deal with this criminal long after he was a meaningful asset to the Former USSR. Miranda Carter also documents the periods when none of the Cambridge Recruits were believed to be genuine by Moscow, and how vast amounts of information they delivered was never even read. I have read a number of books on this topic and would recommend this book for anyone who is interested. I expect there will be more books if and when additional documents are found/released, but until then this is the best work I have read on Blunt.
|
